Term Limits in France and the United States: A Comparative History of Policy Debate and Adoption

被引:0
作者
Fevrat, Noemi [1 ]
Kousser, Thad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Avignon, Avignon, France
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
关键词
term limits; legislatures; French politics; American states; democratic reform;
D O I
10.1017/S0898030624000101
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
This article seeks to compare the policy histories of the legislative term limits in France and the United States. Both nations debated, initially adopted, and then ultimately rejected imposing term limits during the foundational moments of their democracies. Reemerging in the 1990s in America, proposals to refresh government through such limits have been successful in the states and have failed at the national level. The idea regained prominence in France when Emmanuel Macron supported it during his 2017 presidential election. Although Macron eventually abandoned the proposal, the revival of this debate is an opportunity to draw broad parallels but identify critical differences between the two nations in the philosophical debates over term limits and the ways that leaders have embraced or abandoned them to fulfill their political goals. We show how the idea circulated between the two nations, without a parallel exchange of evidence about its effects.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 21
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, Office of the President of the French Republic
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, NOUV ASS NAT 1 C REF
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, The Term Limited States
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1919, Journal Officiel, P2740
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2024, THIS FIGURE CALCULAT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, Organic law n2014-125
  • [7] [Anonymous], Term Limits and the Dismantling
  • [8] [Anonymous], 38 The co-deployment of multiple critical terms with variegated genealogies in this paragraph builds upon the theoretical apparatus that underlies and motivates this dissertation. My use of "hail" is rooted primarily in Louis Althusser's formulation of "interpellation" as the moment one recognizes oneself as a product of ideology in On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (London
  • [9] New York: Verso, 2014), 190-196. However, unlike Althusser, who framed power as a negative operation performed upon the subject by agents of "ISAs," rather than both a negative and positive operation that produced new sorts of subjects, my usage of "hail" is also more simply meant to denote an act of recognition by an actor in a particular mode of address or object (such as a diagram). Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe name the act of intentionally calling out to others in the mode that ONC doe
  • [10] New York: Verso, 2001). When one recognizes themselves in a specific mode of address they are hailed - and acts of hailing impart ideologies, create subjects, bring out new constituencies, create new publics, form new polities, enact new stakeholders, and assist in materializing new realities. This is as true in health IT policy as in any other field of activity. This approach is also informed by Michael Warner's work, particularly in the opening pages of Publics and Counterpublics, where he wr