Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility using Geospatial Techniques: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Statistical Models

被引:1
作者
Raut, Subrata [1 ]
Dutta, Dipanwita [1 ]
Bera, Debarati [1 ]
Samanta, Rajeeb [2 ]
机构
[1] Vidyasagar Univ, Dept Remote Sensing & GIS, Midnapore, W Bengal, India
[2] Prabhat Kumar Coll, Dept Geog, Contai, W Bengal, India
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
evident belief function; frequency ratio; geospatial datasets; Kalimpong; random forest; support vector machine; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; FREQUENCY RATIO MODEL; BELIEF FUNCTION MODEL; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; PROCESS AHP; DARJEELING HIMALAYA; NEURAL-NETWORKS; HAZARD; ZONATION; PARTS;
D O I
10.1002/gj.5080
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study delineates landslide susceptibility zones in the Kalimpong district by integrating multi-sensor datasets and assessing the effectiveness of statistical and machine learning models for precision mapping. The analysis utilises a comprehensive geospatial dataset, including remote sensing imagery, topographical, geological, and climatic factors. Four models were employed to generate landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) using 16 influencing factors: two bivariate statistical models, frequency ratio (FR) and evidence belief function (EBF) and two machine learning models, random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM). Out of 1244 recorded landslide events, 871 events (70%) were used for training the models, and 373 events (30%) for validation. The distribution of susceptibility classes predicted by The RF and SVM models produced similar susceptibility distributions, predicting 13.30% and 14.30% of the area as highly susceptible, and 2.42% and 2.82% as very highly susceptible, respectively. In contrast, the FR model estimated 20.98% of the area as highly susceptible and 4.30% as very highly susceptible, whereas the EBF model predicted 17.42% and 5.89% for these categories, respectively. Model validation using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves revealed that the machine learning models (RF and SVM) had superior prediction accuracy with AUC values of 95.90% and 86.60%, respectively, compared to the statistical models (FR and EBF), which achieved AUC values of 74.30% and 76.80%. The findings indicate that Kalimpong-I is most vulnerable, with 6.76% of its area categorised as very high susceptibility and 24.80% as high susceptibility. Conversely, the Gorubathan block exhibited the least susceptible, with 0.95% and 6.48% of its area classified as very high and high susceptibility, respectively. This research provides essential insights for decision-makers and policy planners in landslide-prone regions and can be instrumental in developing early warning systems, which are vital for enhancing community safety through timely evacuations and preparedness measures.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1149
页数:21
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [1] Abdi A., 2021, Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using GISBased Fuzzy Logic and the Analytical Hierarchical Processes Approach: A Case Study in Constantine (NorthEast Algeria), V39, P5675, DOI [10.1007/s10706-021-01855-3, DOI 10.1007/S10706-021-01855-3]
  • [2] Application of machine learning in the assessment of landslide susceptibility: A case study of mountainous eastern Mediterranean region, Syria
    Abdo, Hazem Ghassan
    Richi, Sahar Mohammed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KING SAUD UNIVERSITY SCIENCE, 2024, 36 (05)
  • [3] Improving Spatial Agreement in Machine Learning-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Adnan, Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani
    Rahman, Md Salman
    Ahmed, Nahian
    Ahmed, Bayes
    Rabbi, Md. Fazleh
    Rahman, Rashedur M.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (20) : 1 - 23
  • [4] Comparative analysis of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and frequency ratio (FR) models for landslide susceptibility mapping in Reshun, NW Pakistan
    Ahmad, Mukhtar S.
    MonaLisa
    Khan, Saad
    [J]. KUWAIT JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2023, 50 (03) : 387 - 398
  • [5] Random Forest-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Coastal Regions of Artvin, Turkey
    Akinci, Halil
    Kilicoglu, Cem
    Dogan, Sedat
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2020, 9 (09)
  • [6] Application of GIS-based analytic hierarchy process and frequency ratio model to flood vulnerable mapping and risk area estimation at Sundarban region, India
    Ali, Sk Ajim
    Khatun, Rumana
    Ahmad, Ateeque
    Ahmad, Syed Naushad
    [J]. MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 5 (03) : 1083 - 1102
  • [7] Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping
    Althuwaynee, Omar F.
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Lee, Saro
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 44 : 120 - 135
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2009, National Disaster Management Guidelines Management of Nuclear and Radiological Emergencies
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2017, Laser Scanning Applications in Landslide Assessment
  • [10] An artificial neural network approach for landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas
    Arora, MK
    Das Gupta, AS
    Gupta, RP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 25 (03) : 559 - 572