Corporate Social Responsibility Theories in the Context of Global Transformational Events: A Scoping Review

被引:0
作者
Billedeau, David Benjamin [1 ]
Palaschuk, Nicholas [2 ]
Wilson, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[2] Resonance Alliance Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY | 2025年
关键词
corporate social responsibility; crisis management; environmental sustainability; organizational behavior; sustainability management; theory development; SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTIONS; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; ECOLOGICAL MODERNIZATION; SHAREHOLDER VALUE; AGENCY THEORY; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR; NEOCLASSICAL THEORY; GRAND CHALLENGES; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/beer.12792
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This scoping review examines the applicability and evolution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) theories, which focus on voluntary corporate actions, during global transformational events. Additionally, the study explores the relevance of broader sustainability management (SUSM) theories, which provide comprehensive frameworks for integrating sustainability into corporate strategies, to assess their adaptability under such abnormal operating conditions. We identify and review 10 key theories pertinent to SUSM during normal and abnormal operating periods: Agency Theory, Cognitive Theory, Ecological Modernization, Institutional Theory, Leadership Theory, Legitimacy Theory, Neoclassical Theory, Shareholder Theory, Socio-Ecological Systems Theory, and Stakeholder Theory. Our findings reveal that these theories are dynamic, evolving in response to global crises, thereby influencing and being influenced by corporate behaviors. This study contributes to the academic literature by highlighting the interplay between theoretical evolution and real-world applications of CSR and SUSM. For managers, the study offers insights into building corporate resilience and adaptability, while policymakers are provided with guidance on fostering regulatory environments that support sustainable corporate practices during periods of disruption. These contributions underscore the importance of refining SUSM frameworks to guide corporate decision-making in increasingly volatile environments.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 178 条
  • [1] Adler N., Gellman A., Strategies for Managing Risk in a Changing Aviation Environment, Journal of Air Transport Management, 21, pp. 24-35, (2012)
  • [2] Get Smarter with EdX, (2022)
  • [3] Albuquerque R., Koskinen Y., Yang S., Zhang C., Resiliency of Environmental and Social Stocks: An Analysis of the Exogenous COVID-19 Market Crash, Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9, 3, pp. 593-621, (2020)
  • [4] Aldrich D., Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery, Choice Reviews Online, 50, 7, (2012)
  • [5] Allegretti S., Seidenstricker S., Fischer H., Arslan S., Executing a Business Model Change: Identifying Key Characteristics to Succeed in Volatile Markets, Leadership, Education, Personality: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3, pp. 21-33, (2021)
  • [6] Alpaslan C.M., Green S.E., Mitroff I.I., Corporate Governance in the Context of Crises: Towards a Stakeholder Theory of Crisis Management, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17, 1, pp. 38-49, (2009)
  • [7] Amenta E., Ramsey K.M., Institutional Theory, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, pp. 15-39, (2010)
  • [8] Andersen M.S., Massa I., Ecological Modernization—Origins, Dilemmas and Future Directions, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2, 4, pp. 337-345, (2000)
  • [9] Andres M., Agudelo L., Johannsdottir L., Davidsdottir B., A Literature Review of the History and Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4, 1, pp. 1-23, (2019)
  • [10] Anidjar L.Y., The Debate Surrounding the Company Purpose in the Post-Pandemic Age, SSRN Electronic Journal, (2022)