Out-of-equilibrium and intangible assets

被引:0
作者
Antonelli, Cristiano [1 ]
Orsatti, Gianluca [1 ]
Pialli, Guido [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Turin, Italy
[2] UCL, London, England
关键词
Uncertainty and risk; Out of equilibrium; Creative response; Innovation; Intangible assets; Entrepreneurship; O31; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; MARKET VALUE; INNOVATION; INVESTMENT; FIRMS; GROWTH; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; COMPETITION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s00191-025-00890-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The new evidence provided by the codification of intangible assets in national accounts and firm statistics provides the opportunity to test the Schumpeterian creative response hypothesis according to which (i) the generation and exploitation of knowledge are characterized by high levels of risk, (ii) firms in equilibrium are reluctant to undertake risky activities, (iii) the farther away from equilibrium conditions, the stronger the firm's willingness to introduce innovation, (iv) the creative response effect is heterogeneous across firm size, age, and industry technological content. Empirical evidence for publicly listed companies in the US during 1977-2016 confirms a U-shaped relationship between out-of-equilibrium performance and intangible intensity growth. Moreover, we estimate a deeper U-shaped relationship between performance and growth in intangibles intensity for small and young firms and, on average, for firms in high-tech industries. Our results are robust to different econometric tests performed on alternative samples. An original instrumental variable strategy further strengthens the validity of our results. We conclude that the firm creative response is an out-of-equilibrium phenomenon, stronger in the case of disappointing performances and sharper for small, young, and high-tech firms.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 156
页数:34
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Acs ZJ, 2009, SMALL BUS ECON, V32, P15, DOI [10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3, 10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9]
[2]   A MODEL OF GROWTH THROUGH CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
AGHION, P ;
HOWITT, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (02) :323-351
[3]   Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bloom, N ;
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Howitt, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (02) :701-728
[4]   In defence of generalized Darwinism [J].
Aldrich, Howard E. ;
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. ;
Hull, David L. ;
Knudsen, Thorbjorn ;
Mokyr, Joel ;
Vanberg, Viktor J. .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2008, 18 (05) :577-596
[5]   R&D profitability: the role of risk and Knightian uncertainty [J].
Amoroso, Sara ;
Moncada-Paterno-Castello, Pietro ;
Vezzani, Antonio .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2017, 48 (02) :331-343
[6]   CAN SECOND-GENERATION ENDOGENOUS GROWTH MODELS EXPLAIN THE PRODUCTIVITY TRENDS AND KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION IN THE ASIAN MIRACLE ECONOMIES? [J].
Ang, James B. ;
Madsen, Jakob B. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2011, 93 (04) :1360-1373
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Endogenous Innovation: the economics of an emergent system property
[8]  
Antonelli C., 2023, CREATIVE RESPONSE KN
[9]  
Antonelli C., 2019, The Knowledge Growth Regime. A Schumpeterian Approach
[10]  
Antonelli C., 2018, The Engines of the Creative Response