Corporate Social Responsibility Theories in the Context of Global Transformational Events: A Scoping Review

被引:0
作者
Billedeau, David Benjamin [1 ]
Palaschuk, Nicholas [2 ]
Wilson, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[2] Resonance Alliance Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY | 2025年
关键词
corporate social responsibility; crisis management; environmental sustainability; organizational behavior; sustainability management; theory development; SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTIONS; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; ECOLOGICAL MODERNIZATION; SHAREHOLDER VALUE; AGENCY THEORY; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR; NEOCLASSICAL THEORY; GRAND CHALLENGES; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/beer.12792
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This scoping review examines the applicability and evolution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) theories, which focus on voluntary corporate actions, during global transformational events. Additionally, the study explores the relevance of broader sustainability management (SUSM) theories, which provide comprehensive frameworks for integrating sustainability into corporate strategies, to assess their adaptability under such abnormal operating conditions. We identify and review 10 key theories pertinent to SUSM during normal and abnormal operating periods: Agency Theory, Cognitive Theory, Ecological Modernization, Institutional Theory, Leadership Theory, Legitimacy Theory, Neoclassical Theory, Shareholder Theory, Socio-Ecological Systems Theory, and Stakeholder Theory. Our findings reveal that these theories are dynamic, evolving in response to global crises, thereby influencing and being influenced by corporate behaviors. This study contributes to the academic literature by highlighting the interplay between theoretical evolution and real-world applications of CSR and SUSM. For managers, the study offers insights into building corporate resilience and adaptability, while policymakers are provided with guidance on fostering regulatory environments that support sustainable corporate practices during periods of disruption. These contributions underscore the importance of refining SUSM frameworks to guide corporate decision-making in increasingly volatile environments.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 178 条
  • [51] Fast T.W., Varieties of Capitalism: A Critique, Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 71, 1, pp. 133-155, (2016)
  • [52] Fatima T., Elbanna S., Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Implementation: A Review and a Research Agenda Towards an Integrative Framework, Journal of Business Ethics, 183, 1, pp. 105-121, (2022)
  • [53] Felicia S., Ioana S., Leadership and Crisis Management During Crisis Situations, Universitatii Maritime Constanta. Analele, 13, 17, pp. 303-306, (2012)
  • [54] Ferraro F., Etzion D., Gehman J., Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically: Robust Action Revisited, Organization Studies, 36, 3, pp. 363-390, (2015)
  • [55] Filatotchev I., Nakajima C., Corporate Governance, Responsible Managerial Behavior, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Organizational Efficiency Versus Organizational Legitimacy?, Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 3, pp. 289-306, (2014)
  • [56] Fischer J., Gardner T.A., Bennett E.M., Et al., Advancing Sustainability Through Mainstreaming a Social–Ecological Systems Perspective, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, pp. 144-149, (2015)
  • [57] Folke C., Biggs R., Norstrom A.V., Reyers B., Rockstrom J., Social-Ecological Resilience and Biosphere-Based Sustainability Science, Ecology and Society, 21, 3, (2016)
  • [58] Fombrun C., Shanley M., What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 2, pp. 233-258, (1990)
  • [59] Forbes L.C., Jermier J.M., The New Corporate Environmentalism and the Ecology of Commerce, Organization & Environment, 23, 4, pp. 465-481, (2010)
  • [60] Freeman R.E., Harrison J.S., Wicks A.C., Parmar B., de Colle S., Stakeholder Theory, The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory, (2010)