Performance analysis of optimized machine learning models for hydrogen leakage and dispersion prediction via genetic algorithms

被引:1
作者
Lee, Junseo [1 ]
Oh, Sehyeon [2 ]
Ma, Byungchol [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Ctr Proc Innovat Simulat, 77 Yongbong Ro, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Chem Engn, 77 Yongbong Ro, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
关键词
Hydrogen dispersion; Machine learning; Genetic algorithm; Hyperparameter; Deep neural network; VALIDATION; SAFETY; VAPOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.183
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Hydrogen, a leading alternative to petroleum fuels, poses significant risks, necessitating accurate leakage and dispersion predictions. Numerous Machine Learning (ML) models have been developed to address this challenge; however, these models often exhibit two major limitations: they are generally tailored to specific leakage scenarios and their hyperparameters are selected empirically. This research aims to evaluate various ML models optimized with Genetic Algorithms (GA) for predicting hydrogen dispersion in typical leakage scenarios. Using a dataset of 6561 scenarios generated by PHAST, considering both source and dispersion properties, the study finetuned each model's hyperparameters with GA. k-fold cross validation was used to verify the optimized ML models' reproducibility, while statistical metrics such as R2 assessed the models' performance. Ultimately, the GA-DNN model is determined to be the best appropriate for hydrogen dispersion prediction. This methodology offers a comprehensive framework for developing hydrogen dispersion prediction models, encompassing data selection, model design, and execution.
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1301
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Review of hydrogen safety during storage, transmission, and applications processes
    Abohamzeh, Elham
    Salehi, Fatemeh
    Sheikholeslami, Mohsen
    Abbassi, Rouzbeh
    Khan, Faisal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2021, 72
  • [2] A comprehensive survey on optimizing deep learning models by metaheuristics
    Akay, Bahriye
    Karaboga, Dervis
    Akay, Rustu
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2022, 55 (02) : 829 - 894
  • [3] Application of machine learning methods for process safety assessments
    Bengherbia, Tarek
    Syed, Faisal A.
    Chew, Jenny
    Khalid, Fathullah A.
    Goh, Alex F. T.
    Chraibi, Kenza
    Abdeen, Mohammed Zainal
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2024, 43 (S1) : S98 - S107
  • [4] Hydrogen leakage location prediction at hydrogen refueling stations based on deep learning
    Bi, Yubo
    Wu, Qiulan
    Wang, Shilu
    Shi, Jihao
    Cong, Haiyong
    Ye, Lili
    Gao, Wei
    Bi, Mingshu
    [J]. ENERGY, 2023, 284
  • [5] Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics
    Brunton, Steven L.
    Noack, Bernd R.
    Koumoutsakos, Petros
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 52, 2020, 52 : 477 - 508
  • [6] CCPS(Center for Chemical Process Safety), 1999, Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis, Vsecond
  • [7] Peripheric sensors-based leaking source tracking in a chemical industrial park with complex obstacles
    Chen, Shikuan
    Du, Wenli
    Peng, Xin
    Cao, Chenxi
    Wang, Xinjie
    Wang, Bing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2022, 78
  • [8] Chen TQ, 2016, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1603.02754
  • [9] Crowl D.A., 2001, CHEM PROCESS SAFETY
  • [10] An approach to solve the facility layout problem based on the worst-case scenario
    Diaz-Ovalle, Christian
    Vazquez-Roman, Richart
    Mannan, M. Sam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2010, 23 (03) : 385 - 392