Critical Mixed Methods: The Imperative for Critical Inquiry and Reflexivity in Research

被引:3
作者
Hernandez-Johnson, Monica J. [1 ]
Bendixen, Lisa D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada Vegas, Dept Educ Psychol Leadership & Higher Educ, 4505 S Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
关键词
critical mixed methods; criticality; critical inquiry;
D O I
10.1177/15586898241302955
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Mixed methods research (MMR) combines qualitative and quantitative approaches, enabling researchers to achieve a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of social phenomena. This integration is crucial because it allows for a richer exploration of complex issues and has evolved to incorporate social justice work. However, there are also concerns that the use of MMR is merely a token of recognition when working with "emic perspectives" as places of higher education favor post-positivist assumptions rooted in neoliberal agendas limited by impact measures constraining qualitative methods to the margins of academia. In light of these considerations, this work seeks to offer a practical guide to critical inquiry within the context of MMR. Critical mixed methods research (CMMR) deviates from the traditional MMR research process by using critical inquiry and self-reflection in every step, informed by critical theories, lenses, and constructs. Additionally, it offers practical recommendations to equip and support researchers to conduct rigorous, ethically informed, and transformative research, especially when working with underrepresented groups who face systemic barriers to opportunities, resources, and representation. Depending on the economic, socio-political, or geographic context, these groups can include racial/ethnic minorities, non-native language speakers, people with disabilities, immigrants and refugees, religious minorities, and so forth. Before introducing the critical mixed methods research (CMMR) guiding framework, it is imperative to delve into some of the critical advancements that have shaped this field.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 286
页数:21
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]   More than "papelitos:' a QuantCrit counterstory to critique Latina/o degree value and occupational prestige [J].
Huber, Lindsay Perez ;
Velez, Veronica N. ;
Solorzano, Daniel .
RACE ETHNICITY AND EDUCATION, 2018, 21 (02) :208-230
[22]  
Mertens D. M., 2022, ROUTLEDGE HDB ADV IN, P71, DOI [10.4324/9780429432828-7, DOI 10.4324/9780429432828-7]
[23]   Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation [J].
Mertens, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 1999, 20 (01) :1-14
[24]   Transformative considerations - Inclusion and social justice [J].
Mertens, Donna M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2007, 28 (01) :86-90
[25]   Transformative Mixed Methods Research [J].
Mertens, Donna M. .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2010, 16 (06) :469-474
[26]  
Moll LC., 1992, THEOR PRACT, V31, P132, DOI DOI 10.1080/00405849209543534
[27]  
Onwuegbuzie A.J., 2019, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, V11, P7, DOI [10.29034/ijmra.v11n1editorial2, DOI 10.29034/IJMRA.V11N1EDITORIAL1, 10.29034/ijmra.v11n1editorial1]
[28]  
Onwuegbuzie A. J., 2022, ROUTLEDGE HDB ADV IN
[29]  
Pasque PA, 2015, CRITICAL QUALITATIVE INQUIRY: FOUNDATIONS AND FUTURES, P139
[30]   NUMBERS AND WORDS - COMBINING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE METHODS IN A SINGLE LARGE-SCALE EVALUATION STUDY [J].
ROSSMAN, GB ;
WILSON, BL .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1985, 9 (05) :627-643