Delineating upper limb longitudinal recovery after simple mastectomy, implant or autologous breast reconstruction using wearable activity monitors

被引:0
作者
Bakri , Nur Amalina Che [1 ,2 ]
Kwasnicki, Richard M. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Giannas, Emmanuel [1 ]
Dutta, Tanusree [1 ]
Hunter, Judith E. [4 ]
Henry, Francis P. [4 ]
Wood, Simon [1 ,4 ]
Ashrafian, Hutan [1 ,2 ]
Darzi, Ara [1 ,2 ]
Leff, Daniel R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, Acad Surg Unit, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, St Marys Hosp, Praed St, London W2 1NY, England
[3] Charing Cross Hosp, Breast Unit, Fulham Palace Rd, London W6 8RF, England
[4] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Charing Cross Hosp, London, England
关键词
Upper limb activity; Upper limb recovery; Simple mastectomy; Deep inferior epigastric perforator reconstruction; Implant breast reconstruction; Wearable activity monitors; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; DIEP;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2025.02.012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The demand for breast reconstruction has increased owing to the established benefits for patients. Given the long-term survivorship, objective data are vital to aid patients in making treatment decisions. This prospective longitudinal observational study was carried out to objectively quantify the impact of simple mastectomy (Mx), implant-based reconstruction (IBR) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) on upper limb (UL) activity using wearable activity monitors (WAMs). Methods: Forty-eight consecutive patients who underwent breast and reconstructive surgery were identified from operating schedules. Recruited participants were invited to wear WAMs on both wrists for an average of 3 days preoperatively, for 2 weeks post-operatively and more than 6 months post-operatively. Results: A significantly greater reduction in gross physical activity as a percentage of preoperative activity was observed in DIEP compared with Mx and IBR patients across week 1 (median: 40% versus 62% versus 62%; p < 0.001) and week 2 (median: 60% versus 77% versus 84%; p < 0.001). In the long-term follow-up, the average activity had reached or exceeded their baseline levels for all operative procedures, Mx=114%, IBR=98% and DIEP=103%. DIEP was an independent predictor of recovery in weeks 1 (F=4.796, p=0.043) and 2 (F=7.306, p=0.015). Conclusion: Despite DIEP patients having the lowest UL activity level in the acute post-operative period when compared with Mx and IBR patients, average activity levels returned to baseline in the long-term for all procedures. Objective monitoring of recovery using WAMs can support the development of a personalised rehabilitation programme for those at risk of developing complications. (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [21] Factors associated with acute postoperative pain following breast reconstruction
    Kulkarni, A. R.
    [J]. JPRAS OPEN, 2021, 30 : 170 - 170
  • [22] The Effects of Postmastectomy Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Immediate Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Lam, Thomas C.
    Hsieh, Frank
    Boyages, John
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (03) : 511 - 518
  • [23] Physiotherapy treatment of late symptoms following surgical treatment of breast cancer
    Lauridsen, MC
    Torsleff, KR
    Husted, H
    Erichsen, C
    [J]. BREAST, 2000, 9 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [24] Functional integrity of the shoulder joint and pectoralis major following subpectoral implant breast reconstruction
    Leonardis, Joshua M.
    Lyons, Daniel A.
    Giladi, Aviram M.
    Momoh, Adeyiza O.
    Lipps, David B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2019, 37 (07) : 1610 - 1619
  • [25] A systematic review of donor site aesthetic and complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction
    Lindenblatt, Nicole
    Gruenherz, Lisanne
    Farhadi, Jian
    [J]. GLAND SURGERY, 2019, 8 (04) : 389 - +
  • [26] Evaluating the effect of upper-body morbidity on quality of life following primary breast cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Macdonald, Eliza R.
    Amorim, Nadia M. L.
    Hagstrom, Amanda D.
    Markovic, Katarina
    Simar, David
    Ward, Rachel E.
    Clifford, Briana K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2024, 18 (05) : 1517 - 1547
  • [27] MacNeill F., 2021, Breast Surgery: GIRFT Programme National Specialty Report
  • [28] Optimal assessment tools in assessing breast surgery: patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) vs. objective measures
    Morley, Rachel
    Leech, Tristan
    [J]. GLAND SURGERY, 2019, 8 (04) : 416 - 424
  • [29] Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Matros, Evan
    Fine, Neil
    Buchel, Edward
    Gordillo, Gayle M.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    Kim, Hyungjin M.
    Qi, Ji
    Albornoz, Claudia
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (22) : 2499 - +
  • [30] Immediate Placement of Implants in Breast Reconstruction: Patient Selection and Outcomes
    Roostaeian, Jason
    Pavone, Lucio
    Da Lio, Andrew
    Lipa, Joan
    Festekjian, Jaco
    Crisera, Christopher
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 127 (04) : 1407 - 1416