Radiologic placement of totally implantable venous access devices: Outcomes and complications from a large oncology cohort

被引:1
作者
Tashi, Sonam [1 ]
Tan, Alfred Bingchao [1 ]
Chua, Jasmine Ming Er [1 ]
Lim, Gek Hsiang [2 ]
Venkatanarasimha, Nanda [1 ]
Chandramohan, Sivanathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Vasc & Intervent Radiol, Outram Rd, Singapore 169608, Singapore
[2] Singapore Gen Hosp, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
complications; long-term venous access; oncology; ports; totally implantable venous access device; TIVAD; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; PORTS; METAANALYSIS; THROMBOSIS; CATHETERS; VEIN;
D O I
10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2024166
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) or ports are increasingly used in oncology settings to provide long-term, easy venous access. This study reports our experience and results with 1180 cases in Singapore. Method: Data from January 2019 to January 2022, obtained from a hospital-approved secure database application called the Research Electronic Data Capture registry, were reviewed and analysed retrospectively. Results: A total of 1180 patients underwent TIVAD implantation with a 100% technical success rate. The mean age of the cohort was 61.9 years. The mean dwell duration was 342 days (standard deviation [SD] 223; range 3-1911). By 1 February 2022, 83% of patients were still using the TIVAD, 13.6 % underwent removal after completion of treatment, 2.1% were removed due to infection, 0.6% due to malfunction, 0.6% due to port extrusion and 0.1% at patient's request. The right internal jugular vein (IJV) was the most commonly accessed site (83.6%), followed by the left IJV (15.6%). The early post-procedure complications were pain (24.7%), bruising (9.2%), swelling (3.6%), bleeding (0.5%), fever (0.4%), itchiness (0.2%) and allergic dermatitis (0.1%). The delayed post- procedure complications were TIVAD site cellulitis (3.80%); discharge (1.10%); skin erosion with device extrusion (0.60%); malpositioned catheter (0.33%), which was successfully repositioned, catheter-related bloodstream infections (0.25%); migration of TIVAD leading to catheter dislodgement (0.25%); venous thrombosis (0.25%); fibrin sheath formation requiring stripping (0.10%) and TIVAD chamber inversion (0.10%). Conclusion: TIVAD implantation via the jugular vein under radiological guidance provides a safe, reliable and convenient means of long-term venous access in oncology patients. By sharing our experience and acceptable outcomes from a large oncology cohort, we aim to increase the awareness and adoption of TIVAD usage in oncology patients, especially in Asia.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis after port insertion: What are the risk factors? [J].
Tabatabaie, Omidreza ;
Kasumova, Gyulnara G. ;
Kent, Tara S. ;
Eskander, Mariam F. ;
Fadayomi, Ayotunde B. ;
Ng, Sing Chau ;
Critchlow, Jonathan F. ;
Tawa, Nicholas E. ;
Tseng, Jennifer F. .
SURGERY, 2017, 162 (02) :437-444
[22]   A prospective observational study on 249 subcutaneous central vein access ports in a Swedish county hospital [J].
Taxbro, Knut ;
Berg, Soren ;
Hammarskjold, Fredrik ;
Hanberger, Hakan ;
Malmvall, Bo-Erik .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2013, 52 (05) :893-901
[23]   A comparison of clinical outcomes with regular- and low-profile totally implanted central venous port systems [J].
Teichgräber U.K.-M. ;
Steitparth F. ;
Cho C.H. ;
Benter T. ;
Gebauer B. .
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2009, 32 (5) :975-979
[24]   Tunneled infusion catheters: Increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after subclavian versus internal jugular venous access [J].
Trerotola, SO ;
Kuhn-Fulton, J ;
Johnson, MS ;
Shah, H ;
Ambrosius, WT ;
Kneebone, PH .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (01) :89-93
[25]   Venous Access Ports: Indications, Implantation Technique, Follow-Up, and Complications [J].
Walser, Eric M. .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (04) :751-764
[26]  
Whitman ED, 1996, CURR PROB SURG, V33, P313
[27]   A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on choice of central venous access device for delivery of chemotherapy [J].
Yeow, Marcus ;
Soh, Shauna ;
Yap, Ryan ;
Tay, Desiree ;
Low, Yi Fen ;
Goh, Serene Si Ning ;
Yeo, Charleen Shanwen ;
Lo, Zhiwen Joseph .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2022, 10 (05) :1184-+
[28]  
Yeste Sanchez Luis, 2006, Clin Transl Oncol, V8, P735
[29]  
Yildizeli B, 2004, J Vasc Access, V5, P174
[30]   Subcutaneous chest ports via the internal jugular vein - A retrospective study of 117 oncology patients [J].
Yip, D ;
Funaki, B .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2002, 43 (04) :371-375