World Trade Organization (WTO) trade policy reviews and green technology adoption: Global evidence

被引:3
作者
Tanveer, Arifa [1 ]
Zeng, Shihong [1 ]
Zaman, Rashid [2 ]
Scagnelli, Simone [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Appl Econ Dept, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, 270 Joondalup Dr, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Trade policy reviews (TPR); Green technology adoption; Political risk; External monitors; Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG); SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; POLITICAL UNCERTAINTY; PROPENSITY SCORE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; IMPACT; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103715
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of WTO climate-related Trade Policy Reviews (TPR) on corporate efforts towards going green, specifically focusing on green technology adoption. Utilising a longitudinal sample comprising 30 countries from 2009 to 2019, the study provides original evidence that companies in countries with more frequent TPRs tend to adopt more green technologies. Channel analysis reveals that countries with climatefocused TPR entries, climate-related notifications, and climate-related measures effectively reduce managerial political risk perception, thereby facilitating the companies' adoption of green technologies. Additional analysis suggests a substitutive role of trade policy reviews (TPR) compared to firm-specific external monitors in promoting the adoption of green technologies. The findings also indicate a significant reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from the combined effect of climate-related TPR and increased green technology adoption. The study's baseline results remain robust even after applying various estimation techniques, such as Propensity Score matching, Entropy Balancing, and System GMM. This study's novel findings, emphasising the risk reduction and monitoring functions of such reviews in shaping companies' environmental strategies towards sustainability, provide valuable insights to policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   THE EFFECTS OF MANDATORY AND VOLUNTARY REGULATORY PRESSURES ON FIRMS' ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH [J].
Alberto Aragon-Correa, J. ;
Marcus, Alfred A. ;
Vogel, David .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2020, 14 (01) :339-365
[2]   Corporate commitment to climate change: The effect of eco-innovation and climate governance [J].
Albitar, Khaldoon ;
Al -Shaer, Habiba ;
Liu, Yang Stephanie .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2023, 52 (02)
[3]   Political uncertainty and corporate investment: Evidence from China [J].
An, Heng ;
Chen, Yanyan ;
Luo, Danglun ;
Zhang, Ting .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2016, 36 :174-189
[4]  
Analytica O., Emerald Expert Briefings(oxanes)., DOI [10.1108/OXAN-ES265117, DOI 10.1108/OXAN-ES265117]
[5]   On the evolution of firm size distributions [J].
Angelini, Paolo ;
Generale, Andrea .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (01) :426-438
[6]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51
[7]  
Ataila G., 2022, These six government priorities can help accelerate the evolution to a green, net-zero future
[8]   Unleashing the impact of ecological civilization pilot policies on green technology innovation: Evidence from a novel SC-DID model [J].
Bai, Dongbei ;
Hu, Jin ;
Irfan, Muhammad ;
Hu, Mingjun .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 125
[9]   Necessity as the mother of "green' inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Fosfuri, Andrea ;
Gelabert, Liliana ;
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (08) :891-909
[10]   Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Blundell, R ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 87 (01) :115-143