共 98 条
Are we missing out in evaluating ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction measures? A review and way forward considering cascading benefits
被引:0
作者:
Janzen, S.
[1
,2
]
Balzer, J.
[2
]
Walz, Y.
[2
]
Sebesvari, Z.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm Univ Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 174, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
[2] United Nations Univ, Inst Environm & Human Secur UNU EHS, UN Campus,Pl Vereinten Nationen 1, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
关键词:
Evaluation;
Monitoring;
Risk reduction benefits;
Ecosystem services;
Landscape connections;
CO-BENEFITS;
GREEN ROOFS;
SERVICES;
INFRASTRUCTURE;
RESTORATION;
MITIGATION;
PAYMENTS;
ADAPTATION;
FRAMEWORK;
DESIGN;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113203
中图分类号:
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号:
090705 ;
摘要:
Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR) are nature-based solutions increasingly taken up to contribute to reducing disaster risks. The implementation of Eco-DRR improves an ecosystem and its ecosystem services provision so as to reduce all or select components of disaster risk. Since ecosystems are interconnected, the benefits of an Eco-DRR measure may go well beyond the actual implementation site. Yet, Eco-DRR is generally evaluated at the level of the measure itself, missing out to capture the full range of risk-reducing ecosystem services and benefits, which may cascade across the landscape. This paper coins the term "cascading benefits" emerging from Eco-DRR and conceptualises the holistic evaluation of Eco-DRR considering cascading benefits to advance evaluation of Eco-DRR at the landscape level. First, the paper presents the results of a literature review designed to understand how Eco-DRR is evaluated to date and whether and how their cascading benefits are considered in the evaluation. The review identified 51 relevant papers, that allowed extracting 93 Eco-DRR evaluation criteria; none of which capture cascading benefits of Eco-DRR. Next, these 93 criteria were assessed for their potential applicability to evaluate cascading benefits, based on an additional, targeted literature review and 7 expert interviews. As a result, 23 criteria were identified for evaluating cascading benefits, providing an entry point for more holistic Eco-DRR evaluation in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文