Solving Variables With Monte Carlo Simulation Experiments: A Stochastic Root-Solving Approach

被引:1
作者
Chalmers, R. Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Dept Psychol, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词
Monte Carlo methods; simulation experiments; stochastic root finding; probabilistic bisection; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; SAMPLE-SIZE; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; POWER; REGRESSION; MODELS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1037/met0000689
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Despite their popularity and flexibility, questions remain regarding how to optimally solve particular unknown variables of interest using Monte Carlo simulation experiments. This article reviews two common approaches based on either performing deterministic iterative searches with noisy objective functions or by constructing interpolation estimates given fitted surrogate functions, highlighting the inefficiencies and inferential concerns of both methods. To address these limitations, and to fill a gap in existing Monte Carlo experimental methodology, a novel algorithm termed the probabilistic bisection algorithm with bolstering and interpolations (ProBABLI) is presented with the goal providing efficient, consistent, and unbiased estimates (with associated confidence intervals) for the stochastic root equations found in Monte Carlo simulation research. Properties of the ProBABLI approach are demonstrated using practical sample size planning applications for independent samples t tests and structural equation models given target power rates, precision criteria, and expected power functions that incorporate prior beliefs.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   A mixture item response model for multiple-choice data [J].
Bolt, DM ;
Cohen, AS ;
Wollack, JA .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2001, 26 (04) :381-409
[2]   Reporting Monte Carlo Studies in Structural Equation Modeling [J].
Boomsma, Anne .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2013, 20 (03) :518-540
[3]  
Brent R. P., 1973, ALGORITHMS MINIMIZAT
[4]   Writing effective and reliable Monte Carlo simulations with the SimDesign package [J].
Chalmers, R. Philip ;
Adkins, Mark C. .
QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 16 (04) :248-280
[5]   Model-Based Measures for Detecting and Quantifying Response Bias [J].
Chalmers, R. Philip .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2018, 83 (03) :696-732
[6]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[7]   The New Statistics: Why and How [J].
Cumming, Geoff .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (01) :7-29
[8]  
de Rosario Helios, 2020, CRAN
[9]  
Fang H, 2008, J MOD APPL STAT METH, V7, P101
[10]   Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Buchner, Axel ;
Lang, Albert-Georg .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :1149-1160