On the structure refinement of metal complexes against 3D electron diffraction data using multipolar scattering factors

被引:0
|
作者
Pacoste, Laura [1 ]
Ignat'ev, Vladislav Mikhailovich [2 ]
Dominiak, Paulina Maria [2 ]
Zou, Xiaodong [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Mat & Environm Chem, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Warsaw, Biol & Chem Res Ctr, Fac Chem, Warsaw, Poland
来源
IUCRJ | 2024年 / 11卷
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
organometallic complexes; charge density distribution modelling; 3D electron diffraction; 3D ED; transferable aspherical atom model; TAAM; independent atom model limitations; electron crystallography; quantum crystallography; ASPHERICAL ATOM REFINEMENTS; POPULATION ANALYSIS; DATA-BANK; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURES; INVARIOM DATABASE; SMALL-MOLECULE; CHARGE; DENSITIES; MODEL; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1107/S2052252524006730
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This study examines various methods for modelling the electron density and, thus, the electrostatic potential of an organometallic complex for use in crystal structure refinement against 3D electron diffraction (ED) data. It focuses on modelling the scattering factors of iron(III), considering the electron density distribution specific for coordination with organic linkers. We refined the structural model of the metal-organic complex, iron(III) acetylacetonate (FeAcAc), using both the independent atom model (IAM) and the transferable aspherical atom model (TAAM). TAAM refinement initially employed multipolar parameters from the MATTS databank for acetylacetonate, while iron was modelled with a spherical and neutral approach (TAAM ligand). Later, custom-made TAAM scattering factors for Fe-O coordination were derived from DFT calculations [TAAM-ligand-Fe(III)]. Our findings show that, in this compound, the TAAM scattering factor corresponding to Fe3+ has a lower scattering amplitude than the Fe3+ charged scattering factor described by IAM. When using scattering factors corresponding to the oxidation state of iron, IAM inaccurately represents electrostatic potential maps and overestimates the scattering potential of the iron. In addition, TAAM significantly improved the fitting of the model to the data, shown by improved R-1 values, goodness-of-fit (GooF) and reduced noise in the Fourier difference map (based on the residual distribution analysis). For 3D ED, R-1 values improved from 19.36% (IAM) to 17.44% (TAAM-ligand) and 17.49% (TAAM-ligand-Fe3+), and for single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) from 3.82 to 2.03% and 1.98%, respectively. For 3D ED, the most significant R-1 reductions occurred in the low-resolution region (8.65-2.00 angstrom), dropping from 20.19% (IAM) to 14.67% and 14.89% for TAAM-ligand and TAAM-ligand-Fe(III), respectively, with less improvement in high-resolution ranges (2.00-0.85 angstrom). This indicates that the major enhancements are due to better scattering modelling in low-resolution zones. Furthermore, when using TAAM instead of IAM, there was a noticeable improvement in the shape of the thermal ellipsoids, which more closely resembled those of an SCXRD-refined model. This study demonstrates the applicability of more sophisticated scattering factors to improve the refinement of metal-organic complexes against 3D ED data, suggesting the need for more accurate modelling methods and highlighting the potential of TAAM in examining the charge distribution of large molecular structures using 3D ED.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 890
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Following structure evolution of SrFeOx in redox reactions using in situ 3D electron diffraction
    Batuk, M.
    Vandemeulebroucke, D.
    Hadermann, J.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2021, 77 : C419 - C419
  • [32] Crystal Structure of Indomethacin Polymorph δ Solved by 3D Electron Diffraction
    Lightowler, Molly
    Li, Shuting
    Ou, Xiao
    Zou, Xiaodong
    Lu, Ming
    Xu, Hongyi
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2021, 77 : C255 - C255
  • [33] Crystal structure of copper perchlorophthalocyanine analysed by 3D electron diffraction
    Gorelik, Tatiana E.
    Habermehl, Stefan
    Shubin, Aleksandr A.
    Gruene, Tim
    Yoshida, Kaname
    Oleynikov, Peter
    Kaiser, Ute
    Schmidt, Martin U.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION B-STRUCTURAL SCIENCE CRYSTAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS, 2021, 77 : 662 - 675
  • [34] 3D structure determination from HRTEM and electron diffraction tomography
    Zou, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Daliang
    Oleynikov, Peter
    Sun, Junliang
    Hovmoller, Sven
    MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS, 2009, 15 : 56 - 57
  • [35] Using 3D-ΔPDFs from electron diffraction data to determine local structure
    Schmidt, E. M.
    Krysiak, Y.
    Klar, P. B.
    Palatinus, L.
    Goodwin, A. L.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2022, 78 : E157 - E158
  • [36] Structure Analysis of Approximants for Quasicrystals with 3D Electron Diffraction Tomography
    Ma, Yanhang
    Oleynikov, Peter
    Fujita, Nobuhisa
    Javier Garcia, Francisco
    Ishimasa, Tsutomu
    Teresakia, Osamu
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2013, 69 : S105 - S106
  • [37] Study of distorted octahedral structure in 3d transition metal complexes using XAFS
    Gaur, A.
    Nair, N. Nitin
    Shrivastava, B. D.
    Das, B. K.
    Chakrabortty, Monideepa
    Jha, S. N.
    Bhattacharyya, D.
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 2018, 692 : 382 - 387
  • [38] Shedding light into metal corrosion on Tang dynasty gilded bronzes using 3D Electron Diffraction
    Das, P. P.
    Gomez-Perez, A.
    Galanis, A. S.
    Liritzis, I.
    Nicolopoulos, S.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2024, 80
  • [39] Diffraction limited 3D cell volume derivation for scattering data analysis
    Rao, NAHK
    Barbu-McInnis, M
    Helguera, M
    Daly, CJ
    MEDICAL IMAGE 2002: ULTRASONIC IMAGING AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2002, 4687 : 334 - 344
  • [40] Structure solution and refinement of metal-ion battery cathode materials using electron diffraction tomography
    Hadermann, Joke
    Abakumov, Artem M.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION B-STRUCTURAL SCIENCE CRYSTAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS, 2019, 75 : 485 - 494