Technologies to support nursing students in learning Standardized Nursing Languages: A systematic literature review

被引:1
|
作者
Zeffiro, Valentina [1 ]
Tempesta, Salvatore [1 ]
Morandini, Roberta [1 ]
Alvaro, Rosaria [1 ]
Vellone, Ercole [1 ]
Pucciarelli, Gianluca [1 ]
D'Agostino, Fabio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Biomed & Prevent, Rome, Italy
[2] St Camillus Int Univ Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Med & Surg, Rome, Italy
关键词
educational outcomes; educational technology; nursing process; nursing students; Standardized Nursing Languages; CRITICAL THINKING; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; DECISION-MAKING; OMAHA SYSTEM; EDUCATION; DOCUMENTATION; CARE; SIMULATION; OUTCOMES; TERMINOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1111/2047-3095.70001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimThis review identifies technologies used to teach Standardized Nursing Languages and their impact on nursing students' educational outcomes.MethodsA literature review, updated to June 14, 2024, was conducted by consulting the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The main inclusion criterion was primary studies in which technology was used to educate students on Standardized Nursing Languages.ResultsThree types of technology were addressed: Computerized Aids and Electronic Devices, Decision Support Systems, and Diagnostic Reasoning Software. Most of these technologies were found to positively impact knowledge, performance, application of the nursing process, diagnostic accuracy, and clinical reasoning.Conclusions and implications for nursing educationIntegrating technology into nursing education enhances nursing students' skills and equips them to handle the digital aspects of modern health care. Technologies must support all stages of the nursing process, reinforce clinical reasoning, and offer timely feedback. Additionally, the presence of teachers during technology training is crucial to ensure proper functioning, provide technical support, manage the learning environment, and verify students' skills. Nursing students with technological skills will become nurses capable of producing complete and quality clinical documentation and supporting their professional achievements. ObiettivoQuesta revisione identifica le tecnologie utilizzate per insegnare i linguaggi infermieristici standardizzati agli studenti del corso di laurea in Infermieristica e il loro impatto sui risultati educativi.Metodi & Egrave; stata condotta una revisione della letteratura, aggiornata al 14 giugno 2024, consultando i database PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus e Cochrane. Il principale criterio di inclusione era costituito da studi primari in cui la tecnologia veniva utilizzata per istruire gli studenti sui linguaggi infermieristici standardizzati.RisultatiSi & egrave; scoperto che la maggior parte di queste tecnologie ha un impatto positivo sulla conoscenza, sulle prestazioni, sull'applicazione del processo infermieristico, sull'accuratezza diagnostica e sul ragionamento clinico.Conclusioni e implicazioni per la formazione infermieristicaL'integrazione della tecnologia nella formazione infermieristica migliora le competenze degli studenti e li equipaggia per gestire gli aspetti digitali dell'assistenza sanitaria moderna. Le tecnologie devono supportare tutte le fasi del processo infermieristico, rafforzare il ragionamento clinico e offrire un feedback tempestivo. Inoltre, la presenza di docenti durante la formazione & egrave; fondamentale per garantire il corretto funzionamento della tecnologia, fornire supporto tecnico, gestire l'ambiente di apprendimento e verificare le competenze degli studenti. Gli studenti con competenze tecnologiche diventeranno infermieri in grado di produrre una documentazione clinica completa e di qualit & agrave; e supportare scientificamente i loro risultati professionali.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The learning experiences of international students in nursing and midwifery programs: A literature review
    Eden, Amye
    Fleet, Julie-Anne
    Cominos, Nayia
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2021, 52
  • [32] Impact of experiential dementia care learning on knowledge, skills and attitudes of nursing students: A systematic literature review
    Adewuyi, Modupe
    Morales, Kathleen
    Lindsey, Anna
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2022, 62
  • [33] Learning from nursing students' experiences and perceptions of their clinical placements in nursing homes: An integrative literature review
    Cooke, Julie
    Greenway, Kathleen
    Schutz, Sue
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 100
  • [34] Efficacy of teaching methods used to develop critical thinking in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: A systematic review of the literature
    Carter, Amanda G.
    Creedy, Debra K.
    Sidebotham, Mary
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2016, 40 : 209 - 218
  • [35] A Systematic Review of the Use of Standardized Patients as a Simulation Modality in Nursing Education
    Rutherford-Hemming, Tonya
    Alfes, Celeste M.
    Breymier, Tonya L.
    NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 40 (02) : 84 - 90
  • [36] The role of manikins in nursing students ' learning: A systematic review and thematic metasynthesis
    Handeland, Jorunn A.
    Prinz, Andreas
    Ekra, Else Mari R.
    Fossum, Mariann
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 98
  • [37] Simulation with standardized patients to prepare undergraduate nursing students for mental health clinical practice: An integrative literature review
    Ogard-Repal, Anita
    De Presno, Asne Knutson
    Fossum, Mariann
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 66 : 149 - 157
  • [38] The learning experiences of international doctoral students with particular reference to nursing students: A literature review
    Evans, Catrin
    Stevenson, Keith
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (02) : 239 - 250
  • [39] How pre-registration nursing students acquire delegation skills: A systematic literature review
    Clarke, Helen
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 106
  • [40] Effect of simulation training on the development of nurses and nursing students' critical thinking: A systematic literature review
    Adib-Hajbaghery, Mohsen
    Sharifi, Najmeh
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2017, 50 : 17 - 24