Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Gabriel, Pierre-Etienne [1 ]
Pinar, Ugo [1 ]
Lenfant, Louis [1 ]
Parra, Jerome [1 ]
Vaessen, Christophe [1 ]
Mozer, Pierre [1 ]
Chartier-Kastler, Emmanuel [1 ]
Roupret, Morgan [1 ]
Seisen, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, Pitie Salpetriere Hop, GRC 5, Predict Onco Urol,APHP, Paris, France
关键词
bladder cancer; radical cystectomy; robotic surgical procedures; postoperative complications; comparative effectiveness research; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS; EXTRACORPOREAL;
D O I
10.1111/bju.16565
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) vs open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer (BC). Patients and Methods We conducted a real-life monocentric study including all consecutive patients who underwent RARC with ICUD or ORC for BC at our institution from 2014 to 2023. Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to compare perioperative, oncological and stricture outcomes between both groups by calculating odds (ORs) and hazard (HRs) ratios with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Results Overall, 316 patients underwent either RARC with ICUD (n = 228 [72.2%]) or ORC (n = 88 [27.8%]). The perioperative benefits of RARC vs ORC included decreased risks of major blood loss (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.23; P < 0.001), perioperative transfusion (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57; P < 0.001), 90-day major complications (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.29-0.99; P = 0.04), and prolonged initial length of hospital stay (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.35; P < 0.001), as well as more days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.46-4.6; P < 0.01). In addition, the use of RARC vs ORC was associated with a higher lymph node (LN) count (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.83-6.30; P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in recurrence-free (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49-1.07; P = 0.1), cancer-specific (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.43-1.10; P = 0.1), overall (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47-1.20; P = 0.3) and uretero-ileal stricture-free (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.62-2.25; P = 0.6) survival between both groups after a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 42.3 (16.4-73.8) months. Conclusion Our real-world study supports the effectiveness of RARC with ICUD vs ORC for BC. We generally observed better perioperative outcomes, as well as similar oncological-except for higher LN count-and uretero-ileal stricture outcomes after RARC with ICUD vs ORC.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 527
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Extracorporeal vs Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion
    Chan, Kevin G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (05): : 1467 - 1468
  • [2] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL CYSTECTOMY AND INTRACORPOREAL URINARY DIVERSION
    Nucciotti, Roberto
    Pizzuti, Valerio
    Mengoni, Francesco
    Viggiani, Fabrizio
    Costantini, Fabio Massimo
    Passavanti, Giandomenico
    Bragaglia, Alessandro
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (05) : 1829 - 1829
  • [3] INTRACORPOREAL URINARY DIVERSION IN THE ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL CYSTECTOMY (RARC)
    Edeling, Sebastian
    Pokupic, Sasa
    ARCHIV EUROMEDICA, 2014, 4 (02): : 7 - 9
  • [4] Treatment of invasive bladder cancer. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion
    Bier, S.
    Sim, A.
    Balbay, D.
    Todenhoefer, T.
    Aufderklamm, S.
    Halalsheh, O.
    Mischinger, J.
    Boettge, J.
    Rausch, S.
    Stenzl, A.
    Gakis, G.
    Canda, E.
    Schwentner, C.
    UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (01): : 41 - 46
  • [5] Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy for Patients With Bladder Cancer
    Dixon, Simon
    Hill, Harry
    Flight, Laura
    Khetrapal, Pramit
    Ambler, Gareth
    Williams, Norman R.
    Brew-Graves, Chris
    Kelly, John D.
    Catto, James W. F.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (06) : E2317255
  • [6] Current Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion
    Kurpad, Raj
    Woods, Michael
    Pruthi, Raj
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 17 (06)
  • [7] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with complete intracorporeal urinary diversion
    Sandberg, Jason M.
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 3 (03) : 156 - 166
  • [8] Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: A New Standard of Urinary Diversion
    You, Chengyu
    Du, Yuelin
    Wang, Hui
    Peng, Lei
    Wei, Tangqiang
    Zhang, Xiaojun
    Li, Xianhui
    Wang, Anguo
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (04) : 473 - 482
  • [9] Current Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion
    Raj Kurpad
    Michael Woods
    Raj Pruthi
    Current Urology Reports, 2016, 17
  • [10] Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion - safe and reproducible?
    Sim, Allen
    Balbay, Mevlana Derya
    Todenhoefer, Tilman
    Aufderklamm, Stefan
    Halalsheh, Omar
    Mischinger, Johannes
    Boettge, Johannes
    Rausch, Steffen
    Bier, Simone
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Gakis, Georgios
    Schwentner, Christian
    Canda, Abdullah Erdem
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (01) : 18 - 23