Zonal Safety and Particular Risk Analysis for Early Aircraft Design

被引:0
|
作者
Bamrah, Parush [1 ]
Liscouet-Hanke, Susan [1 ]
Tfaily, Ali [2 ]
Tamayo, Alvaro [3 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Mech Ind & Aerosp Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Bombardier, Adv Prod Dev, Dorval, PQ H9P 1A2, Canada
[3] Bombardier, Res & Technol, Dorval, PQ H9P 1A2, Canada
来源
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Aircraft Design Process; Aircraft Components and Structure; System Architectures; Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization; Computer Aided Engineering; Aircraft Safety; Aircraft Systems;
D O I
10.2514/1.C037774
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Safety is paramount in aircraft design, and increasing aircraft complexity necessitates safety assessments early in design. For unconventional aircraft with novel propulsion or system technologies, it becomes even more critical to investigate safety as early as possible to avoid unfeasible configurations. In this context, the particular risk analysis (PRA) and the zonal safety analysis (ZSA) are essential to assess early, as they impact the aircraft configuration. These analyses require a three-dimensional (3D) aircraft model and substantial manual effort, limiting the ability to perform rapid iterations required to support design space exploration and multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO). To analyze many aircraft configurations and system architectures, the 3D parametric model and the PRA and ZSA require automation. This paper reviews methodologies for performing the ZSA and PRA from a systems point of view and proposes parametric zone definition, identification of risk zones, and a conceptual-level analysis of the component placement strategy. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated with an aft equipment bay of a business aircraft for varying geometrical granularity and system electrification. Overall, the presented method is a step toward integrating system safety analysis into MDO environments, thus increasing conceptual design maturity and reducing development time.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EARLY DAYS WITH AIRCRAFT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
    JONES, T
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL AERONAUTICAL SOCIETY, 1966, 70 (664): : 492 - &
  • [22] Safety factors in civil aircraft design requirements
    Bristow, John W.
    Irving, P. E.
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2007, 14 (03) : 459 - 470
  • [23] Design and Evaluation of a Safety Augmentation System for Aircraft
    Borst, C.
    Grootendorst, F. H.
    Brouwer, D. I. K.
    Bedoya, C.
    Mulder, M.
    van Paassen, M. M.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2014, 51 (01): : 12 - 22
  • [24] Enhanced zonal analysis rating and inspection intervals determination of civil aircraft
    Su, Maogen
    Zhang, Yuxin
    Jia, Baohui
    Information Technology Journal, 2013, 12 (20) : 5922 - 5928
  • [25] Reducing risk and improving safety with particular reference to NATM
    Anderson, JM
    NORTH AMERICAN TUNNELING '96, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 35 - 42
  • [27] ZONAL ANALYSIS - THE FINAL STEP IN SYSTEM SAFETY ASSESSMENT
    CALDWELL, RE
    MERDGEN, DB
    PROCEEDINGS ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 1991, (SYM): : 277 - 279
  • [28] The Aircraft Airworthiness and safety Standards Analysis
    Hu, Jie
    MODERN TENDENCIES IN ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2014, 533 : 371 - 374
  • [29] Research on Architecture Design and Safety Analysis of Avionics Architecture Databus Network for Commercial Aircraft
    Quan, Yiqing
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES (IWMECS 2018), 2018, 78 : 28 - 34
  • [30] Aircraft design and analysis tools
    不详
    AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2000, 20 (03) : 13 - 13