Development of qualified items for nursing education assessment: The progress testing experience

被引:0
作者
Dias, Bruna Moreno [1 ]
da Silva, Lucia Marta Giunta [2 ]
Hamamoto Filho, Pedro Tadao [3 ]
Bollela, Valdes Roberto [4 ]
Gabriel, Carmen Silvia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Coll Nursing, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Paulista Sch Nursing, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Med Sch, Botucatu, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Education; Nursing; Baccalaureate; Nursing students; Academic performance; Formative feedback; Nursing faculty; Universities; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; MEDICINE; STUDENTS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104199
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: To analyze the psychometric characteristics of items in the nursing inter-institutional progress testing for the years 2019, 2021, 2022 and 2023. Background: Progress testing is a validated method for evaluating professional undergraduate education, aimed at identifying knowledge gain in a continuous and progressive manner, with potential benefits for nursing education. However, for its results to be useful, the evaluation items used in the test must have good psychometric performance. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: A sample of 377 items (multiple-choice questions) was applied to 4678 students in four years of progress testing. The difficulty and discrimination indexes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA and simple linear regression. Results: The average difficulty index of the test items ranged between 0.39 and 0.46. The areas of child and adolescent health, women's health and adult health had the most difficult items, while the areas of management, mental health and public health had the least difficult items. Discrimination index ranged from 0.35 to 0.43. There was a difference between discrimination index between the years of application (p < 0.001), with a significant increase in the discrimination index (p < 0.001) in the trend analysis. Students in the final years showed lower levels of difficulty and discrimination when compared with students in the initial years, demonstrating that the test is easier and there is less dispersion of performance among students in the final years. Conclusions: The items are not difficult and have good discrimination. A gradual annual increase in the discrimination index of the items was observed. This study provides useful information for the psychometric analysis and quality assurance of knowledge assessment items, both for the implementation of similar PT experiences and in the use of multiple-choice questions for other knowledge assessment purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Abdellatif H., 2024, Educ. Med., V25, DOI [10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100906, DOI 10.1016/J.EDUMED.2024.100906]
  • [2] Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study
    Abdulghani, Hamza Mohammad
    Irshad, Mohammad
    Haque, Shafiul
    Ahmed, Tauseef
    Satter, Kamran
    Khalil, Mahmoud Salah
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10):
  • [3] Faculty development programs improve the quality of Multiple Choice Questions items' writing
    Abdulghani, Hamza Mohammad
    Ahmad, Farah
    Irshad, Mohammad
    Khalil, Mahmoud Salah
    Al-Shaikh, Ghadeer Khalid
    Syed, Sadiqa
    Aldrees, Abdulmajeed Abdurrahman
    Alrowais, Norah
    Haque, Shafiul
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [4] 10 years of experience in adopting, implementing and evaluating progress testing for Saudi medical students
    Alamro, Ahmad S.
    Alghasham, Abdullah A.
    Al-Shobaili, Hani A.
    Alhomaidan, Homaidan T.
    Salem, Tarek A.
    Wadi, Majed M.
    Saleh, Mohamed N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 18 (01): : 175 - 185
  • [5] Impact of Progress testing on the learning experiences of students in medicine, dentistry and dental therapy
    Ali, Kamran
    Cockerill, Josephine
    Zahra, Daniel
    Tredwin, Christopher
    Ferguson, Colin
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18
  • [6] The Impact of item flaws, testing at low cognitive level, and low distractor functioning on multiple-choice question quality
    Ali, Syed Haris
    Ruit, Kenneth G.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 4 (05) : 244 - 251
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2021, Global strategic directions for Nursing and Midwifery 2021-2025
  • [8] Bicudo Angélica Maria, 2019, Rev. bras. educ. med., V43, P151, DOI 10.1590/1981-52712015v43n4rb20190018
  • [9] Introducing progress testing in McMaster University's problem-based medical curriculum: Psychometric properties and effect on learning
    Blake, JM
    Norman, GR
    Keane, DR
    Mueller, CB
    Cunnington, J
    Didyk, N
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (09) : 1002 - 1007
  • [10] Bollela Valdes Roberto, 2018, Rev. bras. educ. med., V42, P74, DOI 10.1590/1981-52712015v42n4rb20160065