Preliminary Results on the Use of Straw Cover and Effective Microorganisms for Mitigating GHG and Ammonia Emissions in Pig Slurry Storage Systems

被引:2
作者
Turbi, Martire Angelica Terrero [1 ]
Gomez-Garrido, Melisa [1 ]
El Bied, Oumaima [1 ]
Bencosme, Jose Gregorio Cuevas [1 ]
Cano, angel Faz [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Cartagena, Agron Engn Dept, Sustainable Use Management & Reclamat Soil & Water, Paseo Alfonso XIII 48, Cartagena 30203, Spain
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 10期
关键词
GHG emission; ammonia; pig slurry storage; emission-mitigation techniques; straw cover; effective microorganism; GAS EMISSIONS; METHANE EMISSION; FLOATING COVERS; GREENHOUSE-GAS; NITROUS-OXIDE; MANURE; ACIDIFICATION; REDUCTION; AERATION;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture14101788
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Spain has been the largest pork producer in the EU in recent years, leading to significant pig slurry (PS) production that requires proper management to prevent environmental impacts. The objectives of this study were to quantify greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia emissions and to characterize the PS in storage pond systems. A straw cover pond (SP) and addition of effective microorganisms (EMs) in a biological pond (BP) were used to treat the slurries. During two periods (autumn and spring), PS was characterized and GHG (CO2, CH4, N2O) and NH3 emissions were measured with a dynamic chamber. After 5 weeks of storage, BP achieved a reduction of 96% for CO2, 98% for CH4 and 59% for NH3 compared to the control pond (CP) in spring, while SP presented a 74% reduction for CO2 in autumn, and 60% and 97% reductions for CH4 and NH3, respectively, in spring. Additionally, the PS samples showed a decreasing trend for EC, dry matter, COD, BOD5, total N, NH4+-N, Org.-N, NO3--N, and PO43- during both seasons. This preliminary study shows promise in reducing GHG/NH3 emissions and improving PS properties, but further replication is recommended. Varying straw cover thickness, optimizing EM dose, and a pH reduction may enhance outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Adamsen A.P.S., 2018, Verification of Environmental Technologies for Agricultural Production VERA TEST PROTOCOL Covers and Other Mitigation Technologies for Reduction of Gaseous Emissions from Stored Manure, P1
[2]   Additives and methods for the mitigation of methane emission from stored liquid manure [J].
Ambrose, Herald Wilson ;
Dalby, Frederik R. ;
Feilberg, Anders ;
Kofoed, Michael V. W. .
BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2023, 229 :209-245
[3]   Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment [J].
Amon, B ;
Kryvoruchko, V ;
Amon, T ;
Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 112 (2-3) :153-162
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1980, German Standard Methods for Examination of Water, Waste Water and Sludge
[5]  
Summary Action and Material Characteristic Parameters (Group H)
[6]  
Determination of the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) in the Range over 15 mg/L (H41)
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Water QualityDetermination of the Chemical Oxygen Demand Index (ST-COD)Small-Scale Sealed Tube Method
[8]  
APHA, 2005, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, DOI DOI 10.2105/AJPH.51.6.940-A
[9]   Potential application of lactic acid bacteria in water treatment systems [J].
Balboa Luna, Cristian ;
Vergara-Gonzalez, Luis .
ECOSISTEMAS, 2021, 30 (02)
[10]   Reduction of Methane Emission during Slurry Storage by the Addition of Effective Microorganisms and Excessive Carbon Source from Brewing Sugar [J].
Bastami, Mohd Saufi B. ;
Jones, Davey L. ;
Chadwick, David R. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2016, 45 (06) :2016-2022