Integration of Engineering Practices into Primary Science Classrooms

被引:0
作者
Garcia-Carmona, Antonio [1 ]
Munoz-Franco, Granada [1 ]
Cruz-Guzman, Marta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Dept Didact Ciencias Expt & Sociales, Seville, Spain
关键词
DESIGN-BASED SCIENCE; ELEMENTARY; CLASSIFICATION; KNOWLEDGE; STUDENTS; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1007/s11191-025-00616-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The integration of engineering practices into science education began to be explicitly promoted in the early twenty-first century and has since spread to many countries through recent curricular reforms. Despite this is fostered from the initial levels of education, there remains limited information on how to conduct it effectively in the classroom. To address this gap, a systematic review of studies published during the period 2001-2021 was conducted, focusing on the integration of engineering practices into primary education (6-12 years) science classes. A total of 24 studies were selected and analyzed to respond to how engineering practices are integrated into science classes, which engineering practices and science content are chosen, what challenges students are often faced with, and what evidence supports this curricular integration. The findings reveal that the predominant integration model is one that subordinates science to engineering learning using the project-based or design-based learning approach and teamwork. The most recurrent combination of engineering practices in the same learning situation is the one that includes "design solutions" and "obtaining, evaluating and/or communicating information," while the use of computational thinking was not addressed in the studies analyzed. Regarding science content, studies suggest that virtually any topic can be useful to integrate engineering practices, normally aimed at designing or constructing artifacts. However, the evidence found on the educational benefits and feasibility of integrating engineering practices into primary science education shows a still inconclusive scenario. The study concludes with a discussion of its limitations and implications for future research and practice.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Abraira V., 2001, SEMERGEN, V27, P247, DOI [10.1016/S1138-3593(01)73955-X, DOI 10.1016/S1138-3593(01)73955-X]
  • [2] Acevedo-Diaz J., 2006, Revista Eureka sobre Ensenanza y Divulgation de las Ciencias, V3, P198, DOI DOI 10.25267/REVEUREKAENSENDIVULGCIENC.2006.V3.I2.03
  • [3] The discussion on computational thinking in education
    Adell Segura, Jordi
    Llopis Nebot, Maria Angeles
    Esteve Mon, Francesc M.
    Valdeolivas Novella, Maria Gracia
    [J]. RIED-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2019, 22 (01): : 171 - 186
  • [4] The reality and obstacles of implementing primary teachers with the engineering design in teaching science
    Almuqbil, Norah Saleh M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 8 (09): : 86 - 93
  • [5] American Association for the Advancement of Science AAAS, 1990, Project 2061
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, Engineering K-12 education: Understanding the Status and Improving, DOI DOI 10.17226/12635
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2006, Spanish Official State Gazette, V293, P1
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2022, Official State Gazette, V52, P1
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2021, SCI ENG PRESCHOOL EL, DOI DOI 10.17226/26215
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2002, STANDARDS TECHNOLOGI