Research on the mechanism and path of the coupling of digital technology and environmental regulation to promote urban green efficiency

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Xiufan [1 ]
Yin, Shi [2 ]
Li, Meng [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Baoding 071000, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Digital technology; Environmental regulation; Urban green development; Coupling coordination degree; INFORMATION; INNOVATION; SMART; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2024.105906
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Digital technology, renowned for its embeddedness and integration, revolutionizes governance ideas, institutions, and models. Based on the panel data of 285 cities in China from 2007 to 2021, a panel vector autoregressive model (PVaR) is built to reveal the interaction mechanism between digital technology and environmental regulation. The fixed-effects panel model explored the green impact of the coupling of digital technology and environmental regulation, considering the mediating role of industrial upgrading, factor allocation, and public participation. The results show that digital technology and environmental regulation promote each other. The coupling of digital technology and environmental regulation enhances urban green efficiency, especially in economically advanced and eastern regions. Industrial upgrading, factor allocation, and public participation mediate this effect. Therefore, government departments should build ecological civilization by improving environmental management decision-making, promoting the deep integration of digital technology and environmental regulation, and exploring a new path of urban green development.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How does environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in enterprises? A policy simulation approach with an evolutionary game
    Zhang, Zhenhua
    Shi, Ke
    Gao, Yue
    Feng, Yanchao
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 68 (05) : 979 - 1008
  • [42] Does Public Environmental Attention Improve Green Investment Efficiency?-Based on the Perspective of Environmental Regulation and Environmental Responsibility
    Pan, Kang
    He, Feng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [43] The Research on Control Mechanism to Environmental Regulation and High-tech Enterprises Technology Innovation
    Ding Ying-ying
    Wang Yu-jing
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (ICMSE), 2014, : 1720 - 1724
  • [44] Research on Digital Technology in Environmental Art Design
    Huang, Xi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINERY, MATERIALS AND COMPUTER (MACMC 2017), 2017, 150 : 133 - 136
  • [45] Environmental regulation, green technology innovation and enterprise performance
    Wang, Guancheng
    Feng, Xun
    Tian, Li Grace
    Tu, Yongqian
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 68
  • [46] Environmental regulation, import trade, and green technology innovation
    Shang, Lina
    Tan, Deqing
    Feng, Suling
    Zhou, Wenting
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (09) : 12864 - 12874
  • [47] Environmental regulation, import trade, and green technology innovation
    Lina Shang
    Deqing Tan
    Suling Feng
    Wenting Zhou
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 12864 - 12874
  • [48] Does Environmental Regulation Promote the Upgrade of the Export Technology Structure: Evidence from China
    Yang, Yingzhu
    Wang, Qunhao
    Gao, Yang
    Zhao, Lexiang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [49] The role of information and communication technology on green total factor energy efficiency: Does environmental regulation work?
    Hao, Yu
    Guo, Yunxia
    Wu, Haitao
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (01) : 403 - 424
  • [50] The effect of global value chain position on green technology innovation efficiency: From the perspective of environmental regulation
    Hu, Dianxi
    Jiao, Jianling
    Tang, Yunshu
    Han, Xiaofei
    Sun, Huaping
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 121