Effect of diabetes medications on the risk of developing dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or cognitive decline: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Hui, Esther K. [1 ]
Mukadam, Naaheed [1 ]
Kohl, Gianna [2 ]
Livingston, Gill [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Div Psychiat, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7NF, England
[2] UCL, Div Psychol & Language Sci, London, England
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; cognitive decline; cognitive impairment; dementia; diabetes; prevention; risk factors; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; INCIDENT DEMENTIA; SULFONYLUREA USE; OLDER-ADULTS; METFORMIN; PIOGLITAZONE; ROSIGLITAZONE; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE; INHIBITORS;
D O I
10.1177/13872877251319054
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Diabetes is a risk factor for dementia, but we do not know whether specific diabetes medications ameliorate this risk. Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze such medication's effect on the risk of developing dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or cognitive decline. Methods: We searched three databases until 21 November 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT), cohort, and case-control studies assessing association between antidiabetic medication and future dementia, MCI, or cognitive decline. We meta-analyzed studies separately for individual drug classes and their comparators (no medication, placebo, or another drug). We appraised study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale. Results: 42 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) versus placebo reduced dementia risk by 53% in three RCTs (n = 15,820, RR = 0.47[0.25, 0.86]) and 27% in three case-control studies (n = 312,856, RR = 0.73[0.54, 0.99], I-2 = 96%). Repaglinide was superior to glibenclamide by 0.8 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination scale in another RCT. Meta-analysis of seven longitudinal studies showed glitazones (n = 1,081,519, RR = 0.78[0.76, 0.81], I-2 = 0%) were associated with reduced dementia risk. Metformin (n = 999,349, RR = 0.94[0.79, 1.13], I-2 = 98.4%), sulfonylureas (RR = 0.98[0.78, 1.22], I-2 = 83.3%), dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors (DPP-1V) (n = 192,802, RR = 0.86[0.65, 1.15], I-2 = 92.9%) and insulin (n = 571,274, RR = 1.09[0.95, 1.25], I-2 = 94.8%) were not. Most studies were observational and limited by confounding by indication. Conclusions: In people with diabetes, RCTs consistently showed GLP-RAs reduce future dementia risk. Glitazones consistently showed protective effects, without heterogeneity, suggesting potential generalizability of these results. Metformin, sulfonylureas, insulin, and DPP-1V studies had inconsistent findings. If information is available future studies should consider dosage, severity, and duration.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cystatin C and Risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nair, Pallavi
    Misra, Shubham
    Nath, Manabesh
    Vibha, Deepti
    Srivastava, Achal Kumar
    Prasad, Kameshwar
    Kumar, Pradeep
    DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2021, 49 (05) : 471 - 482
  • [32] Risk of developing dementia in people with diabetes and mild cognitive impairment
    Velayudhan, Latha
    Poppe, Michaela
    Archer, Nicola
    Proitsi, Petroula
    Brown, Richard G.
    Lovestone, Simon
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 196 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [33] Mild cognitive impairment and progression to dementia in people with diabetes, prediabetes and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pal, Kingshuk
    Mukadam, Naaheed
    Petersen, Irene
    Cooper, Claudia
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (11) : 1149 - 1160
  • [34] Mild cognitive impairment and progression to dementia in people with diabetes, prediabetes and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kingshuk Pal
    Naaheed Mukadam
    Irene Petersen
    Claudia Cooper
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2018, 53 : 1149 - 1160
  • [35] The prognosis of mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Salemme, Simone
    Lombardo, Flavia Lucia
    Lacorte, Eleonora
    Sciancalepore, Francesco
    Remoli, Giulia
    Bacigalupo, Ilaria
    Piscopo, Paola
    Zamboni, Giovanna
    Rossini, Paolo Maria
    Cappa, Stefano Francesco
    Perani, Daniela
    Spadin, Patrizia
    Tagliavini, Fabrizio
    Vanacore, Nicola
    Ancidoni, Antonio
    ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA: DIAGNOSIS, ASSESSMENT & DISEASE MONITORING, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [36] Combined exercise and cognitive interventions for adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Xue, Dandan
    Li, Polly W. C.
    Yu, Doris S. F.
    Lin, Rose S. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2023, 147
  • [37] Effectiveness of Computerized Cognitive Training in Delaying Cognitive Function Decline in People With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Li, Ran
    Geng, Jiawei
    Yang, Runze
    Ge, Yumeng
    Hesketh, Therese
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (10)
  • [38] Motoric cognitive risk syndrome as a predictive factor of cognitive impairment and dementia - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lim, Nicholas E. -Kai
    Yeo, Brian Sheng Yep
    Lee, Rachel Siying
    Lim, Jun Xiang
    Chan, Yiong Huak
    Kandiah, Nagaendran
    Ho, Roger
    Ho, Cyrus Su Hui
    Woo, Jean
    Arai, Hidenori
    Merchant, Reshma Aziz
    AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2024, 101
  • [39] Association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with mild cognitive impairment and dementia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li-Ying Zhao
    Xue-Lai Zhou
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2022, 10 (11) : 3449 - 3460
  • [40] Depressive symptoms increase the risk of progression to dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mourao, Raimundo J.
    Mansur, Guilherme
    Malloy-Diniz, Leandro F.
    Costa, Erico Castro
    Diniz, Breno S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 31 (08) : 905 - 911