Impact of orthodontic treatment with aligners and fixed appliances on OHRQoL: a randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Borsato, Thais Teixeira [1 ]
Bittencourt, Jessica Madeira [2 ]
Paiva, Saul Martins [2 ]
Conti, Ana Claudia de Castro Ferreira [2 ]
Fernandes, Thais Maria Freire [1 ]
de Almeida-Pedrin, Renata Rodrigues [1 ]
de Almeida, Marcio Rodrigues [1 ]
Oltramari, Paula Vanessa Pedron [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Uniderp, Dept Orthodont, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent & Orthodont, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH | 2025年 / 39卷
关键词
Orthodontics; Quality of Life; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SELF-ESTEEM; THERAPY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.012
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of orthodontic treatment with orthodontic aligners (OAs) and fixed appliances (FAs) on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). This parallel randomized clinical trial included 40 male and female patients aged 13 to 35 years diagnosed with Angle's Class I malocclusion. Participants were assigned to two groups: OA (n = 20) and FA (n = 20). OHRQoL was assessed using the Brazilian OHIP-14, which was administered before treatment (T0), at 1 month (T1), 6 months (T2), and 12 months (T3) after treatment initiation. Data were analyzed using the independent t test, the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Friedman test (p < 0.05). FAs had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher impact on OHRQoL at T1 in terms of functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, and overall score. Within-group comparison showed higher scores for the FA group in comparison to the OA group. Functional limitation scores were higher at T1 than at T0 (p = 0.034), while physical pain scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.034) and T2 (p = 0.010). Psychological discomfort scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.015). Physical disability scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.008). Overall scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.003). No significant changes were observed in the OA within-group comparison. Patients treated with OAs had less impact on OHRQoL compared to those treated with FAs in the first month. There was no difference between the groups at the 6-month follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mandibular advancement appliances for sleep-disordered breathing in children: A randomized crossover clinical trial
    Idris, Ghassan
    Galland, Barbara
    Robertson, Christopher John
    Gray, Andrew
    Farella, Mauro
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2018, 71 : 9 - 17
  • [42] Impact of gingivitis treatment for diabetic patients on quality of life related to periodontal objective parameters: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Cortelli, Sheila C.
    Costa, Fernando O.
    Gargioni-Filho, Antonio
    Aquino, Davi R.
    Cota, Luis O. M.
    Scherma, Alexandre P.
    Miranda, This B.
    Cortelli, Jose R.
    ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 86 : 80 - 86
  • [43] Treatment effectiveness of young adults using clear aligners versus buccal fixed appliances in class I malocclusion with first premolar extraction using the ABO-Objective Grading System: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Jaber, Samer T.
    Hajeer, Mohammad Y.
    Burhan, Ahmad S.
    Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
    Al-Ibrahim, Heba M.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2023, 21 (04)
  • [44] Impact of the first eight months of orthodontic treatment with a fixed appliance on the families of adolescent patients
    Abreu, Lucas G.
    Melgaco, Camilo A.
    Abreu, Mauro H. N. G.
    Lages, Elizabeth M. B.
    Paiva, Saul M.
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2014, 84 (06) : 1074 - 1078
  • [45] The impact of orthodontic-surgical treatment on facial expressions—a four-dimensional clinical trial
    Anja Quast
    Monika Sadlonova
    Thomas Asendorf
    Carlotta Derad
    Jérémy Mouchoux
    Julia Horn
    Henning Schliephake
    Philipp Kauffmann
    Philipp Meyer-Marcotty
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, 27 : 5841 - 5851
  • [46] Caries prevalence measured with QLF after treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances: Influencing factors
    Boersma, JG
    van der Veen, MH
    Lagerweij, MD
    Bokhout, B
    Prahl-Andersen, B
    CARIES RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [47] Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and biofilm formation-a potential public health threat?
    Ren, Yijin
    Jongsma, Marije A.
    Mei, Li
    van der Mei, Henny C.
    Busscher, Henk J.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 18 (07) : 1711 - 1718
  • [48] Association between gingival bleeding and gingival enlargement and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of subjects under fixed orthodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study
    Fabricio Batistin Zanatta
    Thiago Machado Ardenghi
    Raquel Pippi Antoniazzi
    Tatiana Militz Perrone Pinto
    Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rösing
    BMC Oral Health, 12
  • [49] Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial strains in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with and without fixed appliances
    Pellissari, Bruno Andrade
    Pereira Sabino, Gabriela Sergini
    de Souza Lima, Roberto Nepomuceno
    Lopes Motta, Rogerio Heladio
    Suzuki, Selly Sayuri
    Garcez, Aguinaldo Silva
    Basting, Roberta Tarkany
    Barbosa, Jurandir Antonio
    Martins Montalli, Victor Angelo
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2021, 91 (05) : 672 - 679
  • [50] The Efficacy of the Three Types of Plaque Control Methods During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kumar, Amit
    Singh, Jaideep
    Sinha, Pallavi
    Kini, Vineet Vaman
    Champaneri, Harshal R.
    Mishra, Shashank Kumar
    Tiwari, Anushree
    Singh, Ramanpal
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)