Methylation Biomarkers of Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Dolcini, Jacopo [1 ]
Chiavarini, Manuela [2 ]
Firmani, Giorgio [1 ]
Brennan, Kasey J. M. [3 ]
Cardenas, Andres [4 ]
Baccarelli, Andrea A. [3 ]
Barbadoro, Pamela [1 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Univ Marche Reg, Dept Biomed Sci & Publ Hlth, Sect Hyg Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, I-60126 Ancona, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Hlth Sci, I-50134 Florence, Italy
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
关键词
lung cancer; DNA methylation; blood; meta-analysis; systematic review; epigenetic age; public health; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENETIC AGE; DOSE-RESPONSE; MORTALITY; BREAST; ACCELERATION; PATTERNS; MARKER; SEX;
D O I
10.3390/cancers17040690
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide among both men and women, and represents a major public health challenge. DNA methylation (DNAm) has shown potential in identifying individuals at higher risk of LC, but the overall evidence has not been systematically evaluated. This review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate and summarize existing research on the association between blood DNAm levels and LC risk. Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published until February 2024, following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria. Results: Using a random effects model, our pooled analysis showed a significant association between increased DNAm levels and LC risk (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10-1.39; I2 = 93.90%, p = 0.0001). Stratifying the results by study design showed a stronger association in two prospective cohort studies (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.36-1.90; I2 = 14.42%, p = 0.32), while case-control studies showed a weaker association (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99-1.11; I2 = 70.57%, p = 0.0001). Sensitivity analyses indicated that omitting individual studies did not significantly alter the LC risk estimates. Conclusions: These findings suggest that higher blood DNAm levels are associated with an increased risk of LC, especially in long-term cohort studies. Further research is recommended to explore the potential of DNAm as a screening biomarker for LC and to clarify the role of other influencing factors.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and risk of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kwak, Kyeongmin
    Paek, Domyung
    Park, Jong-Tae
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2020, 63 (04) : 312 - 327
  • [22] Prevalence and risk factors of depression in patients with lung cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yan, Xiao-ru
    Chen, Xun
    Zhang, Peitong
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [23] Environmental exposure to asbestos and the risk of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kwak, Kyeongmin
    Kang, Dongmug
    Paek, Domyung
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2022, 79 (03) : 207 - 214
  • [24] Reproductive factors and lung cancer risk: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yin, Xin
    Zhu, Zhiying
    Hosgood, H. Dean
    Lan, Qing
    Seow, Wei Jie
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [25] Reproductive factors and lung cancer risk: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xin Yin
    Zhiying Zhu
    H. Dean Hosgood
    Qing Lan
    Wei Jie Seow
    BMC Public Health, 20
  • [26] Screening for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ali, Muhammad Usman
    Miller, John
    Peirson, Leslea
    Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna
    Kenny, Meghan
    Sherifali, Diana
    Raina, Parminder
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 89 : 301 - 314
  • [27] Prevalence of lung cancer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Guixiang
    Li, Xuanlin
    Lei, Siyuan
    Zhao, Hulei
    Zhang, Hailong
    Li, Jiansheng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [28] Association between family history of lung cancer and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ang, Lina
    Chan, Cheryl Pui Yi
    Yau, Wai-Ping
    Seow, Wei Jie
    LUNG CANCER, 2020, 148 : 129 - 137
  • [29] Incidence Trend of Lung Cancer in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Bastani, Elham
    Shokri, Fariba
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [30] Socioeconomic differences in lung cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sidorchuk, Anna
    Agardh, Emilie E.
    Aremu, Olatunde
    Hallqvist, Johan
    Allebeck, Peter
    Moradi, Tahereh
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2009, 20 (04) : 459 - 471