A case report on the management of congenital urethroperineal fistula in an adolescent, a rare congenital anomaly

被引:1
作者
Shiferaw, Samuel Fekadu [1 ]
Molla, Mezgeb Gedefe [1 ,2 ]
Feye, Yoseph Abebe [1 ]
机构
[1] Addis Ababa Univ, CHS, Sch Med, Urol Unit,Dept Surg, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[2] Menelik II Comprehens Specialized Hosp, Dept Surg, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS | 2025年 / 128卷
关键词
CUPF; Ethiopia; Duplicate urethra; Congenital fistula; Rare case;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111043
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Congenital posterior urethra perineal fistula (CUPF) is a rare congenital GU anomaly with abnormal epithelium-lined communication between the posterior urethra and perineum. Some consider it to be a variant of Y-type urethral duplicate with ventral hypoplastic urethra and have suggested its adoption to the Eiffmans classification. Case presentation: An 18-year-old male patient presented with urine dribbling from the perineum since childhood. He has no history of urinary tract infection and surgical procedure and instrumentation. There was normal external genitalia with meatus positioned at the tip of the glans; there was a small opening on the posterior scrotal wall near the perineum that admits a 6fr NG tube. VCUG showed a fistula from the prostatic urethra to the perineum. He was managed with near-total excision of the fistula tract, with no recurrence on a 3-month followup. Discussion: Patients with this rare condition present with dribbling from perineum during voiding, underwear wetting and recurrent UTI. Voiding CUG is a diagnostic procedure of choice for patients with CUPF. MRI can be used if there is interest in detail anatomy of the fistula tract and its relationship to the surrounding structures and is also helpful if other modalities show a non-conclusive result. In managing this patient, differentiating the dominant and functional urethra is of clinical significance. Complete or partial excision, electrofulgration of the fistula tract are options. Conclusion: Voiding CUG is a diagnostic procedure of choice for patients with CUPF and partial excision of the fistula tract is an option of management with satisfactory result.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Gozar H., Bara Z., Kovacs E., Gozar I., Derzsi Z., Urethral multiplicity in boys: systematic review of case reports and case series from the last 15 years, Front. Pediatr., 12, (2024)
[2]  
Perez J.F., Diaz B., A. M., Ramos G.U., Peralta S.R., Congenital posterior urethral fistulae: literature review and case report, Urol. Int., 101, 1, pp. 121-124, (2018)
[3]  
Brown W.C., Dillon P.W., Hensle T.W., Congenital urethral-perineal fistula: diagnosis and new surgical management, Urology, 36, 2, pp. 157-159, (1990)
[4]  
Deeb M.A., Gawrieh B., Hemi F., Alelayan A.F., Omran A., An unusual Y-type urethral duplication in a boy, J Pediatr Surg Case Rep, 78, (2022)
[5]  
Bello J.O., Congenital posterior urethroperineal fistula: a review and report of the 25th case in literature, Urology, 84, 6, pp. 1492-1495, (2014)
[6]  
Nhungo C.J., Angelo J., Macha F., Quinn F., Mtaturu G., Mkony C., Successful surgical excision of the accessory urethra in a 13-year-old boy with Effmann Type IIA-2 urethral duplication. Case report and literature review, Int. J. Surg. Case Rep., 118, (2024)
[7]  
Ghadimi-Mahani M., Dillman J.R., Pai D., Park J., DiPietro M., MRI of congenital urethroperineal fistula, Pediatr. Radiol., 40, S1, pp. 1-5, (2010)
[8]  
Bedir S., Kilciler M., Ozgok Y., Case report: endoscopic treatment of isolated congenital urethroperineal fistula, J. Endourol., 20, 1, pp. 42-44, (2006)
[9]  
Sohrabi C., Mathew G., Maria N., Kerwan A., Franchi T., Agha R.A., The SCARE 2023 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines, Int. J. Surg., 109, 5, pp. 1136-1140, (2023)
[10]  
Sakaguchi T., Hamada Y., Matsushima H., Hamada H., Shirai T., Shigeta Y., Kon M., Congenital urethroperineal fistula, J Pediatr Surg Case Rep, 28, pp. 17-20, (2018)