Impact of re-operation on progression-free survival in patients with recurrent GBM: Experience in a tertiary referral center

被引:0
作者
Darwish, Houssein [1 ]
Diab, Tasnim [2 ]
Kawtharani, Sarah [1 ]
Barake, Mounir [2 ]
Ali, Bader [1 ]
Ramadan, Nagham [2 ]
Fadlallah, Hiba [3 ]
Kekedjian, Jeannot [2 ]
Najjar, Marwan [1 ]
Assi, Hazem I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Naef K Bassile Canc Inst, Dept Internal Med, Div Hematol & Oncol,Med Ctr, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Med, Beirut, Lebanon
来源
PLOS ONE | 2025年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA; GLIOBLASTOMA-MULTIFORME; REPEATED SURGERY; TEMOZOLOMIDE; ADJUVANT; RESECTION; CRITERIA; THERAPY; BENEFIT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0317937
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Reoperation for patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly debated topic within the medical community. GBM is known for its aggressive nature and poor prognosis, with most patients experiencing tumor recurrence despite initial treatments. Some studies suggest a survival benefit from a second surgery, while others do not. The aim of this study is to assess whether reoperation for recurrent GBM offers a survival benefit compared to patients who do not undergo re-resection and to identify the prognostic factors influencing patient selection for reoperation. Methods This study retrospectively reviewed medical records from the American University of Beirut Medical Center over a ten-year period, from 01/01/2012 to 01/01/2023. It included patients with recurrent GBM after initial surgical resection. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who underwent reoperation and those who received only medical management upon recurrence. Inclusion criteria included histologically confirmed GBM with previous tumor resection; patients who only had a biopsy were excluded. Time to progression and time to death were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve, with differences between groups assessed by the log-rank test. Results Age categorization (<= 50 vs. >50 years) and gender distribution did not significantly impact reoperation likelihood (p = 0.306 and p = 0.616, respectively). However, a notable association was observed with Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) <= 3, indicating higher reoperation rates (p = 0.022). Tumor size grouping (<= 5 vs. >5 cm) showed no significant association with reoperation status (p = 0.175). Similarly, whether the tumor was unifocal or multifocal and the extent of initial tumor resection (GTR vs. subtotal) did not demonstrate significant associations with reoperation (p = 0.086 and p = 0.351, respectively). Remarkably, complications following the initial surgery emerged as a significant factor associated with the decision not to undergo reoperation (p = 0.018). The most common complications following both initial and subsequent surgeries included DVT, weakness, seizures, and wound leakage and infection. The progression-free survival for patients who underwent reoperation was 15.9 months, whereas for those who did not undergo reoperation, it was 6.7 months (log-rank p < 0.001) The median post progression survival for patients who underwent reoperation upon recurrence was 5.9 months, compared to 5.1 months for those who did not undergo reoperation. (log-rank p = 0.065). The median overall survival for patients who did not undergo reoperation was 11 months, compared to 21 months for those who underwent reoperation (log-rank p < 0.001). Conclusion In conclusion, reoperation for recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) appears to offer a survival benefit, as indicated by significantly longer disease-free intervals and higher progression-free and overall survival rates compared to patients who did not undergo reoperation.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Benefit of tumor resection for recurrent glioblastoma
    Quick, Johanna
    Gessler, Florian
    Duetzmann, Stephan
    Hattingen, Elke
    Harter, Patrick N.
    Weise, Lutz M.
    Franz, Kea
    Seifert, Volker
    Senft, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 117 (02) : 365 - 372
  • [22] FAVORABLE PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA WITH RADIATION NECROSIS: THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO REOPERATION SERIES
    Rusthoven, Kyle E.
    Olsen, Christine
    Franklin, Wilbur
    Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B. K.
    Kavanagh, Brian D.
    Gaspar, Laurie E.
    Lillehei, Kevin
    Waziri, Allen
    Damek, Denise M.
    Chen, Changhu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (01): : 211 - 217
  • [23] Alternating Electric Fields for the Treatment of Glioblastoma
    Sampson, John H.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (23): : 2511 - 2513
  • [24] Glioblastoma - the consequences of advanced patient age on treatment and survival
    Stark, Andreas M.
    Hedderich, Juergen
    Held-Feindt, Janka
    Mehdorn, H. Maximilian
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 30 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [25] Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma
    Stupp, R
    Mason, WP
    van den Bent, MJ
    Weller, M
    Fisher, B
    Taphoorn, MJB
    Belanger, K
    Brandes, AA
    Marosi, C
    Bogdahn, U
    Curschmann, J
    Janzer, RC
    Ludwin, SK
    Gorlia, T
    Allgeier, A
    Lacombe, D
    Cairncross, JG
    Eisenhauer, E
    Mirimanoff, RO
    Van Den Weyngaert, D
    Kaendler, S
    Krauseneck, P
    Vinolas, N
    Villa, S
    Wurm, RE
    Maillot, MHB
    Spagnolli, F
    Kantor, G
    Malhaire, JP
    Renard, L
    De Witte, O
    Scandolaro, L
    Vecht, CJ
    Maingon, P
    Lutterbach, J
    Kobierska, A
    Bolla, M
    Souchon, R
    Mitine, C
    Tzuk-Shina, T
    Kuten, A
    Haferkamp, G
    de Greve, J
    Priou, F
    Menten, J
    Rutten, I
    Clavere, P
    Malmstrom, A
    Jancar, B
    Newlands, E
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (10) : 987 - 996
  • [26] Impact of combination therapy with repeat surgery and temozolomide for recurrent or progressive glioblastoma multiforme: a prospective trial
    Terasaki, Mizuhiko
    Ogo, Etsuyo
    Fukushima, Shintaro
    Sakata, Kiyohiko
    Miyagi, Naohisa
    Abe, Toshi
    Shigemori, Minoru
    [J]. SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (03): : 250 - 254
  • [27] Reoperation for Recurrent Glioblastoma and Its Association With Survival Benefit
    Tully, Patrick A.
    Gogos, Andrew J.
    Love, Craig
    Liew, Danny
    Drummond, Katharine J.
    Morokoff, Andrew P.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 79 (05) : 678 - 689
  • [28] Surgery for Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Retrospective Case Control Study
    Voisin, Mathew R.
    Zuccato, Jeffrey A.
    Wang, Justin Z.
    Zadeh, Gelareh
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 166 : E624 - E631
  • [29] Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    Macdonald, David R.
    Reardon, David A.
    Cloughesy, Timothy F.
    Sorensen, A. Gregory
    Galanis, Evanthia
    DeGroot, John
    Wick, Wolfgang
    Gilbert, Mark R.
    Lassman, Andrew B.
    Tsien, Christina
    Mikkelsen, Tom
    Wong, Eric T.
    Chamberlain, Marc C.
    Stupp, Roger
    Lamborn, Kathleen R.
    Vogelbaum, Michael A.
    van den Bent, Martin J.
    Chang, Susan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (11) : 1963 - 1972
  • [30] Efficacy of Surgery and Further Treatment of Progressive Glioblastoma
    Woernle, Christoph Michael
    Peus, Dominik
    Hofer, Silvia
    Rushing, Elisabeth Jane
    Held, Ulrike
    Bozinov, Oliver
    Krayenbuehl, Niklaus
    Weller, Michael
    Regli, Luca
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (02) : 301 - 307