A framework for fused deposition modelling process evaluation using multivariate process capability analysis

被引:0
作者
Alatefi, Moath [1 ]
Al-Ahmari, Abdulrahman M. [1 ]
AlFaify, Abdullah Yahia [1 ]
Saleh, Mustafa [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 12期
关键词
PERFORMANCE; PARTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0308380
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The rapid advancement of additive manufacturing (AM) requires researchers to keep up with these advancements by continually improving the AM processes. Improving manufacturing processes involves evaluating the process outputs and their conformity to the required specifications. Process capability indices, calculated using critical quality characteristics (QCs), have long been used in the evaluation process due to their proven effectiveness. AM processes typically involve multi-correlated critical QCs, indicating the need to develop a multivariate process capability index (MPCI) rather than a univariate capability index, which may lead to misleading results. In this regard, this study proposes a general methodological framework for evaluating AM processes using MPCI. The proposed framework starts by identifying the AM process and product design. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is chosen for this investigation. Then, the specification limits associated with critical QCs are established. To ensure that the MPCI assumptions are met, the critical QCs data are examined for normality, stability, and correlation. Additionally, the MPCI is estimated by simulating a large sample using the properties of the collected QCs data and determining the percent of nonconforming (PNC). Furthermore, the FDM process and its capable tolerance limits are then assessed using the proposed MPCI. Finally, the study presents a sensitivity analysis of the FDM process and suggestions for improvement based on the analysis of assignable causes of variation. The results revealed that the considered process mean is shifted for all QCs, and the most variation is associated with part diameter data. Moreover, the process data are not normally distributed, and the proposed transformation algorithm performs well in reducing data skewness. Also, the performance of the FDM process according to different designations of specification limits was estimated. The results showed that the FDM process is incapable of different designs except with very coarse specifications.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A framework for optimizing process parameters in fused deposition modeling using predictive modeling coupled response surface methodology
    Deka, Angshuman
    Hall, John F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 131 (01) : 447 - 466
  • [12] Experimental study on tensile strength of copper microparticles filled polymer composites printed by fused deposition modelling process
    Adibi, Hamed
    Hashemi, Mohammad Reza
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (01) : 21 - 31
  • [13] Confidence Based Quality Evaluation for Total Manufacturing Process Using Comprehensive Process Capability
    Gao, Kongjun
    He, Yihai
    Wang, Linbo
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2015, : 1387 - 1391
  • [14] Multivariate process capability analysis applied to AISI 52100 hardened steel turning
    Peruchi, R. S.
    Rotela Junior, P.
    Brito, T. G.
    Largo, J. J. J.
    Balestrassi, P. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 95 (9-12) : 3513 - 3522
  • [15] A multivariate process capability index that complies with industry requirements
    de-Felipe, David
    Klee, Tobias
    Folmer, Jens
    Vogel-Heuser, Birgit
    Benedito, Ernest
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IECON 2016 - 42ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, 2016, : 4595 - 4600
  • [16] Comparing Confidence Intervals for Multivariate Process Capability Indices
    Tano, Ingrid
    Vannman, Kerstin
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 28 (04) : 481 - 495
  • [17] Effect of process parameters on parts quality and process efficiency of fused deposition modeling
    Galetto, Maurizio
    Verna, Elisa
    Genta, Gianfranco
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 156
  • [18] Additive manufacturing of continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties
    Chacon, J. M.
    Caminero, M. A.
    Nunez, P. J.
    Garcia-Plaza, E.
    Garcia-Moreno, I.
    Reverte, J. M.
    COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 181
  • [19] A systematic review of fused deposition modeling process parameters
    Ahmad, NurFarrahain Nadia
    Wong, Yew Hoong
    Ghazali, Nik Nazri Nik
    SOFT SCIENCE, 2022, 2 (03):
  • [20] Effect of fused deposition modelling process parameters on mechanical properties of 3D printed parts
    Chadha, Abhinav
    Ul Haq, Mir Irfan
    Raina, Ankush
    Singh, Rana Ratna
    Penumarti, Narendra Babu
    Bishnoi, Manjeet Singh
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2019, 16 (04) : 550 - 559