Bio-oil production: A comparative analysis of catalytic pyrolysis with cobalt catalyst versus direct pyrolysis of Azolla and Ulva biomasses

被引:0
作者
Pourkarimi, S. [1 ]
Saberdelsadeh, M. [2 ]
Nouri, H. [3 ]
Hallajisani, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Caspian Fac Engn, Biofuel Lab, POB 111454653, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[3] Iowa State Univ, Chem & Biol Engn Dept, Ames, IA USA
关键词
Azolla biomass; Bio-oil; Catalytic pyrolysis; Cobalt Catalyst; HHV; Ulva biomass; TEMPERATURE; MICROALGAE; PROLIFERA;
D O I
10.56042/ijct.v31i6.11340
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Bio-oil is a key alternative to fossil fuels, and its commercialization requires assessing production quality and quantity. Catalysts play a crucial role in the bio-oil production process. This study evaluates the impact of cobalt-based zeolite (Co/HZSM-5) catalysts on the pyrolysis of Azolla and Ulva biomasses, focusing on bio-oil production and comparing it with direct pyrolysis. It demonstrated that catalytic pyrolysis improved the high heat value (HHV) and energy yield of the bio-oil compared with direct pyrolysis.Specifically, for Azolla, the bio-oil yield decreased from 30.64% in direct pyrolysis to 23.5% with the catalyst, while HHV increased from 28.6 MJ/kg to 33.2 MJ/kg. For Ulva, bio-oil yield fell from 34.43% to 26.1%, with HHV rising from 30.7 MJ/kg to 32.26 MJ/kg. Catalytic pyrolysis also enhanced energy recovery, achieving 48.37% for Azolla and 69.02% for Ulva. The process altered the distribution of pyrolysis products: biogas yield dropped from 37% to 27.14% for Azolla and from 30.5% to 16.57% for Ulva, while biochar yield increased from 39.5% to 42.21% for Azolla and from 43.4% to 49% for Ulva. These results suggest that catalytic pyrolysis is effective in producing higher quality bio-oil and improves overall energy efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 888
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [31] An experimental study of oil recovery from sewage sludge by low-temperature pyrolysis in a fluidised-bed
    Shen, L
    Zhang, DK
    [J]. FUEL, 2003, 82 (04) : 465 - 472
  • [32] Thermal cracking of Enteromorpha prolifera with solvents to bio-oil
    Song, Linhua
    Hu, Mingming
    Liu, Dong
    Zhang, Daoxiang
    Jiang, Cuiyu
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 77 : 7 - 12
  • [33] A state-of-the-art review on algae pyrolysis for bioenergy and biochar production
    Sun, Jiacheng
    Norouzi, Omid
    Masek, Ondrej
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 346
  • [34] Effects of feedstock type, production method, and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties
    Sun, Yining
    Gao, Bin
    Yao, Ying
    Fang, June
    Zhang, Ming
    Zhou, Yanmei
    Chen, Hao
    Yang, Liuyan
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 240 : 574 - 578
  • [35] Bio-oil and biochar from the pyrolytic conversion of biomass: A current and future perspective on the trade-off between economic, environmental, and technical indicators
    Vuppaladadiyam, Arun Krishna
    Vuppaladadiyam, Sai Sree Varsha
    Sahoo, Abhisek
    Murugavelh, S.
    Anthony, Edward
    Bhaskar, Thallada
    Zheng, Ying
    Zhao, Ming
    Duan, Huabo
    Zhao, Yan
    Antunes, Elsa
    Sarmah, Ajit K.
    Leu, Shao-Yuan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 857
  • [36] Synergistic effects of catalytic co-pyrolysis Chlorella vulgaris and polyethylene mixtures using artificial neuron network: Thermodynamic and empirical kinetic analyses
    Yap, Tshun Li
    Loy, Adrian Chun Minh
    Chin, Bridgid Lai Fui
    Lim, Juin Yau
    Alhamzi, Hatem
    Chai, Yee Ho
    Yiin, Chung Loong
    Cheah, Kin Wai
    Wee, Melvin Xin Jie
    Lam, Man Kee
    Jawad, Zeinab Abbas
    Yusup, Suzana
    Lock, Serene Sow Mun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (03):