Educational gap between partners and sterilization

被引:0
作者
Choi, Kate H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Sociol, Social Sci Ctr 5331, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
关键词
cohabitation; marriage; mate selection; reproductive health; UNITED-STATES; CONTRACEPTIVE STERILIZATION; ETHNIC-DIFFERENCES; FERTILITY-CONTROL; COHABITATION; ATTITUDES; FEMALE; TRENDS; REGRET; RACE;
D O I
10.1111/jomf.13091
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective: This study compares the sterilization behavior of couples with varying joint education levels and union types. Background: A couple's joint education levels affect the resources available to them and the power dynamics within the relationship; they also help determine which spouse takes primary responsibility for the couple's fertility work. However, few studies have examined how couples' sterilization behavior differs according to their joint education levels and union type. Methods: Using data from the 2006-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, this study estimated multinomial logistic regression models to predict the relative risk of relying on female sterilization, male sterilization, or reversible contraception for couples with varying joint education levels and union type. Results: Married and cohabiting couples with higher joint levels of education were less likely than their lesser-educated counterparts to rely on female sterilization. Married couples with higher joint levels of education were more likely than their lesser-educated counterparts to rely on male sterilization. However, for cohabiting couples, disparities in reliance on male sterilization differed little according to their joint levels of education. Conclusion: Future studies should consider how male and female partners' education interact to affect their sterilization behavior. When they do, they should consider their relative and absolute levels of education.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [51] Freezing time? The sociology of egg freezing
    Myers, Kit C.
    Martin, Lauren Jade
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY COMPASS, 2021, 15 (04):
  • [52] Palmer Sophia N, 2009, Rev Obstet Gynecol, V2, P84
  • [53] Trends and determinants of reproductive health service use among young women in the USA
    Potter, J.
    Trussell, J.
    Moreau, C.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2009, 24 (12) : 3010 - 3018
  • [54] Racial Pairings and Fertility: Do Interracial Couples Have Fewer Children?
    Qian, Zhenchao
    Lichter, Daniel T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2021, 83 (04) : 961 - 984
  • [55] Do Racial and Ethnic Differences in Contraceptive Attitudes and Knowledge Explain Disparities In Method Use?
    Rocca, Corinne H.
    Harper, Cynthia C.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2012, 44 (03) : 150 - 158
  • [56] Cohabitation and Marriage: Complexity and Diversity in Union-Formation Patterns
    Sassler, Sharon
    Lichter, Daniel T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2020, 82 (01) : 35 - 61
  • [57] The Reversal of the Gender Gap in Education and Trends in Marital Dissolution
    Schwartz, Christine R.
    Han, Hongyun
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2014, 79 (04) : 605 - 629
  • [58] Trends and Variation in Assortative Mating: Causes and Consequences
    Schwartz, Christine R.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, VOL 39, 2013, 39 : 451 - 470
  • [59] Vasectomy: the other (better) form of sterilization
    Shih, Grace
    Turok, David K.
    Parker, Willie J.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 83 (04) : 310 - 315
  • [60] Surgical sterilization, regret, and race: Contemporary patterns
    Shreffler, Karina M.
    McQuillan, Julia
    Greil, Arthur L.
    Johnson, David R.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2015, 50 : 31 - 45