Delineation of Groundwater Potential Using the Bivariate Statistical Models and Hybridized Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models

被引:0
|
作者
Kocyigit, Musteyde Baduna [1 ]
Akay, Huseyin [1 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
groundwater potential mapping; multi-criteria decision-making methods; bivariate statistics; frequency ratio; weight of evidence; Burdur Lake catchment; TOPSIS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; GIS; REGION; ZONES;
D O I
10.3390/w16223273
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Identifying groundwater potential zones in a basin and developing a sustainable management plan is becoming more important, especially where surface water is scarce. The main aim of the study is to prepare the groundwater potential maps (GWPMs) considering the bivariate statistical models of frequency ratio (FR), weight of evidence (WoE), and the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) hybridized with FR and WoE. Two distance measures, Euclidean and Manhattan, were used in TOPSIS to evaluate their effect on GWPMs. The research focused on the Burdur Lake catchment located in the southwest of T & uuml;rkiye. In total, 74 wells with high yields were chosen randomly for the analysis, 52 (70%) for training, and 22 (30%) for testing processes. Sixteen groundwater conditioning factors were selected. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and true skill statistics (TSS) were utilized to examine the goodness-of-fit and prediction accuracy of approaches. The TOPSIS-WoE-Manhattan model and the FR and WoE models gave the best AUROC values of 0.915 and 0.944 for the training and testing processes, respectively. The best TSS values of 0.827 and 0.864 were obtained by the TOPSIS-FR-Euclidean and WoE models for the training and testing processes, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New DRASTIC framework for groundwater vulnerability assessment: bivariate and multi-criteria decision-making approach coupled with metaheuristic algorithm
    Lakshminarayanan, Balaji
    Ramasamy, Saravanan
    Anuthaman, Sreemanthrarupini Nariangadu
    Karuppanan, Saravanan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (03) : 4474 - 4496
  • [42] Geospatial analysis of groundwater potential zones using GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making AHP approach
    Nandi, Debabrata
    Sing, Debasish
    Sahu, Pramod Chandra
    SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, 10 (04)
  • [43] Groundwater potential assessment in the Blue Nile River catchment, Ethiopia, using geospatial and multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Tamesgen, Yohanis
    Atlabachew, Abunu
    Jothimani, Muralitharan
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (06)
  • [44] Landslide susceptibility assessment for Uttarakhand, a Himalayan state of India, using multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, and machine learning models
    Chauhan, Vipin
    Gupta, Laxmi
    Dixit, Jagabandhu
    GEOENVIRONMENTAL DISASTERS, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [45] Reservoir Optimization for Energy Production Using a New Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models
    Mohammad Ehteram
    Hojat Karami
    Saeed Farzin
    Water Resources Management, 2018, 32 : 2539 - 2560
  • [46] Reservoir Optimization for Energy Production Using a New Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models
    Ehteram, Mohammad
    Karami, Hojat
    Farzin, Saeed
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (07) : 2539 - 2560
  • [47] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models for Assessment of Education Quality in Water Resources Engineering
    Ghorbani, Mohammad Kazem
    Talebbeydokhti, Nasser
    Hamidifar, Hossein
    Samadi, Mehrshad
    Nones, Michael
    Rezaeitavabe, Fatemeh
    Heidarifar, Shabnam
    ALGORITHMS, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [48] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models for the Evaluation Cultural Websites: A Framework for Comparative Analysis
    Kabassi, Katerina
    INFORMATION, 2021, 12 (10)
  • [49] INTEGRITY MITIGATION PRIORITIZATION USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Mehranfer, Mahsa
    Mejia, Juan
    Hassanien, Sherif
    Martin, James
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2019, VOL 7, 2019,
  • [50] Drone selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Khan, Muhammad Sohaib
    Shah, Syed Irtiza Ali
    Javed, Ali
    Qadri, Nafees Mumtaz
    Hussain, Nadeem
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 256 - 270