Performance of ChatGPT in medical licensing examinations in countries worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Mingxin [1 ]
Okuhara, Tsuyoshi [2 ]
Chang, Xinyi [3 ]
Okada, Hiroko [2 ]
Kiuchi, Takahiro [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Hlth Commun, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Sch Publ Hlth, Grad Sch Med, Dept Hlth Commun, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Tokyo Inst Technol, Sch Engn, Dept Ind Engn & Econ, Tokyo, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0312771
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction In November 2022, the online artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot ChatGPT was released to the public, and swiftly garnered global attention because of its ability to provide detailed answers to complex queries. In medical field, ChatGPT has shown great potential to be used in medical education and has excelled in many English-language medical licensing examinations. However, due to the variability of medical licensing examinations in different countries, and ChatGPT's particular proficiency in English, the previous literatures showed that ChatGPT is unable to pass medical licensing examinations from non-English-speaking countries or those not administered in English. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to review whether ChatGPT can demonstrate consistent accuracy across diverse medical licensing examinations and be used in medical education across countries.Objective In this study protocol, we aimed to analyze and review the differences in performance of ChatGPT in medical exams in various language environments and countries, as well as its potential in medical education.Methods and analysis A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus to collect papers testing the performance of ChatGPT in medical licensing examinations. We imported all the collected literatures into Rayyan and screened the literatures based on the selection criteria and exclusion criteria. The risk of bias and quality of included studies was assessed by using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Data from included studies was extracted into an Excel spreadsheet. All of the above processes were completed by two reviewers independently. A third reviewer was consulted in cases of disagreement. Finally, we provided both quantitative and qualitative analysis of the findings from the included studies.Trial registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024506687.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of ChatGPT in medical examinations: A systematic review and a meta-analysis
    Levin, Gabriel
    Horesh, Nir
    Brezinov, Yoav
    Meyer, Raanan
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 (03) : 378 - 380
  • [2] Performance of ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in national licensing examinations for medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, and nursing: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jin, Hye Kyung
    Lee, Ha Eun
    Kim, Eunyoung
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [3] Large Language Models in Dental Licensing Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Mingxin
    Okuhara, Tsuyoshi
    Huang, Wenbo
    Ogihara, Atsushi
    Nagao, Hikari Sophia
    Okada, Hiroko
    Kiuchi, Takahiro
    INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2025, 75 (01) : 213 - 222
  • [4] Performance of ChatGPT Across Different Versions in MedicalLicensing Examinations Worldwide:Systematic Review andMeta-Analysis
    Liu, Mingxin
    Okuhara, Tsuyoshi
    Chang, XinYi
    Shirabe, Ritsuko
    Nishiie, Yuriko
    Okada, Hiroko
    Kiuchi, Takahiro
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [5] Evaluation of ChatGPT-generated medical responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wei, Qiuhong
    Yao, Zhengxiong
    Cui, Ying
    Wei, Bo
    Jin, Zhezhen
    Xu, Ximing
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 151
  • [6] A systematic review and meta-analysis on ChatGPT and its utilization in medical and dental research
    Bagde, Hiroj
    Dhopte, Ashwini
    Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
    Basri, Rehana
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (12)
  • [7] The predictive validity of the MCAT for medical school performance and medical board licensing examinations: A meta-analysis of the published research
    Donnon, Tyrone
    Paolucci, Elizabeth Oddone
    Violato, Claudio
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (01) : 100 - 106
  • [8] Are ADHD medications under or over prescribed worldwide? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moreira-Maia, Carlos Renato
    Massuti, Rafael
    Tessari, Luca
    Campani, Fausto
    Akutagava-Martins, Glaucia Chiyoko
    Cortese, Samuele
    Rohde, Luis Augusto
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (24)
  • [9] Medical informatics and biophysics in medical universities of European countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tsekhmister, Yaroslav
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2024, 21 (02):
  • [10] The Worldwide Prevalence of Dyspepsia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Marwaha, Avantika
    Ford, Alexander C.
    Lim, Allen
    Moayyedi, Paul
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (05) : A182 - A182