Quality Assessment of Digital Health Apps:Umbrella Review

被引:0
作者
Zych, Maciej Marek [1 ]
Bond, Raymond [1 ]
Mulvenna, Maurice [1 ]
Carracedo, Jorge Martinez [1 ]
Bai, Lu [2 ]
Leigh, Simon [3 ]
机构
[1] Ulster Univ, Sch Comp, 2-24 York St, Belfast BT15 1AP, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Elect Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Belfast, North Ireland
[3] ORCHA, Daresbury, England
关键词
mHealth assessment; digital health; quality assessment; health apps quality; assessment criteria; evaluation criteria; health apps criteria; assessment; digital health app; app; umbrella review; risk; mobile phone; frameworks; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; MOBILE;
D O I
10.2196/58616
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: With an increasing number of digital health apps available in app stores, it is important to assess these technologies reliably regarding their quality. This is done to mitigate the risks associated with their use. There are many different guidelines, methods, and metrics available to assess digital health apps with regard to their quality. Objective: This study aimed to give a holistic summary of the current methods and "condition agnostic" frameworks that arebroadly applicable for the quality assessment of all digital health apps.Methods: A systematic search of literature was conducted on 4 databases: Scopus, PubMed, ACM Digital Library, and IEE EXplore. We followed the PICOS (Population, Patient, or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcomes; and Study Design) and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodologies when conducting this umbrell are view. The search was conducted on January 26, 2024, for review articles published between 2018 and 2023. We identified 4781candidate papers for inclusion; after title and abstract screening, 39 remained. After full-text analysis, we included 15 review articles in the full review .Results: Of the 15 review articles, scoping reviews were the most common (n=6, 40%), followed by systematic reviews (n=4,27%), narrative reviews (n=4, 27%), and a rapid review (n=1, 7%). A total of 4 (27%) review articles proposed assessment criteria for digital health apps. "Data privacy and/or security" was the most mentioned criterion (n=13, 87%) and "Cost" was the least mentioned criterion (n=1, 7%) for the assessment of digital health apps. The Mobile App Rating Scale was the most frequently used framework for quality assessment of digital health apps. Conclusions: There is a lack of unity or consolidation across identified frameworks, as most do not meet all the identified criteria from the reviewed articles. Safety concerns associated with the use of digital health apps may be mitigated with the useof quality frameworks
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review
    Akbar, Saba
    Coiera, Enrico
    Magrabi, Farah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (02) : 330 - 340
  • [2] Challenges With Developing Secure Mobile Health Applications: Systematic Review
    Aljedaani, Bakheet
    Babar, Ali
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2021, 9 (06):
  • [3] [Anonymous], Evidence standards framework for digital health technologies | our programmes | what we do | about | NICE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, ISO/TS 82304-2
  • [5] [Anonymous], Mobile health index and navigation database, app evaluation resources
  • [6] [Anonymous], The NHS long term plan and COVID-19
  • [7] [Anonymous], Regulating medical devices in the UK
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2017, CHECKLIST SYSTEMATIC
  • [9] Aromataris E., 2024, JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, DOI [10.46658/JBIMES-24-01, DOI 10.46658/JBIMES-24-01]
  • [10] Mobile health app usability and quality rating scales: a systematic review
    Azad-Khaneghah, Peyman
    Neubauer, Noelannah
    Cruz, Antonio Miguel
    Liu, Lili
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 16 (07) : 712 - 721