Weak lensing of strong lensing: beyond the tidal regime

被引:0
作者
Duboscq, Theo [1 ,2 ]
Hogg, Natalie B. [1 ,2 ]
Fleury, Pierre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Larena, Julien [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, UMR 5299, Lab Univers & Particules Montpellier LUPM, F-34095 Montpellier 05, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, UMR 5299, Parvis Alexander Grothendieck, F-34095 Montpellier 05, France
[3] Univ Paris Saclay, CNRS, CEA, Inst Phys Theor, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
来源
JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS | 2024年 / 08期
关键词
gravitational lensing; weak gravitational lensing; SUBSTRUCTURE; PARAMETER; SHAPELETS;
D O I
10.1088/1475-7516/2024/08/021
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The analysis of strong lensing images usually involves an external convergence and shear, which are meant to model the effect of perturbations along the line of sight, on top of the main lens. Such a description of line-of-sight perturbations supposes that the corresponding gravitational fields can be treated in the tidal regime. Going one step further introduces additional effects, known as flexion, which have been hitherto neglected in strong lensing. In this work, we build a minimal model for the line-of-sight flexion, which adds four new complex parameters to the lens model. Contrary to convergence and shear, the line-of-sight flexion cannot be projected onto the main lens plane. For a Lambda CDM cosmology, we predict the typical line-of-sight flexion to be on the order of 10(-3) arcsec(-1) on galactic scales. Neglecting its effect in lens modelling is found to bias the recovery of other parameters; in particular, the line-of-sight shear can be biased up to 2 sigma. Accounting for the line-of-sight flexion in our minimal framework restores accuracy, at the cost of degrading precision. With current imaging capabilities, the line-of-sight flexion is unlikely to be measurable on individual strong lensing images; it must therefore be considered a nuisance parameter rather than an observable in its own right.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys, Open J. Astrophys, 2023 6
  • [2] Planck Collaboration Aghanim N., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys, (2020)
  • [3] Refsdal S., On the possibility of determining Hubble's parameter and the masses of galaxies from the gravitational lens effect, (1964)
  • [4] Wong Kenneth C., H0LiCOW - XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3 tension between early- and late-Universe probes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc, (2020)
  • [5] Millon M., TDCOSMO. I. An exploration of systematic uncertainties in the inference of H_0 from time-delay cosmography, Astron. Astrophys, 639, (2020)
  • [6] Birrer S., TDCOSMO - IV. Hierarchical time-delay cosmography - joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles, Astron. Astrophys, 643, (2020)
  • [7] Vegetti S., Koopmans L. V. E., Bolton A., Treu T., Gavazzi R., Detection of a Dark Substructure through Gravitational Imaging Mon, Not. Roy. Astron. Soc, (2010)
  • [8] Cyr-Racine Francis-Yan Moustakas Leonidas A., Keeton Charles R., Sigurdson Kris Gilman Daniel A., Dark census: Statistically detecting the satellite populations of distant galaxies, Phys. Rev. D, 94, (2016)
  • [9] Nightingale James W., Scanning for dark matter subhaloes in Hubble Space Telescope imaging of 54 strong lenses, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc, 527, (2023)
  • [10] Vegetti S., Strong gravitational lensing as a probe of dark matter 2023