Shocks in green and conventional energy consumption and their impacts on economic growth: a revisit for China and India

被引:0
作者
Krishna, Aparna [1 ]
Parween, Kulsum [1 ]
Irfan, Mohd [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Indian Sch Mines Dhanbad, Dept Management Studies & Ind Engn, Dhanbad, India
关键词
Economic growth; Green and conventional energy consumption; Non-linear analysis; NARDL; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; NONRENEWABLE ENERGY; CO2; EMISSIONS; TIME-SERIES; CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; COAL CONSUMPTION; NEXUS; GDP;
D O I
10.1108/IJESM-09-2024-0050
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to argue that responses in economic growth (EG) resulting from positive and negative shocks in energy consumption could be a non-linear phenomenon. Thus, the study aims to investigate the existence of non-linear long-run effects of positive and negative shocks in green and conventional energy consumption on EG for China and India. By decomposing energy consumption in positive and negative shocks, the study seeks to determine the distinct impact of positive and negative shocks in energy (conventional and green) consumption on EG of China and India.Design/methodology/approachA non-linear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model based on energy-augmented environment Kuznets curve (EKC) framework is used on annual time series covering the period 1965-2021. The study uses a precise econometric methodology, starting with unit root tests to assess stationarity, moving to the estimation of the NARDL model, which resulted in the calculation of long-run coefficients and error correction terms to analyse the rate of adjustment towards equilibrium.FindingsThe empirical findings demonstrate that there exists a non-linear cointegrating relationship among EG, carbon emissions and green and conventional energy consumption for both economies. In the long run, a non-linear impact of green energy consumption (GEC) on EG is evident for China only, whereas non-linear impact of conventional energy consumption (CEC) on EG is visible for both countries.Practical implicationsWhile China and India prioritise energy diversification by embracing green energy to promote energy security and limit rising carbon emissions, it is interesting to investigate how positive and negative shocks in GEC and CEC have affected their EG. Second, this paper examines the trade-offs between EG and GEC/CEC in China and India, two high-carbon emitters. The disparities in trade-offs may indicate how well each country's energy policies address increased EG with fewer energy-induced carbon emissions.Originality/valueThis study examines non-linear cointegration among the variables of interest, whereas most prior studies have focused on linear cointegration. The existence of non-linear cointegration may suggest that positive and negative shocks in GEC and CEC can result in non-linear reactions in EG. Thus, it establishes a basis for examining the non-linear long-term effects of GEC and CEC on EG. The research findings indicate significant consequences and necessitate prompt intervention to alleviate the detrimental impacts of shocks in GEC and CEC on EG in China and India and provide several important inputs to address the inherent challenges of energy transition goals.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [1] Biomass energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: Fresh evidence from West Africa using a simultaneous equation model
    Adewuyi, Adeolu O.
    Awodumi, Olabanji B.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 119 : 453 - 471
  • [2] Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis of the Indian economy
    Ahmad, Ashfaq
    Zhao, Yuhuan
    Shahbaz, Muhammad
    Bano, Sadia
    Zhang, Zhonghua
    Wang, Song
    Liu, Ya
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 96 : 131 - 143
  • [3] Asymmetric effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions of BRICS economies: evidence from nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag model
    Akram, Rabia
    Majeed, Muhammad Tariq
    Fareed, Zeeshan
    Khalid, Fahad
    Ye, Chengang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (15) : 18254 - 18268
  • [4] Dynamic modeling of causal relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in India
    Alam, Mohammad Jahangir
    Begum, Ismat Ara
    Buysse, Jeroen
    Rahman, Sanzidur
    Van Huylenbroeck, Guido
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (06) : 3243 - 3251
  • [5] The role of renewable energy consumption on environmental degradation in EU countries: do institutional quality, technological innovation, and GDP matter?
    Alavijeh, Nooshin Karimi
    Shadmehri, Mohammad Taher Ahmadi
    Nazeer, Nazia
    Zangoei, Samane
    Dehdar, Fatemeh
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (15) : 44607 - 44624
  • [6] A dynamic relationship between renewable energy consumption, nonrenewable energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from Asian emerging economies
    Ali, Arshad
    Radulescu, Magdalena
    Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 34 (08) : 3529 - 3552
  • [7] On the factors influencing the ecological footprint: using an asymmetric quantile regression approach
    Alqaralleh, Huthaifa
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2024, 35 (01) : 220 - 247
  • [8] Revisiting the effects of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic growth for eight countries: asymmetric panel quantile approach
    Alqaralleh, Huthaifa
    Hatemi-J, Abdulnasser
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2024, 18 (02) : 334 - 349
  • [9] Are the macroeconomic effects on oil price asymmetric? An asymmetric quantile regression approach
    Alqaralleh, Huthaifa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2022, 16 (05) : 1000 - 1014
  • [10] On the nexus of CO2 emissions and renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption in Europe: A new insight from panel smooth transition
    Alqaralleh, Huthaifa
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 32 (03) : 443 - 457