Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction of Bilaterally Implanted Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens: Outcomes of a Multicenter Registry

被引:2
作者
Howes, Frank [1 ]
Rementeria-Capelo, Laureano A. [2 ]
Poyales, Francisco [3 ]
Borovik, Armand [4 ]
Khoramnia, Ramin [5 ]
Perez-Vives, Caridad [6 ]
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A. [7 ]
机构
[1] Eye & Laser Ctr Gold Coast, Southport, Qld, Australia
[2] Rementeria Clin, Madrid, Spain
[3] Miranza IOA, Madrid, Spain
[4] Southern Ophthalmol Specialist Eye Surg, Sydney, Australia
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Alcon Vis LLC, Ft Worth, TX USA
[7] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, Univ Eye Clin Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.3928/1081597X-20241230-01
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate visual performance, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence in patients bilaterally implanted with AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lenses (IOLs) (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) during cataract or refractive lens exchange (RLE) surgery. METHODS: This multicenter, ambispective, non-interventional registry study was conducted in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. At the first follow-up visit, occurring between 3 and 6 months after IOL implantation, binocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities at distance (UDVA/CDVA), intermediate (UIVA/DIVA 66 cm), and near (UNVA/DNVA 40 cm) were evaluated using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) chart. Patient satisfaction, spectacle independence, visual disturbances, and device deficiencies were also assessed. RESULTS: The final analysis included 885 patients, with 790 (89.3%) and 82 (9.3%) patients who underwent cataract and RLE, respectively, where approximately 30% had one or more ocular comorbidity. Mean +/- standard deviation logMAR (Snellen) UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA were 0.012 +/- 0.102 (similar to 20/20), 0.088 +/- 0.118 (similar to 20/25), and 0.256 +/- 0.154 (similar to 20/40) for the cataract cohort and-0.005 +/- 0.088 (similar to 20/20), 0.054 +/- 0.141 (similar to 20/25), and 0.213 +/- 0.151 (similar to 20/32) for the RLE cohort, respectively. The proportion of patients reporting spectacle independence at distance, intermediate, and near was 87.9%, 77.6%, and 46.1% for the cataract and 86.6%, 79.3%, and 59.8% for the RLE cohorts. The majority of patients among the cataract (92.1%) and RLE (85.4%) cohorts were satisfied with their postoperative sight, whereas 91.8% of the cataract and 84.1% of the RLE cohort reported no visual disturbances. No device deficiencies were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, patients bilaterally implanted with AcrySof IQ Vivity IOLs demonstrated good visual performance and the majority reported spectacle independence for distance to intermediate, high visual satisfaction, and low levels of visual disturbances across both cohorts, despite approximately 30% who reported 1 or greater ocular comorbidity.ocular comorbidity. Mean +/- standard deviation logMAR (Snellen) UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA were 0.012 +/- 0.102 (similar to 20/20), 0.088 +/- 0.118 (similar to 20/25), and 0.256 +/- 0.154 (similar to 20/40) for the cataract cohort and-0.005 +/- 0.088 (similar to 20/20), 0.054 +/- 0.141 (similar to 20/25), and 0.213 +/- 0.151 (similar to 20/32) for the RLE cohort, respectively. The proportion of patients reporting spectacle independence at distance, intermediate, and near was 87.9%, 77.6%, and 46.1% for the cataract and 86.6%, 79.3%, and 59.8% for the RLE cohorts. The majority of patients among the cataract (92.1%) and RLE (85.4%) cohorts were satisfied with their postoperative sight, whereas 91.8% of the cataract and 84.1% of the RLE cohort reported no visual disturbances. No device deficiencies were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, patients bilaterally implanted with AcrySof IQ Vivity IOLs demonstrated good visual performance and the majority reported spectacle independence for distance to intermediate, high visual satisfaction, and low levels of visual disturbances across both cohorts, despite approximately 30% who reported 1 or greater ocular comorbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:e131 / e143
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Surgical options for correction of refractive error following cataract surgery [J].
Abdelghany, Ahmed A. ;
Alio, Jorge L. .
EYE AND VISION, 2014, 1
[2]   Extended depth of focus intraocular lenses for presbyopia [J].
Akella, Sruti S. ;
Juthani, Viral V. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 29 (04) :319-323
[3]  
Alcon Laboratories Inc, 2020, AcrySofTMIQ VivityTM Intraocular Lens (IOL) directions for use
[4]   Refractive lens exchange in modern practice: when and when not to do it? [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Grzybowski, Andrzej ;
Romaniuk, Dorota .
EYE AND VISION, 2014, 1
[5]   Extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) AcrySof® IQ Vivity® intraocular lens implant: a real-life experience [J].
Arrigo, Alessandro ;
Gambaro, Gianpiera ;
Fasce, Francesco ;
Aragona, Emanuela ;
Figini, Innocente ;
Bandello, Francesco .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 259 (09) :2717-2722
[6]   Multicountry clinical outcomes of a new nondiffractive presbyopia-correcting IOL [J].
Bala, Chandra ;
Poyales, Francisco ;
Guarro, Merce ;
Ruiz Mesa, Ramon ;
Mearza, Ali ;
Varma, Devesh Kumar ;
Jasti, Srichand ;
Lemp-Hull, Jessie .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (02) :136-143
[7]   Visualization of Ray Propagation through Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses [J].
Baur, Isabella D. ;
Auffarth, Gerd U. ;
Yan, Weijia ;
Labuz, Grzegorz ;
Khoramnia, Ramin .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (11)
[8]   Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction [J].
Calladine, Daniel ;
Evans, Jennifer R. ;
Shah, Sweata ;
Leyland, Martin .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (09)
[9]   Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction [J].
de Silva, Samantha R. ;
Evans, Jennifer R. ;
Kirthi, Varo ;
Ziaei, Mohammed ;
Leyland, Martin .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (12)
[10]   Visual performance, safety and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in presbyopic patients without cataract [J].
Fernandez, Joaquin ;
Alfonso Sanchez, Jose F. ;
Nieradzik, Mark ;
Valcarcel, Beatriz ;
Burguera, Noemi ;
Kapp, Alexander .
BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)