A little goes a long way: A comparison of enterolithotomy versus single-stage cholecystectomy in the management of gallstone ileus

被引:0
作者
Khurshid, Muhammad Haris [1 ]
Hejazi, Omar [1 ]
Spencer, Audrey L. [1 ]
Nelson, Adam [1 ]
Stewart, Collin [1 ]
Colosimo, Christina [1 ]
Ditillo, Micheal [1 ]
Matthews, Marc R. [1 ]
Magnotti, Louis J. [1 ]
Joseph, Bellal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care Emergency Surg & Burns, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
Gallstone ileus; enterolithotomy; cholecystectomy; DISEASE; GALLBLADDER; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000004497
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTIONGallstone ileus is an infrequent complication of cholelithiasis with no specific guidelines for its management. This study aims to compare the outcomes of patients with gallstone ileus managed with both enterolithotomy with cholecystectomy (EL-CCY) versus those managed with enterolithotomy (EL) only. METHODSIn this retrospective analysis of 2011-2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database, all patients with an index admission diagnosis of gallstone ileus were included. Patients were stratified based on the type of intervention received for gallstone ileus into those who underwent EL-CCY and those who underwent EL alone and compared. Primary outcomes were in-hospital complications (surgical site infections, sepsis, pneumonia, cardiac arrest, deep vein thrombosis, intestinal obstruction) and mortality. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, hospital costs, and readmissions rate and cause of readmissions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTSA total of 1,960 patients were identified. The mean age was 67 years and 67% were female. Two hundred eighty-nine patients (14.7%) were managed with EL-CCY, whereas 1,671 patients (85.3%) underwent EL only. Overall, the readmission rate was 4.8%, whereas mortality was 4.2%. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of index-admission complications (24.8% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.415), mortality (6.2% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.068), rates of readmission (3.5% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.22), and cause of readmission (p > 0.05). Enterolithotomy and cholecystectomy group had significantly longer hospital length of stay (10 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001) and median hospital costs ($70,959 vs. $52,147, p < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, female sex was a predictor of undergoing EL-CCY, whereas increasing age and higher grade of all-patient redefined diagnosis-related groups risk of mortality were independently associated with lower odds of undergoing EL-CCY. CONCLUSIONOur findings suggest no difference between EL compared with EL-CCY in terms of complications, readmissions, and mortality. However, patients managed with EL-CCY had a longer hospital stay and higher hospital costs compared with EL. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and develop management protocols for gallstone ileus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCETherapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 654
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Abou-Saif A, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P249
  • [2] Aldo Carnevale, 2020, Surg Res Pract, V2020, P1421753, DOI 10.1155/2020/1421753
  • [3] From surveillance to surgery: The delayed implications of non-operative and operative management of pancreatic injuries
    Alizai, Qaidar
    Anand, Tanya
    Bhogadi, Sai Krishna
    Nelson, Adam
    Hosseinpour, Hamidreza
    Stewart, Collin
    Spencer, Audrey L.
    Colosimo, Christina
    Ditillo, Michael
    Joseph, Bellal
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 226 (05) : 682 - 687
  • [4] Recurrent gallstone ileus due to a residual gallstone: A case report and literature review
    Apollos, J. R.
    Guest, R., V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2015, 13 : 12 - 14
  • [5] Frail geriatric patients with acute calculous cholecystitis: Operative versus nonoperative management?
    Asmar, Samer
    Bible, Letitia
    Obaid, Omar
    Anand, Tanya
    Chehab, Mohamad
    Ditillo, Michael
    Castanon, Lourdes
    Nelson, Adam
    Joseph, Bellal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2021, 91 (01) : 219 - 225
  • [6] IMPROVING THE OUTCOME IN GALLSTONE ILEUS
    DEITZ, DM
    STANDAGE, BA
    PINSON, CW
    MCCONNELL, DB
    KRIPPAEHNE, WW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 151 (05) : 572 - 576
  • [7] Comparison of surgical treatments of gallstone ileus:: Preliminary report
    Doko, M
    Zovak, M
    Kopljar, M
    Glavan, E
    Ljubicic, N
    Hochstädter, H
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 27 (04) : 400 - 404
  • [8] Recurrent gallstone ileus: Underestimated
    Doogue, MP
    Choong, CK
    Frizelle, FA
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 68 (11): : 755 - 756
  • [9] Gallstones in obesity and weight loss
    Erlinger, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2000, 12 (12) : 1347 - 1352
  • [10] Surgery for Gallstone Ileus A Nationwide Comparison of Trends and Outcomes
    Halabi, Wissam J.
    Kang, Celeste Y.
    Ketana, Noor
    Lafaro, Kelly J.
    Nguyen, Vinh Q.
    Stamos, Michael J.
    Imagawa, David K.
    Demirjian, Aram N.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 259 (02) : 329 - 335