Evolution of Proton Radiation Therapy Brainstem Constraints on the Pediatric Proton/ Photon Consortium Registry

被引:0
|
作者
Correia, Dora [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Indelicato, Daniel J. [4 ]
Paulino, Arnold C. [5 ]
Ermoian, Ralph [6 ]
Mihalcik, Stephen [7 ]
Perkins, Stephanie M. [8 ]
Hill-Kayser, Christine [9 ]
Mangona, Victor S. [10 ]
Lee, Jae [11 ]
Chang, John Han-Chih [12 ,13 ]
Laack, Nadia N. [14 ]
Kwok, Young [15 ]
Perentesis, John [16 ]
Vatner, Ralph [17 ,18 ]
Dave, Ronak [19 ,20 ]
Gallotto, Sara L. [1 ]
Lawell, Miranda P. [1 ]
Bajaj, Benjamin V. M. [1 ]
Allison, Keith W. [1 ]
Perry, Alisa [1 ]
Yock, Torunn I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Cantonal Hosp Aarau, Dept Radiat Oncol, CH-5001 Aarau, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Inselspital, Univ Hosp Bern, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jacksonville, FL USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Northwestern Med Chicago Proton Ctr, Warrenville, IL USA
[8] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO USA
[9] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[10] Texas Ctr Proton Therapy, Dept Radiat Oncol, Irving, TX USA
[11] ProCure Proton Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Franklin Township, NJ USA
[12] Oklahoma Proton Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[13] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[14] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN USA
[15] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[16] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Oncol, Cincinnati, OH USA
[17] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[18] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[19] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, Augusta, GA USA
[20] Emory Univ, Dept Pediat, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; IMAGING CHANGES; CHILDREN; OUTCOMES; TOXICITIES; NECROSIS; INJURY;
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2024.05.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Increasing concern that brainstem toxicity incidence after proton radiation therapy might be higher than with photons led to a 2014 University of Florida (UF) landmark paper identifying its risk factors and proposing more conservative dose constraints. We evaluated how practice patterns changed among the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR). Material and Methods: This prospective multicenter cohort study gathered data from patients under the age of 22 years enrolled on the PPCR, treated between 2002 and 2019 for primary posterior fossa brain tumors. After standardizing brainstem contours, we garnered dosimetry data and correlated those meeting the 2014 proton-specific brainstem constraint guidelines by treatment era, histology, and extent of surgical resection. Results: A total of 467 patients with evaluable proton radiation therapy plans were reviewed. Median age was 7.1 years (range: <1-21.9), 63.0% (n = 296) were men, 76.0% (n = 357) were White, and predominant histology was medulloblastoma (55.0%, n = 256), followed by ependymoma (27.0%, n = 125). Extent of resection was mainly gross total resection (GTR) (67.0%, n = 312), followed by subtotal resection (STR) or biopsy (20.0%, n = 92), and near total resection (NTR) (9.2%, n = 43). The UF brainstem constraint metrics most often exceeded were the goal D-50% of 52.4 gray relative biological equivalents (43.3%, n = 202) and maximal D-50% of 54 gray relative biological equivalents (12.6%, n = 59). The compliance rate increased after the new guidelines (2002-2014: 64.0% vs 2015-2019: 74.6%, P = .02), except for ependymoma (46.3% pre- vs 50.0% post-guidelines, P = .86), presenting lower compliance (48.8%) in comparison to medulloblastoma/ primitive neuroectodermal tumors/pineoblastoma (77.7%), glioma (89.1%), and atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (90.9%) (P < .001). Degree of surgical resection did not affect compliance rates (GTR/NTR 71.0% vs STR/biopsy 72.8%, P = .45), even within the ependymoma subset (GTR/NTR 50.5% vs STR/biopsy 38.1%, P = .82). Conclusion: Since the publication of the UF guidelines, the pediatric proton community has implemented more conservative brainstem constraints in all patients except those with ependymoma, irrespective of residual disease after surgery. Future work will evaluate if this change in practice is associated with decreased rates of brainstem toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:e507 / e514
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-Effectiveness of Proton Versus Photon Therapy in Pediatric Medulloblastoma Treatment: A Patient Volume-Based Analysis
    Alves Fernandes, Ricardo Ribeiro
    de Mello Vianna, Cid Manso
    Guerra, Renata Leborato
    Cancela, Marianna de Camargo
    de Almeida, Liz Maria
    da Conceicao Pereira, Adail Jose
    Pais Viegas, Celia Maria
    Ferman, Sima Esther
    de Correa, Flavia
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2019, 20 : 122 - 128
  • [42] Proton Beam Therapy for Pediatric Brain Tumor
    Mizumoto, Masashi
    Oshiro, Yoshiko
    Yamamoto, Tetsuya
    Kohzuki, Hidehiro
    Sakurai, Hideyuki
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2017, 57 (07) : 343 - 355
  • [43] Proton Therapy in the Management of Pediatric Malignant Tumors
    Firat, Selim
    Jogal, Sachin
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2009, 19 (01): : 53 - 57
  • [44] National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury
    Haas-Kogan, Daphne
    Indelicato, Daniel
    Paganetti, Harald
    Esiashvili, Natia
    Mahajan, Anita
    Yock, Torunn
    Flampouri, Stella
    MacDonald, Shannon
    Fouladi, Maryam
    Stephen, Kry
    Kalapurakal, John
    Terezakis, Stephanie
    Kooy, Hanne
    Grosshans, David
    Makrigiorgos, Mike
    Mishra, Kavita
    Poussaint, Tina Young
    Cohen, Kenneth
    Fitzgerald, Thomas
    Gondi, Vinai
    Liu, Arthur
    Michalski, Jeff
    Mirkovic, Dragan
    Mohan, Radhe
    Perkins, Stephanie
    Wong, Kenneth
    Vikram, Bhadrasain
    Buchsbaum, Jeff
    Kun, Larry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 101 (01): : 152 - 168
  • [45] Spectrum of neuroimaging findings post-proton beam therapy in a large pediatric cohort
    Bhattacharya, Debarata
    Chhabda, Sahil
    Lakshmanan, Rahul
    Tan, Ronald
    Warne, Richard
    Benenati, Massimo
    Michalski, Anthony
    Aquilina, Kristian
    Jacques, Thomas
    Hargrave, Darren
    Chang, Yen-Ching
    Gains, Jenny
    Mankad, Kshitij
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2021, 37 (02) : 435 - 446
  • [46] Health Care Resource Utilization for Esophageal Cancer Using Proton versus Photon Radiation Therapy
    Lin, Steven H.
    Liao, Kaiping
    Lei, Xiudong
    Verma, Vivek
    Shaaban, Sherif
    Lee, Percy
    Chen, Aileen B.
    Koong, Albert C.
    Hoftstetter, Wayne L.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Shih, Ya-Chen Tina
    Giordano, Sharon H.
    Smith, Grace L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2022, 9 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [47] Clinical Controversies: Proton Therapy for Pediatric Tumors
    Merchant, Thomas E.
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 23 (02) : 97 - 108
  • [48] The role of proton therapy in gynecological radiation oncology
    Taunk, Neil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 (03) : 414 - 420
  • [49] A case-control study of linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness related to symptomatic brainstem toxicity following pediatric proton therapy
    Fjaera, Lars Fredrik
    Indelicato, Daniel J.
    Handeland, Andreas H.
    Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S.
    Lassen-Ramshad, Yasmin
    Muren, Ludvig P.
    Stokkevag, Camilla H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 175 : 47 - 55
  • [50] Proton radiation therapy (PRT) for pediatric optic pathway gliomas: Comparison with 3D planned conventional photons and a standard photon technique
    Fuss, M
    Hug, EB
    Schaefer, RA
    Nevinny-Stickel, M
    Miller, DW
    Slater, JM
    Slater, JD
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (05): : 1117 - 1126