Delineation of Groundwater Potential Using the Bivariate Statistical Models and Hybridized Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models

被引:0
|
作者
Kocyigit, Musteyde Baduna [1 ]
Akay, Huseyin [1 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
groundwater potential mapping; multi-criteria decision-making methods; bivariate statistics; frequency ratio; weight of evidence; Burdur Lake catchment; TOPSIS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; GIS; REGION; ZONES;
D O I
10.3390/w16223273
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Identifying groundwater potential zones in a basin and developing a sustainable management plan is becoming more important, especially where surface water is scarce. The main aim of the study is to prepare the groundwater potential maps (GWPMs) considering the bivariate statistical models of frequency ratio (FR), weight of evidence (WoE), and the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) hybridized with FR and WoE. Two distance measures, Euclidean and Manhattan, were used in TOPSIS to evaluate their effect on GWPMs. The research focused on the Burdur Lake catchment located in the southwest of T & uuml;rkiye. In total, 74 wells with high yields were chosen randomly for the analysis, 52 (70%) for training, and 22 (30%) for testing processes. Sixteen groundwater conditioning factors were selected. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and true skill statistics (TSS) were utilized to examine the goodness-of-fit and prediction accuracy of approaches. The TOPSIS-WoE-Manhattan model and the FR and WoE models gave the best AUROC values of 0.915 and 0.944 for the training and testing processes, respectively. The best TSS values of 0.827 and 0.864 were obtained by the TOPSIS-FR-Euclidean and WoE models for the training and testing processes, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Groundwater Assessment Multi-criteria decision making
    Tanti, Kamal Kumar
    Singh, Prashant
    Roy, Swarnendu
    Chetia, Monisha
    Machahary, Ratamali
    Jhariya, Dalchand
    Chanu, Tongbram Malemnganbi
    Bora, Porag
    Gogoi, Priti Rekha
    Sah, Puja
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2020, 118 (05): : 693 - 693
  • [32] Study on Undecided Multi-criteria Decision-making Based on Compatibility Relations Theory Models
    Huang Zhi-li
    Luo Jian
    Tian Le
    2013 25TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2013, : 1648 - 1653
  • [33] Appraising the accuracy of GIS-based Multi-criteria decision making technique for delineation of Groundwater potential zones
    Tarun Kumar
    Amar Kant Gautam
    Tinu Kumar
    Water Resources Management, 2014, 28 : 4449 - 4466
  • [34] Preferential Selection of Software Quality Models Based on a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Verma, Ankita
    Agarwal, Anushka
    Rathore, Manisha
    Bisht, Sneha
    Singh, Deepti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE INNOVATION, 2023, 11 (01) : 26 - 26
  • [35] Novel fuzzy rough set models and corresponding applications to multi-criteria decision-making
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhan, Jianming
    Wu, Wei-Zhi
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2020, 383 : 92 - 126
  • [36] Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models: Analyzing the Steps in the Domain of Websites' Evaluation
    Kabassi, Katerina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2022, 21 (02) : 729 - 753
  • [37] Appraising the accuracy of GIS-based Multi-criteria decision making technique for delineation of Groundwater potential zones
    Kumar, Tarun
    Gautam, Amar Kant
    Kumar, Tinu
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (13) : 4449 - 4466
  • [38] Multi-criteria models with trend evaluation in decision making support
    Bodnarova, Agata
    Gavalec, Martin
    Mls, Karel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS 2011, PTS I AND II, 2011, : 47 - 52
  • [39] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method for Models with the Dominant Criterion
    Zizovic, Miodrag M.
    Damljanovic, Nada
    Zizovic, Malisa R.
    FILOMAT, 2017, 31 (10) : 2981 - 2989
  • [40] New DRASTIC framework for groundwater vulnerability assessment: bivariate and multi-criteria decision-making approach coupled with metaheuristic algorithm
    Balaji Lakshminarayanan
    Saravanan Ramasamy
    Sreemanthrarupini Nariangadu Anuthaman
    Saravanan Karuppanan
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 4474 - 4496