Methylation Biomarkers of Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Dolcini, Jacopo [1 ]
Chiavarini, Manuela [2 ]
Firmani, Giorgio [1 ]
Brennan, Kasey J. M. [3 ]
Cardenas, Andres [4 ]
Baccarelli, Andrea A. [3 ]
Barbadoro, Pamela [1 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Univ Marche Reg, Dept Biomed Sci & Publ Hlth, Sect Hyg Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Hlth Sci, I-50134 Florence, Italy
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
关键词
lung cancer; DNA methylation; blood; meta-analysis; systematic review; epigenetic age; public health; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENETIC AGE; DOSE-RESPONSE; MORTALITY; BREAST; ACCELERATION; PATTERNS; MARKER; SEX;
D O I
10.3390/cancers17040690
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide among both men and women, and represents a major public health challenge. DNA methylation (DNAm) has shown potential in identifying individuals at higher risk of LC, but the overall evidence has not been systematically evaluated. This review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate and summarize existing research on the association between blood DNAm levels and LC risk. Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published until February 2024, following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria. Results: Using a random effects model, our pooled analysis showed a significant association between increased DNAm levels and LC risk (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10-1.39; I2 = 93.90%, p = 0.0001). Stratifying the results by study design showed a stronger association in two prospective cohort studies (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.36-1.90; I2 = 14.42%, p = 0.32), while case-control studies showed a weaker association (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99-1.11; I2 = 70.57%, p = 0.0001). Sensitivity analyses indicated that omitting individual studies did not significantly alter the LC risk estimates. Conclusions: These findings suggest that higher blood DNAm levels are associated with an increased risk of LC, especially in long-term cohort studies. Further research is recommended to explore the potential of DNAm as a screening biomarker for LC and to clarify the role of other influencing factors.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic effectiveness of human papillomavirus methylation biomarkers for detection of cervical cancer
    Hillyar, Christopher Rt
    Kanabar, Shivani S.
    Pufal, Kamil R.
    Lawson, Alexander W.
    Hee, Joshua Li Saw
    Rallis, Kathrine S.
    Nibber, Anjan
    Sideris, Michail
    EPIGENOMICS, 2022, 14 (18) : 1055 - 1072
  • [32] Association between RASSF1A Promoter Methylation and Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pan, Jincheng
    Chen, Junxing
    Zhang, Bo
    Chen, Xu
    Huang, Bin
    Zhuang, Jintao
    Mo, Chengqiang
    Qiu, Shaopeng
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09):
  • [33] Association of isoflavone biomarkers with risk of chronic disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Rienks, Johanna
    Barbaresko, Janett
    Noethlings, Ute
    NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2017, 75 (08) : 616 - 641
  • [34] Tuberculosis and risk of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luczynski, Pauline
    Poulin, Philip
    Romanowski, Kamila
    Johnston, James C.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [35] Risk of Lung Cancer in Workers Exposed to Benzidine and/or Beta-Naphthylamine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tomioka, Kimiko
    Saeki, Keigo
    Obayashi, Kenji
    Kurumatani, Norio
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (09) : 447 - 458
  • [36] Prevalence and risk factors of sleep disturbances among patients with lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Ying
    Xiao, Lily Dongxia
    Tang, Caiyun
    Cao, Wenhui
    Wang, Yao
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (09)
  • [37] Is COVID-19 a high risk factor for lung cancer? A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Mingxin
    Mou, Ruiyu
    Liu, Xiaodi
    Guo, Shanqi
    Kong, Fanming
    Li, Xiaojiang
    Jia, Yingjie
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (01) : E23877
  • [38] Incidence and risk factors of pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Deng, Ting
    Song, Jiamei
    Tuo, Jinmei
    Wang, Yu
    Li, Jin
    Suen, Lorna Kwai Ping
    Liang, Yan
    Ma, Junliang
    Chen, Shaolin
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (12)
  • [39] Magnesium intake and lung cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dana, Nasim
    Karimi, Raheleh
    Mansourian, Marjan
    Javanmard, Shaghayegh Haghjooy
    Laher, Ismail
    Vaseghi, Golnaz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR VITAMIN AND NUTRITION RESEARCH, 2021, 91 (5-6) : 539 - 546
  • [40] The composition of lung microbiome in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sadaf Najafi
    Fatemeh Abedini
    Sadegh Azimzadeh Jamalkandi
    Parvin Shariati
    Ali Ahmadi
    Mohammad Gholami Fesharaki
    BMC Microbiology, 21