Pre-implementation of electronic patient-reported outcomes at reference centers for head and neck oncology. A roadmap towards patient-centered digitalization

被引:0
作者
Dejaco, Daniel [1 ]
Gottfried, Timo [1 ]
Santer, Matthias [1 ]
Thurner, Anna [2 ]
Lehmann, Jens [2 ]
Riedl, David [2 ]
Rumpold, Gerhard [2 ,3 ]
Holzner, Bernhard [2 ,3 ]
Schmutzhard, Joachim [1 ]
Hofauer, Benedikt [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Univ Klin Hals Nasen & Ohrenheilkunde Kopf & Halsc, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapie Psychosomat & Med Psy, Univ Klin Psychiat Innsbruck 2, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Evaluat Software Dev, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Quality of life; Surveys and questionnaires; Computer-assisted signal processing; Electronic data processing; Database management systems; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00106-024-01543-7
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Electronically captured patient reports (electronic patient-reported outcomes, ePROs) are digital questionnaires filled out by cancer patients. Despite indications of improved clinical care, the integration of ePROs into clinical head and neck oncology is uncharted territory. Objective: This work outlines the implementation process for ePROs at the University Hospital for Otorhinolaryngology at the Medical University of Innsbruck (ENT Innsbruck). Methods: The implementation is carried out by a project team in a pre-implementation phase (needs assessment, implementation planning, identification of intra-hospital barriers, prototype development, testing and adaptation, and user training), an implementation phase (implementation and user training), and a post-implementation phase (quality control and project expansion). Results: The project team at ENT Innsbruck, consisting of 10 members, identified the need for digitalization in cancer follow-up. A hybrid implementation solution (Computer-Based Health Evaluation System, CHES; Evaluation Software Development, ESD, Innsbruck, Austria) was chosen. ePROs (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - 30 items, EORTC-QLQ-C30; Head and Neck Functional Integrity Scale, HNC-FIT scale; and EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Module, EORTC H&N43) will be collected 12 times over 5.5 years. A total of 25 users rated the prototype as user friendly (patient perspective: 8.1 +/- 1.6, 3-10; user perspective: 8.6 +/- 1.1, 6-10). The main advantage was faster medical history taking (72%), and the main disadvantages were a lack of personnel, time, and motivation (52%). Conclusion: The feedback on the ePRO prototype at ENT Innsbruck was positive. The implementation phase commenced in the first quarter of 2024. Goal achievement will be evaluated in the post-implementation phase in the fourth quarter of 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] EORTC Quality of Life Group, 2018, EORT H N43
  • [12] The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organisations delivering health related services: A systematic review of reviews
    Foster A.
    Croot L.
    Brazier J.
    Harris J.
    O’cathain A.
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2 (1)
  • [13] Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research
    Giesinger, Johannes M.
    Loth, Fanny L. C.
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Arraras, Juan I.
    Caocci, Giovanni
    Efficace, Fabio
    Groenvold, Mogens
    van Leeuwen, Marieke
    Petersen, Morten Aa.
    Ramage, John
    Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.
    Young, Teresa
    Holzner, Bernhard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 118 : 1 - 8
  • [14] Assessing quality of life on the day of chemotherapy administration underestimates patients' true symptom burden
    Giesinger, Johannes M.
    Wintner, Lisa M.
    Zabernigg, August
    Gamper, Eva-Maria
    Oberguggenberger, Anne S.
    Sztankay, Monika J.
    Kemmler, Georg
    Holzner, Bernhard
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2014, 14
  • [15] A review of the barriers to using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care
    Hanh Nguyen
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dhillon, Haryana
    Sundaresan, Puma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (02) : 186 - 195
  • [16] The Computer-based Health Evaluation Software (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Giesinger, Johannes M.
    Pinggera, Jakob
    Zugal, Stefan
    Schoepf, Felix
    Oberguggenberger, Anne S.
    Gamper, Eva M.
    Zabernigg, August
    Weber, Barbara
    Rumpold, Gerhard
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 12
  • [17] What Is the Value of the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Toward Improvement of Patient Outcomes, Processes of Care, and Health Service Outcomes in Cancer Care? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials
    Kotronoulas, Grigorios
    Kearney, Nora
    Maguire, Roma
    Harrow, Alison
    Di Domenico, David
    Croy, Suzanne
    MacGillivray, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (14) : 1480 - +
  • [18] Health care providers underestimate symptom intensities of cancer patients: A multicenter European study
    Laugsand, Eivor A.
    Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
    Bjordal, Kristin
    Skorpen, Frank
    Kaasa, Stein
    Klepstad, Pal
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2010, 8
  • [19] Additional Value of Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring in Cancer Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Lizan, Luis
    Perez-Carbonell, Lucia
    Comellas, Marta
    [J]. CANCERS, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [20] Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities
    Lohr, Kathleen N.
    Zebrack, Bradley J.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (01) : 99 - 107