Educational gap between partners and sterilization

被引:0
作者
Choi, Kate H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Sociol, Social Sci Ctr 5331, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
关键词
cohabitation; marriage; mate selection; reproductive health; UNITED-STATES; CONTRACEPTIVE STERILIZATION; ETHNIC-DIFFERENCES; FERTILITY-CONTROL; COHABITATION; ATTITUDES; FEMALE; TRENDS; REGRET; RACE;
D O I
10.1111/jomf.13091
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective: This study compares the sterilization behavior of couples with varying joint education levels and union types. Background: A couple's joint education levels affect the resources available to them and the power dynamics within the relationship; they also help determine which spouse takes primary responsibility for the couple's fertility work. However, few studies have examined how couples' sterilization behavior differs according to their joint education levels and union type. Methods: Using data from the 2006-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, this study estimated multinomial logistic regression models to predict the relative risk of relying on female sterilization, male sterilization, or reversible contraception for couples with varying joint education levels and union type. Results: Married and cohabiting couples with higher joint levels of education were less likely than their lesser-educated counterparts to rely on female sterilization. Married couples with higher joint levels of education were more likely than their lesser-educated counterparts to rely on male sterilization. However, for cohabiting couples, disparities in reliance on male sterilization differed little according to their joint levels of education. Conclusion: Future studies should consider how male and female partners' education interact to affect their sterilization behavior. When they do, they should consider their relative and absolute levels of education.
引用
收藏
页码:1727 / 1746
页数:20
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Contraceptive sterilization use among married men in the United States: results from the male sample of the National Survey of Family Growth [J].
Anderson, John E. ;
Warner, Lee ;
Jamieson, Denise J. ;
Kissin, Dmitry M. ;
Nangia, Ajay K. ;
Macaluso, Maurizio .
CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (03) :230-235
[2]   Cohabitation and Contraceptive Use in the United States: A Focus on Race and Ethnicity [J].
Anyawie, Maurice ;
Manning, Wendy .
POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW, 2019, 38 (03) :307-325
[3]   Separate and unequal: The effect of unequal access to employment-based health insurance on same-sex and unmarried different-sex couples [J].
Ash, Michael A. ;
Badgett, M. V. Lee .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2006, 24 (04) :582-599
[4]  
Bawah A. A., 2013, African Population Studies, V27, P216, DOI 10.11564/27-2-442
[5]  
Bernard J., 1982, FUTURE MARRIAGE, V2nd
[6]   Gendered Divisions of Fertility Work: Socioeconomic Predictors of Female Versus Male Sterilization [J].
Bertotti, Andrea M. .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2013, 75 (01) :13-25
[7]  
Blood R., 1960, HUSBANDS WIVES
[8]   Potential unintended pregnancies averted and cost savings associated with a revised Medicaid sterilization policy [J].
Borrero, Sonya ;
Zite, Nikki ;
Potter, Joseph E. ;
Trussell, James ;
Smith, Kenneth .
CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 88 (06) :691-696
[9]   ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY, GENDER, AND THE DIVISION-OF-LABOR AT HOME [J].
BRINES, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1994, 100 (03) :652-688
[10]   Women, men, and contraceptive sterilization [J].
Bumpass, LL ;
Thomson, E ;
Godecker, AL .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (05) :937-946