A framework for fused deposition modelling process evaluation using multivariate process capability analysis

被引:0
作者
Alatefi, Moath [1 ]
Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman M. [1 ]
AlFaify, Abdullah Yahia [1 ]
Saleh, Mustafa [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 12期
关键词
PERFORMANCE; PARTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0308380
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The rapid advancement of additive manufacturing (AM) requires researchers to keep up with these advancements by continually improving the AM processes. Improving manufacturing processes involves evaluating the process outputs and their conformity to the required specifications. Process capability indices, calculated using critical quality characteristics (QCs), have long been used in the evaluation process due to their proven effectiveness. AM processes typically involve multi-correlated critical QCs, indicating the need to develop a multivariate process capability index (MPCI) rather than a univariate capability index, which may lead to misleading results. In this regard, this study proposes a general methodological framework for evaluating AM processes using MPCI. The proposed framework starts by identifying the AM process and product design. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is chosen for this investigation. Then, the specification limits associated with critical QCs are established. To ensure that the MPCI assumptions are met, the critical QCs data are examined for normality, stability, and correlation. Additionally, the MPCI is estimated by simulating a large sample using the properties of the collected QCs data and determining the percent of nonconforming (PNC). Furthermore, the FDM process and its capable tolerance limits are then assessed using the proposed MPCI. Finally, the study presents a sensitivity analysis of the FDM process and suggestions for improvement based on the analysis of assignable causes of variation. The results revealed that the considered process mean is shifted for all QCs, and the most variation is associated with part diameter data. Moreover, the process data are not normally distributed, and the proposed transformation algorithm performs well in reducing data skewness. Also, the performance of the FDM process according to different designations of specification limits was estimated. The results showed that the FDM process is incapable of different designs except with very coarse specifications.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of Tensile Strength in Fused Deposition Modeling Process Using Artificial Neural Network Technique
    Manoharan, Karthic
    Chockalingam, K.
    Ram, S. Shankar
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FRONTIERS IN AUTOMOBILE AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (FAME 2020), 2020, 2311
  • [32] Investigating surfaces, geometry and degree of fusion of tracks printed using fused deposition modelling to optimise process parameters for polymeric materials at meso-scale
    Mwania, Fredrick
    Maringa, Maina
    Nsengimana, Joseph
    van der Walt, Jacobus Gert
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2024, 30 (11) : 159 - 172
  • [33] Developing New Ideas & Capability-Based Framework for Innovation Process: Firm Analysis for Indonesia
    Hartono, Arif
    6TH INDONESIA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND SMALL BUSINESS (IICIES 2014), 2015, 169 : 161 - 169
  • [34] Image Monitoring Study on Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Fabrication Process
    Tsai, Hung-Yin
    Hsu, Wei-Yuan
    Chen, Yi-Hung
    Tsao, Che-Chih
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, 2018, 39 (06): : 537 - 544
  • [35] Multivariate Statistical Process Control Using LASSO
    Zou, Changliang
    Qiu, Peihua
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 104 (488) : 1586 - 1596
  • [36] Profile monitoring based quality control method for fused deposition modeling process
    He, Ketai
    Zhang, Qian
    Hong, Yili
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2019, 30 (02) : 947 - 958
  • [37] Optimizing multiple process parameters in fused deposition modeling with particle swarm optimization
    Dey, Arup
    Hoffman, David
    Yodo, Nita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING - IJIDEM, 2020, 14 (02): : 393 - 405
  • [38] Toward a Better Understanding of the Fused Deposition Modeling Process: Comparison with Injection Molding
    Askanian, Haroutioun
    de Lima, Daniel Muranaka
    Commereuc, Sophie
    Verney, Vincent
    3D PRINTING AND ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2018, 5 (04) : 319 - 327
  • [39] Experimental Investigation using Taguchi Method to Optimize Process Parameters of Fused Deposition Modeling for ABS and Nylon Materials
    Vishwas, M.
    Basavaraj, C. K.
    Vinyas, M.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 5 (02) : 7106 - 7114
  • [40] A Process Evaluation of a Fall Prevention Intervention Using the RE-AIM Framework
    Somerville, Emily
    Yan, Yan
    Stark, Susan
    OTJR-OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2024, 44 (02): : 278 - 286