Assessing the impact of ultrasound image standardization in deep learning-based segmentation of carotid plaque types

被引:0
|
作者
Liapi, Georgia D. [1 ]
Loizou, Christos P. [1 ]
Pattichis, Constantinos S. [2 ]
Pattichis, Marios S. [3 ]
Nicolaides, Andrew N. [4 ]
Griffin, Maura [4 ]
Kyriacou, Efthyvoulos [1 ]
机构
[1] Cyprus Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn Comp Engn & Informat, Limassol, Cyprus
[2] Univ Cyprus, Dept Comp Sci, Nicosia, Cyprus
[3] Univ New Mexico, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Albuquerque, NM USA
[4] Vasc Screening & Diagnost Ctr, Nicosia, Cyprus
关键词
Deep learning; Segmentation; Ultrasound image; Standardization; Carotid plaque types; INTEGRATED-SYSTEM; RISK; STROKE; STENOSIS; NORMALIZATION; SUBTYPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108460
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Carotid B-mode ultrasound (CBUS) imaging is often used to detect and assess atherosclerotic plaques. Doctors often need to segment plaques in the CBUS images to further examine them. Multiple studies have proposed two-dimensional CBUS plaque segmentation deep learning (DL)-based solutions, achieving promising results. In most of these studies, image standardization is not reported, while not all plaque types are represented. However, prior multiple studies have highlighted the importance of data standardization in computerized CBUS plaque classification or segmentation solutions. In this study, we propose and separately evaluate three progressive preprocessing schemes, to discover the most optimal to standardize CBUS images for DL-based carotid plaque segmentation, while we also assess the effect of each preprocessing in the segmentation performance per echodensity-based plaque type (I, II, III, IV and V). Methods: We included three CBUS image datasets (276 CBUS images, from three medical centres), with which we produced 3 data folds (with the best possible equal inclusion of images from all centers per fold), to perform 3fold cross validation-based training and evaluation of the pre-released Channel-wise Feature Pyramid Network for Medicine (CFPNet-M) model, in carotid plaque type segmentation. We included the three data folds in their original version (O), generating also three preprocessed versions of them, namely, the resolution-normalized (R), the resolution- and intensity-normalized (RN), and the resolution- and intensity-normalized combined with despeckling (RND) versions. The samples were cropped to the plaque level, and the intersection over union (IoU) and the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), along with other metrics, were used to measure the model's performance. In each training round, 12 % of the images in the 2 training folds was used for internal validation (last fold was used in evaluation). Two experienced ultrasonographers manually delineated plaques in the dataset, to provide us with ground truths, while the plaque types (I to V) were extracted according to the Gray-Weale and Geroulakos classification system. We measured the meanfstandard deviation of DSC within and across the three evaluated folds, per preprocessing scheme and per plaque type. Results: CFPNet-M segmented the plaques in the CBUS images in all the data preprocessing versions, yielding progressively improved performances (mean DSC at 81.9 f 9.1 %, 83.6 f 9.0%, 84.1 f 8.3%, and 84.4 f 8.1 % for the O, R, RN and RND 3-fold cross validation processes, respectively), irrespective of the plaque type. Interestingly, CFPNet_M yielded improved performances, for all plaque types (I, II, III, IV and V), when trained and tested with the RND data versus the O version, achieving an 80.6 f 11 % versus 77.6 f 17% DSC for type I, an 84.3 f 8 % versus 81.2 f 9% DSC for type II, an 84.9 f 7% versus 82.6 f 7% for type III, an 85.3 f 8 % versus 83.9 f 7% for type IV, and a 84.8 f 8 % versus 81.8 f 2 % for type V. The best increase in DSC, from the O to the RND CBUS images, was found for the plaque type I (3.86 % increase), with types II and V, following. Conclusions: In this study, we investigated the impact of CBUS standardization in DL-based carotid plaque type segmentation and showed that indeed normalization of the image resolution and intensity, combined with speckle noise removal, prior to model training and testing, enhances the DL model's performance, across all plaque types. Based on the findings in this study, CBUS images should be standardized when destined for DL based segmentation tasks, while all plaque types should be considered, as in a plethora of existing relevant studies, uniformly echolucent plaques or heavily calcified plaques with acoustic shadow are notably underrepresented.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A review of deep learning segmentation methods for carotid artery ultrasound images
    Huang, Qinghua
    Tian, Haozhe
    Jia, Lizhi
    Li, Ziming
    Zhou, Zishu
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2023, 545
  • [32] Calibrating ensembles for scalable uncertainty quantification in deep learning-based medical image segmentation
    Buddenkotte, Thomas
    Sanchez, Lorena Escudero
    Crispin-Ortuzar, Mireia
    Woitek, Ramona
    McCague, Cathal
    Brenton, James D.
    Oktem, Ozan
    Sala, Evis
    Rundo, Leonardo
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2023, 163
  • [33] Deep learning-based image annotation for leukocyte segmentation and classification of blood cell morphology
    Anand, Vatsala
    Gupta, Sheifali
    Koundal, Deepika
    Alghamdi, Wael Y.
    Alsharbi, Bayan M.
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [34] Proceeding the categorization of microplastics through deep learning-based image segmentation
    Huang, Hui
    Cai, Huiwen
    Qureshi, Junaid Ullah
    Mehdi, Syed Raza
    Song, Hong
    Liu, Caicai
    Di, Yanan
    Shi, Huahong
    Yao, Weimin
    Sun, Zehao
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 896
  • [35] Deep learning-based automated image segmentation for concrete petrographic analysis
    Song, Yu
    Huang, Zilong
    Shen, Chuanyue
    Shi, Humphrey
    Lange, David A.
    CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2020, 135 (135)
  • [36] Selecting the best optimizers for deep learning-based medical image segmentation
    Mortazi, Aliasghar
    Cicek, Vedat
    Keles, Elif
    Bagci, Ulas
    FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 3
  • [37] Assessing the Performance of Deep Learning-Based Models for Prostate Cancer Segmentation Using Uncertainty Scores
    Cesar Quihui-Rubio, Pablo
    Flores-Araiza, Daniel
    Ochoa-Ruiz, Gilberto
    Gonzalez-Mendoza, Miguel
    Mata, Christian
    CANCER PREVENTION THROUGH EARLY DETECTION, CAPTION 2023, 2023, 14295 : 83 - 93
  • [38] High-Frequency Ultrasound Dataset for Deep Learning-Based Image Quality Assessment
    Czajkowska, Joanna
    Juszczyk, Jan
    Piejko, Laura
    Glenc-Ambrozy, Malgorzata
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (04)
  • [39] Deep learning-based carotid plaque vulnerability classification with multicentre contrast-enhanced ultrasound video: a comparative diagnostic study
    Guang, Yang
    He, Wen
    Ning, Bin
    Zhang, Hongxia
    Yin, Chen
    Zhao, Mingchang
    Nie, Fang
    Huang, Pintong
    Zhang, Rui-Fang
    Yong, Qiang
    Guo, Yanli
    Yuan, Jianjun
    Wang, Yicheng
    Yuan, Lijun
    Ruan, Litao
    Yu, Tengfei
    Song, Haiman
    Zhang, Yukang
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [40] Review of Image Augmentation Used in Deep Learning-Based Material Microscopic Image Segmentation
    Ma, Jingchao
    Hu, Chenfei
    Zhou, Peng
    Jin, Fangfang
    Wang, Xu
    Huang, Haiyou
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (11):