The evaluation of the two-dimensional gamma passing rate efficiency for the unilateral breast cancer dosimetry using the Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

被引:0
作者
Al-Wakeel, Afnan Fouad [1 ,2 ]
Al Musawi, Mustafa Salih [1 ,2 ]
Alabedi, Hayder Hamza [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Al Andalus Private Hosp, Baghdad, Iraq
[2] Mustansiriyah Univ, Dept Physiol, Baghdad, Iraq
[3] Baghdad Univ, Dept Surg, Baghdad, Iraq
关键词
Unilateral Breast; Tomography; Radiotherapy; IMRT;
D O I
10.47391/JPMA-BAGH-16-73
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the commonly used two-dimensional gamma passing rate of 3%/3mm for females with unilateral breast cancer. Method: The cross-sectional study was conducted at Al-Andalus Private Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq, from November 2021 to April 2022 after approval from the Medical Physics and Physiology Department of Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, and comprised female patients with unilateral breast carcinomas. All the patients were subjected to a computed tomography simulation, and data was transferred to treatment planning system Monaco 5.1 for contouring and planning. An intensity-modulated radiation therapy method was selected. The planning comprised phantom detector and linear agility accelerator for pre-treatment verification. All patients were evaluated using two alternative dosimetry methods: 3%/3mm and 3%/2mm at the threshold of 10% and 5%. The Two-dimensional gamma analysis took each transversal slice in the simulation image for comparison. Data was analysed using SPSS 24. Results: There were 15 female patients aged 26-65 years. There was a better impact of 3%/3mm compared to 3%/2mm criterion for 5% and 10% thresholds. The proportion was 10% higher than the cutoff point of 5%. Conclusion: The 3%/2mm criterion should be used for plans that give a high dosage to organs at risk, while the 3 %/3 mm criterion should be used for uncomplicated situations with moderate dosages to at-risk organs.
引用
收藏
页码:S318 / S321
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Abdulbaqi A, 2021, Iran J Med Phys, V18, P226, DOI [10.22038/ijmp.2020.44712.1690, DOI 10.22038/IJMP.2020.44712.1690, 10.22038/IJMP.2020.44712.1690]
  • [2] Al Alani EA, 2021, J PAK MED ASSOC, V71, pS117
  • [3] Alani EA, 2020, PERIOD TCHE QUIM, V17, P128
  • [4] Dosimetric assessment of IMRT treatment planning for unilateral breast cancer patient using Octavius phantom detector
    Alwakeel, Afnan F.
    Al Musawi, Mustafa S.
    Alabedi, Haydar H.
    Mohammed, Husam Jasim
    [J]. APPLIED NANOSCIENCE, 2021, 13 (1) : 549 - 549
  • [5] Statistical variability and confidence intervals for planar dose QA pass rates
    Bailey, Daniel W.
    Nelms, Benjamin E.
    Attwood, Kristopher
    Kumaraswamy, Lalith
    Podgorsak, Matthew B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (11) : 6053 - 6064
  • [6] Claudino WM, 2007, Eur J Cancer, V16, P94, DOI [10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00680.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2354.2006.00680.X]
  • [7] Dyk JV, 2013, Radiation Oncology Medical Physics Resources for Working, Teaching, and Learning. The Modern Technology of Radiation Oncology, V1st, P1
  • [8] IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119
    Ezzell, Gary A.
    Burmeister, Jay W.
    Dogan, Nesrin
    LoSasso, Thomas J.
    Mechalakos, James G.
    Mihailidis, Dimitris
    Molineu, Andrea
    Palta, Jatinder R.
    Ramsey, Chester R.
    Salter, Bill J.
    Shi, Jie
    Xia, Ping
    Yue, Ning J.
    Xiao, Ying
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) : 5359 - 5373
  • [9] Faraj Moneer K, 2023, Surg Neurol Int, V14, P188, DOI 10.25259/SNI_1053_2022
  • [10] Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT
    Low, Daniel A.
    Moran, Jean M.
    Dempsey, James F.
    Dong, Lei
    Oldham, Mark
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (03) : 1313 - 1338