A comparison of development methods used to define portion sizes in food-based dietary guidelines around the world

被引:0
作者
Salesse, Fanny [1 ,2 ]
Eldridge, Alison L. [3 ]
Mak, Tsz Ning [4 ]
Gibney, Eileen R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Inst Food & Hlth, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Insight Ctr Data Analyt, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Nestle Inst Hlth Sci, Nestle Res, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Nestle Inst Hlth Sci Singapore Hub, Nestle Res, Singapore, Singapore
来源
FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION | 2025年 / 12卷
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
food-based dietary guidelines; portion size; dietary recommendations; linear programming; diet modeling; dietary intake; NUTRITION; CONSUMPTION; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fnut.2025.1532926
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Introduction Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) are essential public health tools for delivering dietary recommendations, and generally include guidance on portion sizes. Despite existing guidelines on developing and implementing FBDGs, there is still no consensus on best practices for their formulation. This paper compares the methodologies used by public health organizations to create FBDGs and examines how both methodology and geographical location may influence recommended portion sizes.Methods Documents on FBDG development were obtained from the Food and Agriculture Organization online repository of FBDGs, either directly from consumer-facing FBDG or from corresponding scientific reports. Methodological details in FBDG development were extracted and categorized. Recommended portions in grams per day were extracted for 15 food categories to enable comparison across development methods and global regions.Results FBDGs from 96 countries were accessed and translated. Of these, n = 83 were based on consensus/review, n = 15 used data-based approaches, and n = 30 included other minor calculations. Thirty-nine FBDGs were derived from a combination of consensus/review and another method. Of the countries providing portion size information, only one did not report its methodological approach. Comparisons of median portions sizes of food groups across methodologies showed no significant differences. Analyses across regions revealed that portion recommendations were generally consistent, with significant differences found only for one food group, namely, Fish & shellfish, where portion size recommendations were significantly higher in Europe compared to those in Latin America and the Caribbean.Discussion Results indicate little variation in the recommendations for portion size across development methods, and for most food groups, across global regions. These findings suggest there is potential to harmonize portion size derivation in FBDGs at regional or global levels. However, further research is needed to assess whether harmonized guidance can apply to other aspects of FBDGs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] Noncommunicable Diseases, (2022)
  • [2] Afshin A., John Sur P., Fay K., Cornaby L., Ferrara G., Salama J., Et al., Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of disease study 2017, Lancet, 393, pp. 1958-1972, (2019)
  • [3] World Health Organization & Joint FAO/WHO Consultation on preparation and Use of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines, (1995)
  • [4] Scientific Recommendations for Healthy Eating Guidelines in Ireland, (2011)
  • [5] Food-Based Dietary Guidelines
  • [6] Wansink B., Wansink A., MyPlate, half-plate, and no plate: How visual plate-related dietary benchmarks influence meal composition, medRxiv [Preprint], (2021)
  • [7] Scientific Opinion on Establishing Food-Based Dietary Guidelines, (2010)
  • [8] Fanzo J., Bellows A., Spiker M., Thorne-Lyman A., Bloem M., The importance of food systems and the environment for nutrition, Am J Clin Nutr, 113, 1, pp. 7-16.1, (2021)
  • [9] Turkie R., A human rights-based, regime interaction approach to climate change and malnutrition: Reforming food systems for human and planetary health, Netherlands Quar. Hum Rights, 40, 4, pp. 399-421, (2022)
  • [10] Bechthold A., Boeing H., Tetens I., Schwingshackl L., Nothlings U., Perspective: Food-based dietary guidelines in europe—scientific concepts, current status, and perspectives, Adv. Nutr, 9, 5, pp. 544-560, (2018)