Severe Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity Among Gestational Carriers: A Cohort Study

被引:8
作者
Velez, Maria P. [1 ,2 ]
Ivanova, Marina [3 ]
Shellenberger, Jonas [2 ]
Pudwell, Jessica [3 ]
Ray, Joel G. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Queens Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[4] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med & Obstet & Gynaecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
ENDOMETRIOSIS; CONCEPTION; SURROGACY; OUTCOMES; WOMEN; MODE; RISK;
D O I
10.7326/M24-0417
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Use of a gestational ("surrogate") carrier is increasingly common. Risk for maternal and neonatal adversity is largely unknown in this birthing population. Objective: To determine the risk for severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and severe neonatal morbidity (SNM) in gestational carriers. Design: Population-based cohort study. Setting: All of Ontario, Canada. Participants: All singleton births at more than 20 weeks' gestation, from 2012 to 2021. Measurements: Exposure was type of conception, namely, gestational carriage (main exposure), unassisted conception (comparison group 1), and in vitro fertilization (IVF) (comparison group 2). Main composite outcomes were SMM and SNM. Modified Poisson regression models generated weighted relative risks (wRRs) using propensity score-based overlap weighting. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, and postpartum hemorrhage. Results: Of all eligible singleton births, 846 124 (97.6%) were by unassisted conception, 16 087 (1.8%) by IVF, and 806 (0.1%) by gestational carriage. Respective risks for SMM were 2.3%, 4.3%, and 7.8%. The wRRs were 3.30 (95% CI, 2.59 to 4.20) comparing gestational carriage with unassisted conception and 1.86 (CI, 1.36 to 2.55) comparing gestational carriage with IVF. Respective risks for SNM were 5.9%, 8.9%, and 6.6%, generating wRRs of 1.20 (CI, 0.92 to 1.55) for gestational carriage versus unassisted conception and 0.81 (CI, 0.61 to 1.08) for gestational carriage versus IVF. Hypertensive disorders, postpartum hemorrhage, and preterm birth at less than 37 weeks were also significantly higher contrasting gestational carriers to either comparison group. Limitation: Absence of information about indications for choosing a gestational carrier, and oocyte or sperm donor source. Conclusion: Among singleton births of more than 20 weeks' gestation, a higher risk for SMM and adverse pregnancy outcomes was seen among gestational carriers compared with women who conceived with and without assistance. Although gestational carriage was associated with preterm birth, there was less clear evidence of severe neonatal morbidity. Potential mechanisms for higher maternal morbidity among gestational carriers require elucidation, alongside developing special care plans for gestational carriers. Primary Funding Source: The Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
引用
收藏
页码:1482 / 1488
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Recommendations for practices using gestational carriers: a committee opinion [J].
不详 .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 118 (01) :65-74
[2]   Assisted reproductive technology and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analyses [J].
Chih, Hui Ju ;
Elias, Flavia T. S. ;
Gaudet, Laura ;
Velez, Maria P. .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
[3]   Assisted reproduction involving gestational surrogacy: an analysis of the medical, psychosocial and legal issues: experience from a large surrogacy program [J].
Dar, Shir ;
Lazer, Tal ;
Swanson, Sonja ;
Silverman, Jan ;
Wasser, Cindy ;
Moskovtsev, Sergey I. ;
Sojecki, Agata ;
Librach, Clifford L. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 (02) :345-352
[4]   Infertility treatment and risk of severe maternal morbidity: a propensity score-matched cohort study [J].
Dayan, Natalie ;
Joseph, K. S. ;
Fell, Deshayne B. ;
Laskin, Carl A. ;
Basso, Olga ;
Park, Alison L. ;
Luo, Jin ;
Guan, Jun ;
Ray, Joel G. .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2019, 191 (05) :E118-E127
[5]   International gestational surrogacy in the United States, 2014-2020 [J].
Herweck, Alexandra ;
Desantis, Carol ;
Shandley, Lisa M. ;
Kawwass, Jennifer F. ;
Hipp, Heather S. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2024, 121 (04) :622-630
[6]   Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores via the Overlap Weights [J].
Li, Fan ;
Thomas, Laine E. ;
Li, Fan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 188 (01) :250-257
[7]   Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Lodge-Tulloch, Nakeisha A. ;
Elias, Flavia T. S. ;
Pudwell, Jessica ;
Gaudet, Laura ;
Walker, Mark ;
Smith, Graeme N. ;
Velez, Maria P. .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
[8]   Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: A systematic review and meta-analyses [J].
McDonald, Sarah D. ;
Han, Zhen ;
Mulla, Sohail ;
Murphy, Kellie E. ;
Beyene, Joseph ;
Ohlsson, Arne .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 146 (02) :138-148
[9]   Gestational surrogacy: results of 10 years of experience in the Netherlands [J].
Peters, Henrike E. ;
Schats, Roel ;
Verhoeven, Marieke O. ;
Mijatovic, Velja ;
de Groot, Christianne J. M. ;
Sandberg, Joanna L. ;
Peeters, Immelie P. ;
Lambalk, Cornelis B. .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2018, 37 (06) :725-731
[10]   Aspirin Use for Preeclampsia Prevention Among Women With Prepregnancy Diabetes, Obesity, and Hypertension [J].
Ray, Joel G. ;
Abdulaziz, Kasim E. ;
Berger, Howard .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 327 (04) :388-+