Improving the Consent Process With an Informed Consent Video Prior to Outpatient Colonoscopy

被引:0
作者
Lopes, Emily W. [1 ,2 ]
Boneschansker, Leo [1 ]
Chu, Jacqueline N. [3 ]
Ha, Jasmine B. [1 ]
Badran, Yousef R. [1 ]
Diaz, Paige McLean [1 ]
Przybyszewski, Eric M. [1 ]
Scheid, Johannes F. [1 ]
Subramanian, Sathish [1 ]
Velez, Christopher [1 ,4 ]
Wilechansky, Robert M. [1 ,2 ]
Changela, Meera [1 ]
Richter, James M. [1 ]
Uchida, Amiko M. [1 ,5 ]
Lochhead, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin & Translat Epidemiol Unit, Boston, MA USA
[3] Integrated Gastroenterol Consultants, N Chelmsford, MA USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Neurointestinal Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Utah, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
来源
GASTRO HEP ADVANCES | 2023年 / 2卷 / 08期
关键词
Informed Consent; Colonoscopy; Quality Improvement; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gastha.2023.07.016
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Informed consent should allow patients the appropriate time and conditions to make decisions about their care. However, consent is often obtained immediately prior to a colonoscopy. We conducted a quality improvement study to assess how a preprocedure consent video 2 days prior to an outpatient colonoscopy impacts patient satisfaction. METHODS: Patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy at a large academic medical center opted in to a text messaging platform for procedural information. Our intervention was an informed consent video 2 days before the colonoscopy. Our primary outcome was a composite patient satisfaction score. Pre and postintervention scores were compared using ordinal or multinomial logistic models to calculate odds ratios (OR) or relative risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: 1109 and 1452 patients completed > 1 survey question in the pre and postintervention phases, respectively. Overall patient satisfaction did not differ between groups [OR for a 1-point increment in satisfaction score between post- vs pre- intervention groups = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.90-1.22; P = .51]. Compared to preintervention, postintervention respondents were more likely to report higher satisfaction with time available to talk with their physician (OR of a 1-point increase in individual question response = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.09-1.54; P = .004). Compared to preintervention, more physicians in the postintervention phase rated satisfaction with consent process efficiency as " very satisfi ed " or " satis fi ed " (P < .001). CONCLUSION: An informed consent video prior to colonoscopy resulted in similar overall patient satisfaction. However, post-intervention, patients were more likely to report sufficient time to talk with their physician, and physicians reported higher satisfaction with consent efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:1082 / 1087
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL USING VIDEOTAPE TO PRESENT CONSENT INFORMATION FOR COLONOSCOPY
    AGRE, P
    KURTZ, RC
    KRAUSS, BJ
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (03) : 271 - 276
  • [2] The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study
    Brotons, Alicia
    Guilabert, Mercedes
    Javier Lacueva, Francisco
    Joaquin Mira, Jose
    Lumbreras, Blanca
    Dolores Pico, Maria
    Vitaller, Julian
    Fe Garcia-Sepulcre, Mariana
    Belda, German
    Sola-Vera, Javier
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (03)
  • [3] Open-access endoscopy
    Chandrasekhara, Vinay
    Eloubeidi, Mohamad A.
    Bruining, David H.
    Chathadi, Krishnavel
    Faulx, Ashley L.
    Fonkalsrud, Lisa
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    Lightdale, Jenifer R.
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    Pasha, Shabana
    Saltzman, John R.
    Shaukat, Aasma
    Wang, Amy
    Cash, Brooks
    DeWitt, John M.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (06) : 1326 - 1329
  • [4] What do patients really want to know in an informed consent procedure? A questionnaire-based survey of patients in the Bath area, UK
    El-Wakeel, H.
    Taylor, G. J.
    Tate, J. J. T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2006, 32 (10) : 612 - 616
  • [5] Effect of Consent and Educational Adjuncts to Consent on Patient Perceptions About Colonoscopy
    Fudman, David, I
    Papamichael, Konstantinos
    Roemi, Lilach
    Rao, Varun
    Falchuk, Kenneth R.
    Leffler, Daniel A.
    Feuerstein, Joseph D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 53 (08) : E316 - E321
  • [6] MALPRACTICE CLAIMS IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY - ANALYSIS OF AN INSURANCE INDUSTRY DATA-BASE
    GERSTENBERGER, PD
    PLUMERI, PA
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1993, 39 (02) : 132 - 138
  • [7] Development and validation of the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Satisfaction Questionnaire (GESQ)
    Hutchings, Hayley A.
    Cheung, Wai-Yee
    Alrubaiy, Laith
    Durai, Dharmaraj
    Russell, Ian T.
    Williams, John G.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 47 (12) : 1137 - 1143
  • [8] Video Consent for Colonoscopy Improves Knowledge Retention and Patient Satisfaction A Randomized Controlled Study
    Padival, Ruthvik
    Harris, Kevin B.
    Garber, Ari
    El-Khider, Faris
    Kichler, Adam
    Vargo, John
    Baggott, Brian B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 56 (05) : 433 - 437
  • [9] Does open access endoscopy close the door to an adequately informed patient?
    Staff, DM
    Saeian, K
    Rochling, F
    Narayanan, S
    Kern, M
    Shaker, R
    Hogan, WJ
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (02) : 212 - 217
  • [10] Effective communication enhances the patients' endoscopy experience
    Toomey, D. P.
    Hackett-Brennan, M.
    Corrigan, G.
    Singh, C.
    Nessim, G.
    Balfe, P.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 185 (01) : 203 - 214