Equity of financial protection for health in high-income countries: scoping review protocol

被引:0
作者
Xie, Edward C. [1 ,2 ]
Ali, Shehzad [3 ,4 ]
Law, Michael [5 ]
Allin, Sara [1 ]
Proano, Diego [6 ]
Sander, Beate [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Publ Hlth Econ Res, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Epidemiol & Biostat, , United Kingdom, London, ON, Canada
[4] Univ York, Fac Sci, Hlth Sci, York, England
[5] Univ British Columbia, Ctr Hlth Serv & Policy Res, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Hlth Econ & Technol Assessment THETA Coll, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 11期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Health Equity; Health policy; Health economics; Health Services Accessibility; PROGRESS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Financial protection (FP) is a central function of health systems to enhance access to essential care and improve health equity. We aim to characterise evidence on the distribution of FP in high-income countries as well as how equity of FP is conceptualised and measured in these settings. Findings from this review can advance methodological and conceptual knowledge about equity in FP, guide the evaluation of health systems and inform policy on eliminating inequitable barriers to care to achieve universal health coverage.Methods and analysis We will undertake a scoping review following guidance from Colquhoun et al and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. We will search four academic databases covering health sciences and economic literature as well as four grey literature sources for relevant publications. Screening for eligibility will be performed independently by two reviewers after calibration of screening criteria. Data will be charted using a standardised form and summarised by thematic analysis.Ethics and dissemination Institutional research ethics review was not required; however, research ethics will be considered iteratively throughout the research process. Research findings will be disseminated to scientific and policy meetings, summarised for lay audiences and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Universal health coverage from multiple perspectives: a synthesis of conceptual literature and global debates
    Abiiro, Gilbert Abotisem
    De Allegri, Manuela
    [J]. BMC INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 2015, 15
  • [2] Scoping review of the World Health Organization's underlying equity discourses: apparent ambiguities, inadequacy, and contradictions
    Amri, Michelle M.
    Jessiman-Perreault, Genevieve
    Siddiqi, Arjumand
    O'Campo, Patricia
    Enright, Theresa
    Di Ruggiero, Erica
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [3] Identifying priorities for research on financial risk protection to achieve universal health coverage: a scoping overview of reviews
    Bhatia, Dominika
    Mishra, Sujata
    Kirubarajan, Abirami
    Yanful, Bernice
    Allin, Sara
    Di Ruggiero, Erica
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [4] Booth A., 2012, Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
  • [5] Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting
    Colquhoun, Heather L.
    Levac, Danielle
    O'Brien, Kelly K.
    Straus, Sharon
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Perrier, Laure
    Kastner, Monika
    Moher, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (12) : 1291 - 1294
  • [6] Cookson R., 2021, Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
  • [7] Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Address Health Equity Concerns
    Cookson, Richard
    Mirelman, Andrew J.
    Griffin, Susan
    Asaria, Miqdad
    Dawkins, Bryony
    Norheim, Ole Frithjof
    Verguet, Stephane
    Culyer, Anthony J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (02) : 206 - 212
  • [8] Catastrophic health spending in Europe: equity and policy implications of different calculation methods
    Cylus, Jonathan
    Thomson, Sarah
    Evetovits, Tamas
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2018, 96 (09) : 599 - 609
  • [9] Eozenou P., 2019, The 2019 update of the health equity and financial protection indicators database: an overview
  • [10] The impact of public health insurance on health care utilisation, financial protection and health status in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
    Erlangga, Darius
    Suhrcke, Marc
    Ali, Shehzad
    Bloor, Karen
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (08):