Radiologic placement of totally implantable venous access devices: Outcomes and complications from a large oncology cohort

被引:0
作者
Tashi, Sonam [1 ]
Tan, Alfred Bingchao [1 ]
Chua, Jasmine Ming Er [1 ]
Lim, Gek Hsiang [2 ]
Venkatanarasimha, Nanda [1 ]
Chandramohan, Sivanathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Vasc & Intervent Radiol, Outram Rd, Singapore 169608, Singapore
[2] Singapore Gen Hosp, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
complications; long-term venous access; oncology; ports; totally implantable venous access device; TIVAD; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; PORTS; METAANALYSIS; THROMBOSIS; CATHETERS; VEIN;
D O I
10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2024166
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) or ports are increasingly used in oncology settings to provide long-term, easy venous access. This study reports our experience and results with 1180 cases in Singapore. Method: Data from January 2019 to January 2022, obtained from a hospital-approved secure database application called the Research Electronic Data Capture registry, were reviewed and analysed retrospectively. Results: A total of 1180 patients underwent TIVAD implantation with a 100% technical success rate. The mean age of the cohort was 61.9 years. The mean dwell duration was 342 days (standard deviation [SD] 223; range 3-1911). By 1 February 2022, 83% of patients were still using the TIVAD, 13.6 % underwent removal after completion of treatment, 2.1% were removed due to infection, 0.6% due to malfunction, 0.6% due to port extrusion and 0.1% at patient's request. The right internal jugular vein (IJV) was the most commonly accessed site (83.6%), followed by the left IJV (15.6%). The early post-procedure complications were pain (24.7%), bruising (9.2%), swelling (3.6%), bleeding (0.5%), fever (0.4%), itchiness (0.2%) and allergic dermatitis (0.1%). The delayed post- procedure complications were TIVAD site cellulitis (3.80%); discharge (1.10%); skin erosion with device extrusion (0.60%); malpositioned catheter (0.33%), which was successfully repositioned, catheter-related bloodstream infections (0.25%); migration of TIVAD leading to catheter dislodgement (0.25%); venous thrombosis (0.25%); fibrin sheath formation requiring stripping (0.10%) and TIVAD chamber inversion (0.10%). Conclusion: TIVAD implantation via the jugular vein under radiological guidance provides a safe, reliable and convenient means of long-term venous access in oncology patients. By sharing our experience and acceptable outcomes from a large oncology cohort, we aim to increase the awareness and adoption of TIVAD usage in oncology patients, especially in Asia.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis after port insertion: What are the risk factors?
    Tabatabaie, Omidreza
    Kasumova, Gyulnara G.
    Kent, Tara S.
    Eskander, Mariam F.
    Fadayomi, Ayotunde B.
    Ng, Sing Chau
    Critchlow, Jonathan F.
    Tawa, Nicholas E.
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 162 (02) : 437 - 444
  • [22] A prospective observational study on 249 subcutaneous central vein access ports in a Swedish county hospital
    Taxbro, Knut
    Berg, Soren
    Hammarskjold, Fredrik
    Hanberger, Hakan
    Malmvall, Bo-Erik
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2013, 52 (05) : 893 - 901
  • [23] A comparison of clinical outcomes with regular- and low-profile totally implanted central venous port systems
    Teichgräber U.K.-M.
    Steitparth F.
    Cho C.H.
    Benter T.
    Gebauer B.
    [J]. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2009, 32 (5) : 975 - 979
  • [24] Tunneled infusion catheters: Increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after subclavian versus internal jugular venous access
    Trerotola, SO
    Kuhn-Fulton, J
    Johnson, MS
    Shah, H
    Ambrosius, WT
    Kneebone, PH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (01) : 89 - 93
  • [25] Venous Access Ports: Indications, Implantation Technique, Follow-Up, and Complications
    Walser, Eric M.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (04) : 751 - 764
  • [26] Whitman ED, 1996, CURR PROB SURG, V33, P313
  • [27] A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on choice of central venous access device for delivery of chemotherapy
    Yeow, Marcus
    Soh, Shauna
    Yap, Ryan
    Tay, Desiree
    Low, Yi Fen
    Goh, Serene Si Ning
    Yeo, Charleen Shanwen
    Lo, Zhiwen Joseph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2022, 10 (05) : 1184 - +
  • [28] Yeste Sanchez Luis, 2006, Clin Transl Oncol, V8, P735
  • [29] Yildizeli B, 2004, J Vasc Access, V5, P174
  • [30] Subcutaneous chest ports via the internal jugular vein - A retrospective study of 117 oncology patients
    Yip, D
    Funaki, B
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2002, 43 (04) : 371 - 375