How do Green Acquirers Select Targets? Value of Green Innovation in Takeovers

被引:2
作者
Hussain, Tanveer [1 ]
Kumar, Niraj [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, 36 Queens Rd, Southend On Sea SS1 1BF, England
关键词
CROSS-BORDER MERGERS; FREE CASH FLOW; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; ADVERSE SELECTION; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; MANUFACTURING FIRMS; PRODUCT INNOVATION; SERIAL ACQUIRERS; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8551.12904
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A burgeoning literature on green mergers and acquisitions (M&As) is based on the assumption that acquirers are polluting firms and buy targets with green resources to gain sustainable development, ignoring the fact that acquirers can also have green resources. This study explores how green acquirers select their targets and realize benefits in the international takeover market. Drawing upon the resource-based view and information asymmetry perspective, we argue that green acquirers have a competitive advantage and prefer targets with lower firm-level (publicly listed target) and industry-level (targets from the related industry) information asymmetries in order to better estimate the target's value and avoid the risk of overpayment. Findings from 7788 M&As announced between 2005 and 2021 support our argument, showing that green acquirers buy targets with lower information asymmetries and earn higher returns. We also find that board characteristics and takeover experience are boundary conditions affecting the target selections of green acquirers. Our study contributes to green M&As and information economics by emphasizing the interplay of green innovation and lower information asymmetries in target selection and value creation.
引用
收藏
页码:1303 / 1325
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   How do university-industry alliances respond to the trust crisis in green technology innovation activities? [J].
Zhang, Qian ;
Yi, Huiyong .
NANKAI BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 15 (02) :269-299
[22]   How do intellectual property rights and government support drive a firm's green innovation? The mediating role of open innovation [J].
Roh, Taewoo ;
Lee, Kangmun ;
Yang, Ji Yeon .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 317
[23]   How global value chain participation affects green technology innovation processes: A moderated mediation model [J].
Hu, Dianxi ;
Jiao, Jianling ;
Tang, Yunshu ;
Xu, Yuwen ;
Zha, Jianrui .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2022, 68
[24]   Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability [J].
Yuan, Baolong ;
Cao, Xueyun .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2022, 68
[25]   Measuring and Integrating Risk Management into Green Innovation Practices for Green Manufacturing under the Global Value Chain [J].
Sun, Yingying ;
Bi, Kexin ;
Yin, Shi .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (02)
[26]   How Does Digital Transformation Influence Collaborative Green Innovation? [J].
Chen, Rongxin ;
Zhang, Beifan ;
Chen, Yuhao .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 32 (01) :1-21
[27]   How does performance feedback affect green innovation in enterprises? [J].
Chen, Min ;
Wang, Yuandi ;
Zeng, Longji .
BALTIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2025,
[28]   How does ESG performance promote corporate green innovation? [J].
Long, Han ;
Feng, Gen-Fu ;
Chang, Chun-Ping .
ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2023, 56 (04) :2889-2913
[29]   Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: How external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter? [J].
Zhang, Jianming ;
Liang, Gongqian ;
Feng, Taiwen ;
Yuan, Chunlin ;
Jiang, Wenbo .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (01) :39-53
[30]   How does artificial intelligence affect the environmental performance of organizations? The role of green innovation and green culture [J].
Lin, Jiabao ;
Zeng, Yanyun ;
Wu, Shaowu ;
Luo, Xin .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 61 (02)