Knowledge governance and innovation ambidexterity in the platform context: exploring the role of knowledge transformation

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Qian [1 ]
Wang, Shuxiang [2 ]
Wang, Liya [2 ]
Xu, Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Womens Univ, Sch Business Adm, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] BeijingJiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Jinan, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Jinan, Peoples R China
关键词
Contractual knowledge governance; Relationship knowledge governance; Tacit-knowledge socialization; Explicit-knowledge combination; Innovation ambidexterity; RELATIONAL GOVERNANCE; FORMAL CONTRACTS; PERFORMANCE; MECHANISMS; CREATION; LEVEL; EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION; CAPABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1108/JKM-03-2024-0256
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
PurposeOpen innovation platform has become an effective field through which enterprises can acquire valuable knowledge for incremental and breakthrough innovation. However, as more entities join the innovation platform, the knowledge activities in the platform ecosystem are now facing higher complexity and vulnerability due to the differences in the knowledge demands as well as conflicting interest claims of participants. The lack of mature governance mechanisms has caused opportunistic behaviors like knowledge infringement, leakage and hiding, which seriously hinder the in-depth knowledge sharing and effective utilization. What's more, the enthusiasm for collaborative innovation also reduced among multi-subjects. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to improve platform participants' innovation ambidexterity under the guidance of scientific design of platform knowledge governance mechanisms through improved knowledge transformation processes.Design/methodology/approachTherefore, based on knowledge governance theory and knowledge transformation model (SECI, socialization-externalization-combination-internalization), the study explored the influence of relationship and contractual knowledge governance on the innovation ambidexterity of platform participants through the mediation effect of knowledge transformation. To better analyze complex causal relationships among variables and the chain multiple mediation effect, structural equation modeling is used, coupled with bootstrap analysis verification.FindingsPlatform contractual governance and relationship governance can positively influence the innovation ambidexterity of participants through knowledge trading and reuse, as well as through knowledge sharing and creation. The findings not only contribute to optimizing the effectiveness of knowledge activities on digital platforms but also provide empirical evidence and practical insights to support enterprises' incremental and breakthrough innovation according to their own knowledge bases.Practical implicationsThe findings offer valuable insights for providing decision-making guidance not only for platform-leading enterprises but also for individual and enterprise users on effectively using open innovation platforms to conduct knowledge seeking, trading or sharing and knowledge reuse or creation to enlarge the incremental innovation value and to trigger breakthrough innovation value in their product and technology developments.Social implicationsThrough diverse knowledge governance mechanisms, platform-leading enterprises do not only act as "economic agents" with private attributes to reduce knowledge asymmetry in the public trading market, diffuse knowledge broadly and mitigate cooperation costs to increase economic value; they also serve as "social actors" for multilateral participants to increase the cohesion of knowledge sharing and creation to provide sustainable knowledge fuel for the higher level of breakthrough innovation. Overall, knowledge arrangement efficiency can be optimized, and breakthrough innovation value can be activated in a well-governed platform, gradually escaping the diminishing marginal benefits of exploitative innovation.Originality/valueThis study has extended the views of the knowledge transformation model under the platform context and proposed dualistic knowledge transformation pathways, named "tacit knowledge socialization" and "explicit knowledge combination," respectively. Besides, it discovered that under the contractual and relationship knowledge governance mechanisms' guiding, participants in open innovation platforms may choose different knowledge searching and exchange ways according to their knowledge needs and thus trigger the different knowledge transform process. Then, "tacit knowledge socialization" transformation can show larger positive impact on breakthrough innovation, while "explicit knowledge combination" transformation makes larger impact on incremental innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Organizational ambidexterity: exploring the knowledge base
    Francisco García-Lillo
    Mercedes Úbeda-García
    Bartolomé Marco-Lajara
    Scientometrics, 2016, 107 : 1021 - 1040
  • [2] Organizational ambidexterity: exploring the knowledge base
    Garcia-Lillo, Francisco
    Ubeda-Garcia, Mercedes
    Marco-Lajara, Bartolome
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 107 (03) : 1021 - 1040
  • [3] Strategic knowledge, IT capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: role of business process performance
    Yoshikuni, Adilson Carlos
    Dwivedi, Rajeev
    Dwivedi, Yogesh K.
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2024, 124 (02) : 915 - 948
  • [4] FINDING THE WAY TO AMBIDEXTERITY: EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG ORGANISATIONAL DESIGN, KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND INNOVATION
    Martini, Antonella
    Neirotti, Paolo
    Aloini, Davide
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 19 (04)
  • [5] IT-enabled Knowledge Ambidexterity and Innovation Performance: The Role of Social Media Capability
    Benitez, Jose
    Castillo, Ana
    Llorens, Javier
    Braojos, Jessica
    AMCIS 2016 PROCEEDINGS, 2016,
  • [6] Knowledge assets, innovation ambidexterity and firm performance in knowledge-intensive companies
    Asiaei, Kaveh
    Bontis, Nick
    Askari, Mohammad Reza
    Yaghoubi, Mehdi
    Barani, Omid
    JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 27 (08) : 2136 - 2161
  • [7] Linking External Knowledge Search to Innovation Ambidexterity in SMEs
    Ryu, Dongwoo
    Baek, Kwang Ho
    Yoon, Junghyun
    SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2022, 27 (02) : 159 - 171
  • [8] Open Innovation and the Role of Hubs of Knowledge in a Regional Context
    Gabriele R.
    D’Ambrosio A.
    Schiavone F.
    Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2017, 8 (3) : 1049 - 1065
  • [9] Applying the ambidexterity approach to knowledge exchange and knowledge protection in the context of absorptive capacity
    Stelmaszczyk, Monika
    Jarubas, Adam
    E-MENTOR, 2019, (02): : 68 - 78
  • [10] The role of relational governance in innovation platform growth: the context of living labs
    Cantu, Chiara Luisa
    Schepis, Daniel
    Minunno, Roberto
    Morrison, Greg
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2021, 36 (13) : 236 - 249