Technoeconomic and environmental performance assessment of solid oxide fuel cell-based cogeneration system configurations

被引:3
作者
Roy, Dibyendu [1 ]
Samanta, Samiran [1 ]
Roy, Sumit [1 ]
Smallbone, Andrew [1 ]
Roskilly, Anthony Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Dept Engn, Durham DH1 3LE, England
关键词
Hydrogen energy; Solid oxide fuel cell; CHP; Technoeconomic analysis; Decarbonisation; GAS-TURBINE; POWER-PLANTS; SOFC; CYCLE; INTEGRATION; SIMULATION; DRIVEN; HEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.133145
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, an innovative energy solution to fulfil the electricity and heating needs of a mixed community, including residences, a commercial building, and a small brewery has been investigated. The primary objective is to comprehensively analyse the technoeconomic, and environmental aspects of a UK-based solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) energy hub designed for local-scale electricity and heating demands. This present study investigates two different configurations: (a) SOFC-based cogeneration and (b) SOFC-heat pump cogeneration configuration. These configurations are modelled to provide year-round electricity and heating for a local scale application and are evaluated using hydrogen and natural gas as fuels. A thorough environmental assessment is also conducted for SOFC and SOFC-heat pump system configurations fuelled by natural gas. The hydrogen fuelled SOFC-heat pump configuration outperforms other system configuration with energy efficiency of 96 %. Meanwhile, the hydrogen-fuelled SOFC cogeneration system yields maximum exergy efficiency at 61.51 %. The natural gas-powered SOFC-heat pump cogeneration system yields the lowest levelized cost of energy (LCOE) at 0.1603 pound/kWh, in comparison to the higher LCOE of 0.213 pound/kWh for the alkaline hydrogen-fuelled system. The natural gas-fuelled SOFC system emits 0.3352 kg/kWh of CO2, with even lower emissions of 0.275 kg/kWh for the SOFC-heat pump system configuration.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Adrian Bejan Michael J Moran., 1996, Thermal design and optimization
[2]   A comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of a novel CHP system based on SOFC and APC cycles [J].
Ahmadi, Samareh ;
Ghaebi, Hadi ;
Shokri, Afshar .
ENERGY, 2019, 186
[3]   A comparative investigation of syngas and biofuel power and hydrogen plant combining nanomaterial-supported solid oxide fuel cell with vanadium-chlorine thermochemical cycle [J].
Al-Rashed, Abdullah A. A. A. ;
Alsarraf, Jalal ;
Alnaqi, Abdulwahab A. .
FUEL, 2023, 331
[4]   A comprehensive review on renewable energy integration for combined heat and power production [J].
Bagherian, Mohammad Ali ;
Mehranzamir, Kamyar .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 224
[5]   Systematic analysis and multi-objective optimization of an integrated power and freshwater production cycle [J].
Bahari, Mehran ;
Entezari, Ashkan ;
Esmaeilion, Farbod ;
Ahmadi, Abolfazl .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (43) :18831-18856
[6]   Exergetic and thermoeconomic analysis of a trigeneration system producing electricity, hot water, and fresh water driven by low-temperature geothermal sources [J].
Behnam, Pooria ;
Arefi, Alireza ;
Shafii, Mohammad Behshad .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 157 :266-276
[7]  
BEIS, 2021, UK Hydrogen Strategy
[8]  
BEIS, 2021, Net zero Strategy
[9]   A combined heat and green hydrogen (CHH) generator integrated with a heat network [J].
Burrin, Dominic ;
Roy, Sumit ;
Roskilly, Anthony Paul ;
Smallbone, Andrew .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 246
[10]   Design and analysis of a hybrid space heating system based on HT-PEM fuel cell and an air source heat pump with a novel heat recovery strategy [J].
Capuano, Margherita ;
Sorrentino, Marco ;
Agelin-Chaab, Martin .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 231